Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

person:awosot01

in-biosketch:true

Total Results:

3


A case of vaginal adenosis with gastric differentiation [Case Report]

Awosogba, Temitope P; Whitney, Janelle; Broder, Jennifer C; McKee, Andrea; Paquette, Cherie; Nitschmann, Caroline C
•Vaginal adenosis is a non-obligate pre-cursor for vaginal clear cell carcinoma.•Vaginal adenosis is rare and presents with a variety of signs and symptoms.•Unclear link between adenosis and carcinoma without diethylstilbestrol exposure.•Surveillance with physical examinations, imaging and biopsies is recommended.
PMCID:7691171
PMID: 33294576
ISSN: 2352-5789
CID: 4704232

Gynecologic Outcomes After Hysteroscopic and Laparoscopic Sterilization Procedures

Perkins, Rebecca B; Morgan, Jake R; Awosogba, Temitope P; Ramanadhan, Shaalini; Paasche-Orlow, Michael K
OBJECTIVE:To compare rates of gynecologic morbidity after laparoscopic and hysteroscopic sterilization. METHODS:This retrospective cohort study used a commercial claims administrative database, 2007-2013, to compare rates of pregnancy, menstrual dysfunction, pelvic pain, hysteroscopic surgery, and intra-abdominal gynecologic surgery after laparoscopic and hysteroscopic sterilization. Women with 12 or more continuous months of data before and after their index procedure were included. Pregnancy rates after laparoscopic and hysteroscopic sterilization were compared for the entire population of women who underwent hysteroscopic sterilization and the subset who had completed postprocedure hysterosalpingograms. Cox proportional hazard models were calculated controlling for age, comorbidities, U.S. geographic region, metropolitan statistical area designation, and insurance type. RESULTS:A total of 42,391 women underwent laparoscopic and 27,724 underwent hysteroscopic sterilization. The pregnancy rate was higher after hysteroscopic than laparoscopic sterilization (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.33; 2.4% compared with 2.0% risk of pregnancy at 2 years). Only 66.1% (n=18,318) of women who underwent hysteroscopic sterilization received a hysterosalpingogram. This group had similar pregnancy rates as those who underwent laparoscopic sterilization (adjusted HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80-1.02; 1.8% compared with 2.0% at 2 years). After undergoing hysteroscopic sterilization, more women were diagnosed with menstrual dysfunction (adjusted HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.20-1.27; 26.8% compared with 22.3% at 2 years), and more women underwent hysteroscopic surgeries (adjusted HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.96-2.14; 13.8% compared with 6.4% at 2 years), but fewer women were diagnosed with pelvic pain (adjusted HR 0.83, P<.001; 21.0% compared with 25.6% at 2 years) and fewer women underwent intra-abdominal gynecologic surgeries (adjusted HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90-0.99; 7.7% compared with 8.1% at 2 years), including hysterectomy (adjusted HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.61-0.69; 10.9% compared with 14.3% at 5 years). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Hysteroscopic sterilization may be associated with a higher rate of pregnancy, more menstrual dysfunction, more hysteroscopic surgeries, less pelvic pain, and fewer intra-abdominal gynecologic surgeries than laparoscopic sterilization. Pregnancy rates appear to be similar for women who completed their postprocedure hysterosalpingogram, but only 66% of women did so.
PMID: 27607866
ISSN: 1873-233x
CID: 3090252

Prioritizing health disparities in medical education to improve care

Awosogba, Temitope; Betancourt, Joseph R; Conyers, F Garrett; Estape, Estela S; Francois, Fritz; Gard, Sabrina J; Kaufman, Arthur; Lunn, Mitchell R; Nivet, Marc A; Oppenheim, Joel D; Pomeroy, Claire; Yeung, Howa
Despite yearly advances in life-saving and preventive medicine, as well as strategic approaches by governmental and social agencies and groups, significant disparities remain in health, health quality, and access to health care within the United States. The determinants of these disparities include baseline health status, race and ethnicity, culture, gender identity and expression, socioeconomic status, region or geography, sexual orientation, and age. In order to renew the commitment of the medical community to address health disparities, particularly at the medical school level, we must remind ourselves of the roles of doctors and medical schools as the gatekeepers and the value setters for medicine. Within those roles are responsibilities toward the social mission of working to eliminate health disparities. This effort will require partnerships with communities as well as with academic centers to actively develop and to implement diversity and inclusion strategies. Besides improving the diversity of trainees in the pipeline, access to health care can be improved, and awareness can be raised regarding population-based health inequalities.
PMCID:4598316
PMID: 23659676
ISSN: 0077-8923
CID: 371282