Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Irrigation and debridement (I&D) is performed for early management of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Symptom reporting is a subjective measure and may miss direct management of PJI. Utilizing an objective time interval from index procedure to I&D may better inform treatment decisions. METHODS:From 2009 to 2017, retrospective review was performed of 55 knee PJI cases at our institution. All patients underwent polyethylene liner exchange and I&D for PJI. Patients were stratified by time from index procedure to I&D (≤2 weeks, >2 weeks). Success was defined as eradication of infection and resolution of presenting symptoms. Failed cases required subsequent procedures due to infection. RESULTS:Average follow-up time after index TKA was 2.5 years. Among patients with I&D within 2 weeks of index TXA, 14 patients (82%) were successfully treated while 3 (18%) had infection recurrence. These outcomes were significantly improved compared to patients with I&D after 2 weeks: 19 (50%) successes and 19 (50%) failures (P = .024). Staphylococcal species were the most frequent pathogen in patients treated before and after 2 weeks of index TKA (39% and 50%, respectively). Outcomes were pathogen-independent in PJIs treated before or after 2 weeks of index TKA (P = .206 and .594, respectively). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our results demonstrate that patients with early PJI managed with I&D and liner exchange within 2 weeks of index TKA had higher rates of treatment success when compared to those with I&D beyond 2 weeks. These findings suggest that time from index TKA to I&D is an objective and reliable indicator of treatment success when considering I&D in acute onset knee PJI.

BACKGROUND:The Affordable Care Act of 2010 advanced the economic model of bundled payments for total joint arthroplasty (TJA), in which hospitals will be financially responsible for readmissions, typically at 90 days after surgery. However, little is known about the financial burden of readmissions and what patient, clinical, and hospital factors drive readmission costs. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES/OBJECTIVE:(1) What is the incidence, payer mix, and demographics of THA and TKA readmissions in the United States? (2) What patient, clinical, and hospital factors are associated with the cost of 30- and 90-day readmissions after primary THA and TKA? (3) Are there any differences in the economic burden of THA and TKA readmissions between payers? (4) What types of THA and TKA readmissions are most costly to the US hospital system? METHODS:The recently developed Nationwide Readmissions Database from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (2006 hospitals from 21 states) was used to identify 719,394 primary TJAs and 62,493 90-day readmissions in the first 9 months of 2013 based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. We classified the reasons for readmissions as either procedure- or medical-related. Cost-to-charge ratios supplied with the Nationwide Readmissions Database were used to compute the individual per-patient cost of 90-day readmissions as a continuous variable in separate general linear models for THA and TKA. Payer, patient, clinical, and hospital factors were treated as covariates. We estimated the national burden of readmissions by payer and by the reason for readmission. RESULTS:The national rates of 30- and 90-day readmissions after THA were 4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2%-4.5%) and 8% (95% CI, 7.5%-8.1%), respectively. The national rates of 30- and 90-day readmissions after primary TKA were 4% (95% CI, 3.8%-4.0%) and 7% (95% CI, 6.8%-7.2%), respectively. The five most important variables responsible for the cost of 90-day THA readmissions (in rank order, based on the Type III F-statistic, p < 0.001) were length of stay (LOS), all patient-refined diagnosis-related group (APR DRG) severity, type of readmission (that is, medical- versus procedure-related), hospital ownership, and age. Likewise, the five most important variables responsible for the cost of 90-day TKA readmissions were LOS, APR DRG severity, gender, hospital procedure volume, and hospital ownership. After adjusting for covariates, mean 90-day readmission costs reimbursed by private insurance were, on average, USD 1324 and USD 1372 greater than Medicare (p < 0.001) for THA and TKA, respectively. In the 90 days after TJA, two-thirds of the total annual readmission costs were covered by Medicare. In 90 days after THA, more readmissions were still associated with procedure-related complications, including infections, dislocations, and periprosthetic fractures, which in aggregate account for 59% (95% CI, 59.1%-59.6%) of the total readmission costs to the US healthcare system. For TKA, 49% of the total readmission cost (95% CI, 48.8%-49.6%) in 90 days for the United States was associated with procedure issues, most notably including infections. CONCLUSIONS:Hospital readmissions up to 90 days after TJA represent a massive economic burden on the US healthcare system. Approximately half of the total annual economic burden for readmissions in the United States is medical and unrelated to the joint replacement procedure and half is related to procedural complications. CLINICAL RELEVANCE/CONCLUSIONS:This national study underscores LOS during readmission as a primary cost driver, suggesting that hospitals and doctors further optimize, to the extent possible, the clinical pathways for the hospitalization of readmitted patients. Because patients readmitted as a result of infection, dislocation, and periprosthetic fractures are the most costly types of readmissions, efforts to reduce the LOS for these types of readmissions will have the greatest impact on their economic burden. Additional clinical research is needed to determine the extent to which, if any, the LOS during readmissions can be reduced without sacrificing quality or access of care.

BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to determine whether the cost of readmissions after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA) has decreased since the introduction of health care reform legislation and what patient, clinical, and hospital factors drive such costs. METHODS:The 100% Medicare inpatient dataset was used to identify 1,654,602 primary THA and TKA procedures between 2010 and 2014. The per-patient cost of readmissions was evaluated in general linear models in which the year of surgery and patient, clinical, and hospital factors were treated as covariates in separate models for THA and TKA. RESULTS:The year-to-year risk of 90-day readmission was reduced by 2% and 4% (P < .001) for THA and TKA, respectively. By contrast, the cost of readmissions did not change significantly over time. The 5 most important variables associated with the cost of 90-day THA readmissions (in rank order) were the nature of the readmission (ie, due to medical or procedure-related reasons), the length of stay, hospital's teaching status, discharge disposition, and hospital's overall total joint arthroplasty volume. The top 5 factors associated with the cost of 90-day TKA readmissions were (in rank order) the length of stay, hospital's teaching status, discharge disposition, patient's gender, and age. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Although readmission rates declined slightly, the results of this study do not support the hypothesis that readmission costs have decreased since the introduction of health care reform legislation. Instead, we found that clinical and hospital factors were among the most important cost drivers.

Introduction/objectives: Peri-prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are a continued concern in arthroplasty surgery. The rate of PJIs for total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures varies from 0.3% to 2.9%. Irrigation & debridement (I&D) with a head and liner exchange is often performed to treat this complication. Early management of PJI is cited to offer a higher success rate. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and timing of I&D for PJI in THA. Methods: We reviewed the records of 39 patients that underwent a THA between January 5th, 2009 and October 30th, 2014 who subsequently had an I&D with a head and liner exchange to treat a PJI. Date of THA and date of I&D with ahead and liner exchange were recorded. Success was measured by the need for any additional procedure due to persistent infection. Results: The average time between THA and I&D with a head and liner exchange was 48 days. Successful I&Ds took place an average of 46.8 days after the initial THA while unsuccessful I&Ds were performed 51.6 days after the initial THA. The difference, however, was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate the average time to I&D with a head and liner exchange was shorter for those who had a successful outcome but the difference between the two groups was not significant. A short time interval between arthroplasty and I&D is recommended by most authors but our results did not support this view

We retrospectively reviewed 161 revision THAs with diaphyseal fitting, mid-modular femoral components performed by ten surgeons at two academic medical centers. The average follow-up was 6.1years. At final follow-up, 4 patients required re-revision for failure of the femoral component; 3 (2%) for aseptic loosening and 1 for mechanical failure of stem in setting of periprosthetic fracture. There were a total of 24 (14.9%) revisions for any reason, with the most common reason being septic failure (10 of 24). To our knowledge, this is the largest reported series of mid-term survivorship and complications of revision THA with mid-modular femoral components. Our results show that these stems have a low rate of aseptic loosening, subsidence, and mechanical failure.

Pain control after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is integral in the immediate postoperative period for early rehabilitation. Numerous different methods of postoperative analgesia are available, but each has its own risk of adverse side effects. This study was performed to prospectively evaluate the benefits of an intra-articular analgesic injection in patients undergoing bilateral TKA.Thirty consecutive patients undergoing bilateral TKA were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, controlled study. Each patient was randomized to receive (1) a perioperative intra-articular mixture of morphine, bupivacaine with epinephrine, and ketorolac in 1 knee, and (2) injectable sterile saline in the contralateral knee. Each patient acted as his or her own internal control. The pharmacologically injected knee had statistically significantly less pain immediately postoperatively when compared to the control knee and displayed significantly increased range of motion within the first week of rehabilitation.The use of an intraoperative intra-articular injection with the above drug combination significantly reduces patient pain and increases postoperative mobility with no apparent risks following bilateral TKA

The combination of acetabular bone loss and hip instability is challenging. Sixteen patients underwent revision total hip arthroplasty using constrained acetabular liners cemented into cages. The average follow-up was 28 months (range, 24-60 months). Clinical evaluation was obtained using the Harris hip score along with radiographic data. At latest follow-up, 13 patients were available for evaluation. Although the average postoperative Harris hip score was 62 points, which was better than the preoperative score of 27 points, the overall radiographic failure rate was 23%. The combination of poor acetabular bone stock and altered stresses from the increased constraint likely led to the poor outcome. We would only recommend use of a cemented, constrained acetabular liner in combination with a protrusio cage as a bail out or salvage procedure.

This study consists of a single case report of a patient who had an irreducible obturator dislocation of a total hip arthroplasty after a motor vehicle accident, not previously described in the English literature. In particular, the focus will be on offering an educated opinion on the risk factors for dislocation and difficulties encountered with this type of dislocation. The aim is to offer valuable insight based on the operative experience with this patient and to supplement the literature with the management of such a complication following total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: Recently, intra-articular viscosupplementation with hyaluronate-derived products has gained popularity as a palliative modality for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Mild pain or swelling at the site of injection may occur in up to 20% of patients, although severe local inflammation, warmth, and joint effusion are rare. We present a series of six cases in which granulomatous inflammation of the synovium was observed after hyaluronate viscosupplementation of the knee. METHODS: Six knees (five patients) treated with intra-articular Hylan G-F 20 viscosupplementation underwent a surgical procedure because of persistent symptoms. Routine histopathological evaluation, supplemented by alcian-blue staining and hyaluronidase digestion, was performed in each case. RESULTS: Chronically inflamed synovium with areas of histiocytic and foreign-body giant-cell reaction was observed surrounding acellular, amorphous material. The material stained with alcian blue, a stain for hyaluronate, which disappeared after hyaluronidase digestion. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the injected hyaluronate (Hylan G-F 20) may have been responsible for the synovitis in our patients and thus may be a pathological cause of recalcitrant symptoms after such injection. It is not known whether the responsible pathological agent was the hyaluronate derivative, a contaminant of the purification process, or a component of the carrier substance. Importantly, it appears that the findings in these patients most likely represent a previously unreported pathological response to a viscosupplementation product. This report should raise clinical awareness about this potential complication