Faculty Bibliography

Post-mastectomy pain syndrome and the less well-described post-breast surgery pain syndrome are long-term neuropathic pain conditions that may affect more than 50% of patients after mastectomy and breast surgery. While the etiology, risk factors, and management have been reviewed in our literature, we offer here a focused outline that will gear the plastic surgeon with tools to lead a multidisciplinary, algorithmic approach to the care of patients with post-mastectomy pain syndrome/post-breast surgery pain syndrome. After reading this article, we hope the reader will have improved awareness of post-mastectomy pain syndrome/post-breast surgery pain syndrome, and thus be able to incorporate appropriate treatments and preventative steps into their primary surgical routine.

BACKGROUND:Preoperative abdominal computed tomographic angiograms for free flap breast reconstruction improve operative safety and efficiency, but incidental findings are common and potentially affect management. In addition, the authors hypothesized that patients with genetic mutations might have a higher rate of significant findings. The authors present the largest series of computed tomographic angiogram "incidentalomas" in these two populations and an evidence-based algorithm for managing common findings. METHODS:All patients undergoing free flap breast reconstruction at Northwell Health between 2009 and 2017 were eligible. Medical history, perioperative details, and radiology reports were examined with abnormal findings recorded. Published literature was reviewed with radiologists to develop standardized guidelines for incidentaloma management. RESULTS:Of 805 patients included, 733 patients had abdominal imaging. One hundred ninety-five (27 percent) had a completely negative examination. In the remaining 538 patients, benign hepatic (22 percent) and renal (17 percent) findings were most common. Sixteen patients (2.2 percent) required additional imaging (n = 15) or procedures (n = 5). One finding was concerning for malignancy-renal cell carcinoma-which interventional radiology ablated postoperatively. Seventy-nine patients (10.8 percent) had a genetic mutation but were not found to have a statistically significant higher rate of incidentalomas. CONCLUSIONS:The authors' rate of computed tomographic angiography incidental findings (73 percent) is consistent with previous studies, but the rate requiring further intervention (2.2 percent) is lower. Incidental findings were no more common or pathologic among genetic mutation carriers. The authors also introduce an evidence-based algorithm for the management of common incidentalomas. Using these guidelines, plastic surgeons can reassure patients, regardless of mutation status, that incidentalomas are most commonly benign and have minimal impact on their surgical plan.

BACKGROUND:Donor site complications are a significant source of morbidity for patients undergoing abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction, but there is a paucity of data regarding minimizing these postoperative complications. We hypothesize that selective ablation of the umbilicus at the time of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) harvest decreases the incidence of umbilical and abdominal wall complications in high-risk patients. METHODS:A retrospective review was performed of all patients (n = 117) who underwent DIEP harvest with concomitant umbilical ablation from 2010 to 2015. This cohort was paired with 117 patients who underwent DIEP harvest without umbilical ablation. Preoperative risk factors, intraoperative factors, and postoperative complications were compared. RESULTS:The umbilical ablation group had significantly higher body mass index (30.9 vs 27.4 kg/m, P < 0.001), presence of umbilical scar (20.9% vs 5.3%, P < 0.001), umbilical hernia (82.9% vs 8.5% P < 0.001), ventral hernia (23.9% vs 1.7%, P < 0.001), and rectus diastasis (10.3% vs 2.6%, P = 0.016). There were no significant differences of smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, prior abdominal surgery, or midline abdominal scar. The umbilical ablation group had a significantly lower rate of postoperative abdominal wound dehiscence and skin loss (11.1% vs 22.2%, P = 0.023) and overall donor site complications (24.8% vs 39.3%, P = 0.017). There was no significant difference in incidence of cellulitis, seroma, or abscess. Mean follow-up time was 1.8 years. CONCLUSIONS:Selective umbilical ablation in high-risk patients at the time of abdominal flap harvest can result in significantly fewer donor site wound complications, even in the setting of increased risk factors for poor wound healing. This is likely due to avoidance of umbilical incisions and decreased upper abdominal skin undermining. We conclude that umbilical ablation is a viable option to minimize donor site complications, especially in high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND:Breast reconstruction with the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) free flap continues to gain popularity among reconstructive surgeons. The low risk for abdominal wall morbidity must be weighed against the higher concern for thrombotic events. The aim of this study was to review the authors' recent experience with the SIEA flap and investigate whether their previously published incidences of vessel thrombosis and flap loss were related to their own "learning curve" or whether these adverse events are attributable to inherent qualities of the SIEA flap. METHODS:The authors performed a retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing SIEA flap surgery between January 1, 2008, and July 1, 2014, at their institution. All included operations were performed by the senior author (J.M.S.). The main outcomes of interest included vessel thrombosis and partial/full flap loss. RESULTS:Forty-seven SIEA flaps were performed on 39 patients. Sixty-four percent (n = 30) were immediate reconstructions and 79 percent (n = 37) were bilateral. There were five intraoperative arterial thromboses (10.6 percent) and one intraoperative venous thrombosis (2.1 percent), with eight total thrombotic events (17.0 percent). One total flap loss (2.1 percent) and two partial flap losses (4.3 percent) were experienced. CONCLUSIONS:The authors' recent experience with SIEA-based breast reconstruction shows a similar incidence of thrombotic events and flap loss compared with the authors' early experience. These incidences remain greater than what is seen with other abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction techniques and do not appear to be attributable to an operator learning curve. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic, IV.

Tissue expansion using implantable expanders is a useful means of generating surplus tissue for reconstruction of defects such as scarring following burns. The authors describe their technique of incisions distant to the desired location of expander placement, and remote dissection of the expander pocket with hydrodissection and blunt forceps. A total of 81 expanders were placed in 30 consecutive patients, 81% of whom had burn scars due for reconstruction. During preparation, no complications, such as bleeding, were encountered, except one case with severe subdermal fibrosis, in which bleeding was stopped through brief application of pressure. Postoperatively, no complications were encountered in 76% of patients; however, 16.6% exhibited surgical site infection, which was managed conservatively and was correlated with a high number of expanders implanted at once. One patient experienced hematoma formation that resolved spontaneously, and one instance of expander extrusion and subsequent removal occurred. Receiving ≥2 expanders at the same time was statistically associated with higher risk for complication(s). The authors' complication rates were moderate and comparable with open or endoscopic approaches. Time of expansion is reduced compared with the open approach due to distant incision placement and immediate usability. Cost effectiveness appeared to be better using only inexpensive forceps, rather than elaborate and costly endoscopic equipment.

Modification of the lengthening temporalis myoplasty for reanimation of facial paralysis is presented. A patient experienced traumatic laceration of the left facial nerve resulting in left hemifacial paralysis. Multiple attempts at nerve repair were unsuccessful. For smile restoration, a Labbé procedure was performed. Because of inadequate length, the temporalis tendon could not be directly secured to the modiolus. Therefore, an inferiorly based temporalis fascia flap was recruited from the deep temporal fascia and reflected inferiorly to provide additional length by which the tendon could be secured to the modiolus. This technique provided immediate smile restoration and required no additional donor site.