Faculty Bibliography

Individual patients with depression present with unique symptom clusters - before, during, and even after treatment. The prevalence of persistent, unresolved symptoms and their contribution to patient functioning and disease progression emphasize the importance of finding the right treatment choice at the onset and the utility of switching medications based on suboptimal responses. Our primary goal as clinicians is to improve patient function and quality of life. In fact, feelings of well-being and the return to premorbid levels of functioning are frequently rated by patients as being more important than symptom relief. However, functional improvements often lag behind resolution of mood, attributed in large part to persistent and functionally impairing symptoms - namely, fatigue, sleep/wake disturbance, and cognitive dysfunction. Thus, patient outcomes can be optimized by deconstructing each patient's depressive profile to its component symptoms and specifically targeting those domains that differentially limit patient function. This article will provide an evidence-based framework within which clinicians may tailor pharmacotherapy to patient symptomatology for improved treatment outcomes.

Background: Research during the past few decades has provided substantial evidence indicating that excessive sleepiness (ES) and associated sleep/wake disorders can result in significant morbidity and mortality. However, symptomatology (e.g., ES) and the relationships among common morbidities (e.g., cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, mood impairment) and sleep/wake disorders remain under-recognized in clinical practice, particularly in primary care. Yet assessment of sleep/wakefulness and associated symptoms can often be easily conducted in the primary care setting, providing valuable information to facilitate the diagnosis and management of sleep/wake disorders. Objective: To provide a conceptual and educational framework that helps primary care physicians comprehensively assess, differentially diagnosis, and appropriately manage patients presenting with ES or ES-related sleep/wake disorders. Methods: Comprised of six sleep specialists and six primary care physicians, the Sleep/Wake Disorders Working Group (SWG) used a modified, two-round Delphi approach to create and harmonize consensus recommendations for the assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing management of patients with common sleep/wake disorders related to ES. Results: After a review of the relevant literature, the SWG arrived at consensus on a number of clinical recommendations for the assessment and management ES and some of the most commonly associated sleep/wake disorders. Ten consensus statements--five each for assessment/diagnosis and treatment/ ongoing care--were created for ES, insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea, circadian rhythm disorders, restless legs syndrome, and narcolepsy. Conclusion: ES and ES-related sleep/wake disorders are commonly encountered in the primary care setting. By providing an educational framework for primary care physicians, the SWG hopes to improve patient outcomes by emphasizing recognition, prompt diagnosis, and appropriate ongoing management of ES and associated sleep/ wake disorders.

Management of chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) requires a comprehensive assessment of the patient, the institution of a structured treatment regimen, an ongoing reassessment of the painful condition and its response to therapy, and a continual appraisal of the patient's adherence to treatment. For many patients with CNCP, the analgesic regimen will include opioids. Physicians should consider the available evidence of efficacy, the routes of administration, and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the various formulations as they relate to the temporal characteristics of the patient's pain. When making initial decisions, physicians should decide whether to prescribe a short-acting opioid (SAO) with a relatively quick onset of action and short duration of analgesic activity, a long-acting opioid (LAO) with a longer duration of analgesic action but a potentially longer onset of action, or both. Studies suggest that SAOs and LAOs are both effective for most types of CNCP. A review of published studies found no data to suggest that either SAOs or LAOs are generally more efficacious for treating any particular CNCP condition. The LAOs may provide more stable analgesia with less frequent dosing; however, opioid therapy should be tailored to the pain state and the individual patient, and SAOs may be appropriate for some patients with CNCP. MEDLINE and PubMed searches were conducted to locate relevant studies published from January 1975 to April 2008 using the following search terms: opioids, short-acting opioids, long-acting opioids, chronic pain, chronic pain AND opioids, and narcotics. English-only randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies were considered.