Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) are widely used in the treatment of patients with hypertension. However, their efficacy in hypertensive blacks when compared with other antihypertensive agents is not well established. METHODS: Cohort study of patients using data from a clinical data warehouse of 434,646 patients from New York City's Health and Hospitals Corporation (HHC) from January 2004 - December 2009. Patients were divided into the following comparison groups: ACEi vs. Calcium Channel Blocker (CCB); ACEi vs. thiazide diuretics and ACEi vs. beta-blockers. Primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction or stroke. Secondary outcomes include the individual components and heart failure. RESULTS: In the propensity score matched ACEi vs. CCB comparison cohort (4,506 blacks in each group), ACEi was associated with higher risk of primary outcome (HR=1.45; 95% CI 1.19, 1.77; P=0.0003), myocardial infarction (HR=3.40; 95% CI 1.25, 9.22; P=0.02), stroke (HR=1.82; 95% CI 1.29, 2.57; P=0.001) and heart failure (HR=1.77; 95% CI 1.30, 2.42; P=0.0003) when compared with CCB. For the ACEi vs. thiazide diuretics comparison (5,337 blacks in each group), ACEi was associated with higher risk of primary outcome (HR=1.65; 95% CI 1.33, 2.05; P<0.0001), death (HR=1.35; 95% CI 1.03, 1.76; P=0.03), myocardial infarction (HR=4.00; 95% CI 1.34, 11.96; P=0.01), stroke (HR=1.97; 95% CI 1.34, 2.92; P=0.001) and heart failure (HR=3.00; 95% CI 1.99, 4.54; P<0.0001). For the ACEi vs. beta-blocker comparison, the outcomes between the groups were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world cohort of hypertensive blacks, ACEi was associated with higher risk of cardiovascular events when compared with CCB or thiazide diuretics.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trial evidence suggests poorer outcomes in blacks compared with whites when treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor-based regimen, but this has not been evaluated in clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the comparative effectiveness of an ACE inhibitor-based regimen on a composite outcome of all-cause mortality, stroke, and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in hypertensive blacks compared with whites. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 434,646 patients in a municipal health care system. Four exposure groups (Black-ACE, Black-NoACE, White-ACE, White-NoACE) were created based on race and treatment exposure (ACE or NoACE). Risk of the composite outcome and its components was compared across treatment groups and race using weighted Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Our analysis included 59,316 new users of ACE inhibitors, 47% of whom were black. Baseline characteristics were comparable for all groups after inverse probability weighting adjustment. For the composite outcome, the race treatment interaction was significant (p = 0.04); ACE use in blacks was associated with poorer cardiovascular outcomes (ACE vs. NoACE: 8.69% vs. 7.74%; p = 0.05) but not in whites (6.40% vs. 6.74%; p = 0.37). Similarly, the Black-ACE group had higher rates of AMI (0.46% vs. 0.26%; p = 0.04), stroke (2.43% vs. 1.93%; p = 0.05), and congestive heart failure (3.75% vs. 2.25%; p < 0.0001) than the Black-NoACE group. However, the Black-ACE group was no more likely to develop adverse effects than the White-ACE group. CONCLUSIONS: ACE inhibitor-based therapy was associated with poorer cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive blacks but not in whites. These findings confirm clinical trial evidence that hypertensive blacks have poorer outcomes than whites when treated with an ACE inhibitor-based regimen.

We studied 63 randomly selected third-year students who split their 10-week medicine clerkship between ambulatory and inpatient components. Compared with their inpatient experience, during the ambulatory rotation, the 63 students felt more like doctors, more responsible for patients, and more able to know and help their patients. Students reported that ambulatory attending staff appeared happier and less stressed, and did not embarrass them as frequently. Compared with their 619 "inpatient" classmates, these 63 "ambulatory" students scored as well on the medicine examination, and were as likely to receive honors (44% vs 41%), and to choose internal medicine residencies (35% vs 34%). In conclusion, students experienced better relationships with their patients and teachers during the ambulatory rotation, which was academically comparable to the inpatient experience.

Two groups of 24 subjects each attempted to discriminate between large elastic and resistive loads during 50 randomized presentations of each load. Breathers inspired from the loads through a J valve, whereas pullers reciprocally stroked the plunger of a 2-liter syringe connected to the J valve. A range of load durations was obtained in each subject by prematurely unloading approximately one-half of the trials at graded times from their onset. Breathers produced random discrimination scores [50.8 +/- 2.5% (SE) correct] when loaded inspirations were shorter than unloaded inspirations [trials in which both loads induced equal airway pressure (and probably respiratory muscle tension) waveforms] and nonrandom discrimination scores (65.7 +/- 2.8% correct) when loaded inspirations were longer than unloaded inspirations (trials in which both loads induced different waveforms). In contrast, pullers produced nonrandom discrimination scores (62.2 +/- 2.9% correct) when loaded airflow durations were shorter than unloaded inspirations [trials in which both loads induced equal line pressure (and therefore limb muscle tension) waveforms]. Supplemental audio feedback related to instantaneous airflow (an expression of movement) improved load perception in breathers (to 64.2 +/- 3.0% correct; P < 0.01), indicating that airflow feedback introduced load-specific information that was lacking during breathing but redundant during pulling. In support of this hypothesis, airflow feedback by itself enabled a third group of listeners to identify load type with equal accuracy as pullers but with greater accuracy than breathers. These findings suggest that 1) uniformed subjects rely heavily on feedback from airway pressure and/or muscle tension receptors to perceive added loads to breathing and 2) limb mechanoreceptors provide a more sensitive appreciation of movement than do respiratory mechanoreceptors