Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:The Bipolarity Index is a clinician-rated scale that rates cardinal features of the disorder across five domains: signs and symptoms, age of onset, course of illness, response to treatment, and family history. We tested the Index in routine clinical practice to identify the optimal cut-off for distinguishing bipolar from non-bipolar disorders. METHOD/METHODS:Sequential patients in a private practice were rated with the Bipolarity Index (n=1903) at intake. Diagnoses were made with the MINI-6.0.0 International Neuropsychiatric Interview according to DSM-IV-TR criteria, except that cases of antidepressant-induced mania and hypomania were included in the bipolar group. A subset completed the self-rated Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) (n=1620) or Bipolar Spectrum Diagnostic Scale (BSDS) (n=1179). The primary analysis compared Bipolarity Index scores for bipolar vs. non-bipolar patients using receiver operator curves (ROC) to determine the optimal cut-off score. Secondary outcomes repeated this analysis with the MDQ, MDQ-7 (using only the symptomatic items of the MDQ) and BSDS. RESULTS:At a cut-off of ≥50, the Bipolarity Index had a high sensitivity (0.91) and specificity (0.90). Optimal cut-offs for self-rated scales were: MDQ: ≥7 (sensitivity 0.74, specificity 0.71); MDQ-7: ≥6 (sensitivity 0.77, specificity 0.77); BSDS: ≥12 (sensitivity 0.71, specificity 0.77). LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:The study utilized one rater at a single practice site; the rater was not blinded to the results of the MINI. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The Bipolarity Index can enhance the clinical assessment of mood disorders and, at a score ≥50 has good sensitivity and specificity for identifying bipolar disorders.

OBJECTIVE:To investigate the safety of rechallenge with lamotrigine after an initial rash in patients with refractory bipolar depression. DESIGN/METHODS:1) Prospective, open-label case series in a private practice setting. Patients who developed an initial rash on lamotrigine and were refractory to other treatments were offered rechallenge with the drug using very-low-dose titration (5mg every other day or daily for 14 days, then raised every 14 days by daily-dose increments of 5mg; after 25mg/day the titration proceeded according to the manufacturer's guidelines); and 2) A meta-analysis of prior reports of rechallenge with lamotrigine was conducted. MEASURES/METHODS:A rating scale for rash severity was developed for this study. RESULTS:Of 27 patients rechallenged with lamotrigine, five required discontinuation due to rash or inflammation. Two of these were potentially serious and all resolved with discontinuation of lamotrigine. Review of the literature identified 48 cases of lamotrigine rechallenge with a success rate of 87 percent; in pooled analysis with the current study the success rate was 85 percent. No patients developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis after rechallenge. The rate of rash was elevated when rechallenge began within four weeks of the initial rash (36% vs. 7%, p=0.002) and reduced when the initial rash had no signs of potential seriousness (0% vs. 23%, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Rechallenge is a viable option after a benign rash on lamotrigine and can be undertaken with more caution after rashes with 1 to 2 signs of potential seriousness. For rashes with three or more signs of seriousness, rechallenge is not well-studied and may carry significant risk. Rechallenge should be avoided within four weeks of the initial rash.

OBJECTIVE:To assess the risks and benefits of pramipexole in psychiatric populations. DATA SOURCES/METHODS:A PubMed search was performed using the keywords pramipexole and ropinirole, which identified 500 articles. STUDY SELECTION/METHODS:All clinical studies in psychiatric populations were included in the primary review (24 articles). Studies involving other populations were then reviewed to evaluate potential risks and benefits not identified in the psychiatric studies. DATA EXTRACTION/METHODS:Effect sizes were calculated from controlled studies. Rates of intolerable side effects and manic switching were estimated by pooled analysis of controlled and uncontrolled studies. DATA SYNTHESIS/RESULTS:Pramipexole has a large effect size (0.6-1.1) in the treatment of both bipolar and unipolar depression with a low short-term rate of manic switching in bipolar patients (1% mania, 5% hypomania). The pooled discontinuation rate for all reasons was 9%. Pramipexole is neuroprotective and exerts beneficial effects on sleep architecture. Pramipexole is associated with 3 rare but serious side effects: sleep attacks, which have only occurred in Parkinson's disease; compulsive behaviors and pathologic gambling, which have occurred in Parkinson's disease and restless legs syndrome; and psychosis, which has occurred in both psychiatric and neurologic populations. CONCLUSIONS:Pramipexole is an important therapeutic option for treatment-resistant bipolar and unipolar depression; further studies are warranted to evaluate its safety in psychiatric patients.