Faculty Bibliography

To determine whether an opt-out approach is effective for referral to treatment for tobacco use, we designed a clinical reminder for nurses in a primary care setting that provides a referral for patients who smoke cigarettes. We will use a two-arm, cluster-randomized design to assign nurses at the VA New York Harbor Healthcare System to test which mode of referral (opt-in vs opt-out) is more effective. All patients will be referred to evidence-based treatment for tobacco cessation including counseling from the New York State Quitline, and VetsQuit, a text messaging-based system for tobacco cessation counseling. We will measure patient engagement with the referral both in the short and long term to determine if referral modality had an impact on tobacco cessation treatment. We will also measure nurse engagement with the referral before, during, and after the implementation of the reminder to determine whether an opt-out approach is cost effective at the health system level. At the conclusion of this project, we expect to have developed and tested an opt-out system for increasing tobacco cessation treatment for Veterans in VA primary care and to have a thorough understanding of factors associated with implementation. Trial Registration:Clinicaltrials.govIdentifierNCT03477435.

Needs and Objectives: Didactic training in motivation interviewing (MI) lacks efficacy, because opportunities to practice skills while being directly observed are rare. The goal of our educational innovation was to train interns in the advanced communication skills of motivation interviewing through a group observed standardized clinical experience (GOSCE). Our Learning Objectives were as follows: After an experiential learning session on MI, interns will be able to: 1. Identify opportunities to use MI with patients 2. Recognize "change talk" from a patient as an opportunity to use MI techniques 3. Use MI techniques when discussing behavior change with a patient Setting and Participants: 46 internal medicine interns in an academic internal medicine residency program. Description: Each session began with a 20 minute review of MI for behavior change given by a psychologist trained in Motivational Interviewing. Then, interns participated in a 3 station, one-hour long Group Observed Standardized Clinical Exercise (GOSCE). Interns worked in teams of 3, and for each station, one of the 3 interns was the active physician, while the other 2 observed the encounter. Each intern had an opportunity to be the active physician for a case. Each case was observed by one or two faculty members, one of whom was a psychologist trained in MI. After a 10 minute interaction with the standardized patient, the active physician received feedback on their MI skills and debriefed the encounter with the faculty and their peers. After the 3 cases, the session concluded with a group debrief and summary of the experience. Interns completed a retrospective pre/post survey to assess the impact of the session. Evaluation: Residents reported statistically significant improvement in all domains, including confidence with identifying opportunities to use MI, comfort using reflective and summary statements during MI, and likelihood of using motivational interviewing in future patient encounters. Qualitative comments after the session reflect that residents developed an appreciation for silence as a tool during MI, felt comfortable with tools such as decisional balance, and recognized the value of patient centered-ness during MI. Discussion/Reflection/Lessons Learned: Our interprofessional educational team (psychologists and internists) provided different perspective for both learners and our internal medicine faculty. Our residents appreciated practicing skills and receiving feedback in real time. This academic year (one year after the intern GOSCE), these same learners will participate in an OSCE that includes a case requiring motivational internviewing skills, and we will evaluate the durability of motivation interviewing skills taught during this session. We are interested in expanding opportunities to use GOSCE as a low stakes skills practice and development tool

BACKGROUND:Obesity is a worldwide epidemic, and its prevalence is higher among Veterans in the United States. Based on our prior research, primary care teams at a Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital do not feel well-equipped to deliver effective weight management counseling and often lack sufficient time. Further, effective and intensive lifestyle-based weight management programs (e.g. VA MOVE! program) are underutilized despite implementation of systematic screening and referral at all VA sites. The 5As behavior change model (Assess, Advise, Agree, Assist, Arrange) is endorsed by the United States Preventive Service Task Force for use in counseling patients about weight management in primary care and reimbursed by Medicare. In this paper, we describe the iterative development of a technology-assisted intervention designed to provide primary care-based 5As counseling within Patient-Centered Medical Homes without overburdening providers/healthcare teams. METHODS:Thematic analyses of prior formative work (focus groups with patients [n = 54] and key informant interviews with staff [n = 25]) helped to create a technology-assisted, health coaching intervention called Goals for Eating and Moving (GEM). To further develop the intervention, we then conducted two rounds of testing with previous formative study participants (n = 5 for Round 1, n = 5 for Round 2). Each session included usability testing of prototypes of the online GEM tool, pilot testing of 5As counseling by a Health Coach, and a post-session open-ended interview. RESULTS:Three main themes emerged from usability data analyses: participants' emotional responses, tool language, and health literacy. Findings from both rounds of usability testing, pilot testing, as well as the open-ended interview data, were used to finalize protocols for the full intervention in the clinic setting to be conducted with Version 3 of the GEM tool. CONCLUSIONS:The use of qualitative research methods and user-centered design approaches enabled timely detection of salient issues to make iterative improvements to the intervention. Future studies will determine whether this intervention can increase enrollment in intensive weight management programs and promote clinically meaningful weight loss in both Veterans and in other patient populations and health systems.

Introduction: Bariatric surgery is associated with improvement of obesity related co-morbidities. Some studies suggest that these patients may be susceptible to alcohol abuse due to alteration in metabolism. Aim of this study was to assess the impact of bariatric surgery on high risk alcohol use in a meta-analysis of the published data. Methods: MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception through September 2016 with MeSH terms "alcohol", "substance abuse", "outcomes", and "bariatric surgery". Dual extraction and quality assessment of studies was performed independently by two authors. Inclusion criteria were retrospective and prospective studies reporting long-term outcomes (>12 months) after bariatric procedures, with >100 patients in a cohort, and reporting rates of alcohol use as per the AUDIT, dSCID criteria and data from inpatient alcohol treatment. Primary outcomes included the pooled event rate and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for significant alcohol use after bariatric surgery, new-onset significant alcohol use after bariatric surgery and odds ratio comparing rates of alcohol abuse before and after surgery. Results: 565 citations were identified;12 prospective and 16 retrospective or cross-sectional cohort studies including 15,714 subjects were analyzed. Average follow-up was 2.6 years(range 0.08-10 years). Average age of participants ranged from 26.5-50.1 years, with 76.8% female. Majority of patients had undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and fewer had laparoscopic gastric banding/other restrictive procedures. New-onset significant alcohol use was identified in 8% of patients after bariatric surgery . 19% of patients had significant alcohol use prior to bariatric surgery, event rate 0.19(95% CI 0.12-0.28,18 studies,4697 patients). 23% of patients had significant alcohol abuse after bariatric surgery; event rate 0.23(95% CI 0.14-0.34, I2=97%, Tau2=1.5,19 studies,4552 patients). Patients had higher odds of significant alcohol use after surgery than before, OR 1.5(95% CI 1.07-2.11, I2=89%, Tau2=0.3,11 studies,3370 patients). Conclusion: Bariatric surgery is associated with significant increase in moderate to high-risk alcohol use/abuse with a new-onset incidence of 8%. Additionally, 19% of patients overall reported problem drinking prior to surgery. Thus, better selection of patients and further studies to identify modifiable factors are needed to decrease the substantial burden of high-risk alcohol use after bariatric surgery. (Table Presented)

INTRODUCTION: The impact of sexual violence (SV) on mental health, self-care, and interpersonal relationships is profound and poses special challenges to health care delivery. Reproductive health care merits special attention because the care required may be linked to reminders of past abuse. We explored facilitators and barriers affecting the use of reproductive health services among women veterans with a history of SV. METHOD: Between June and September 2015, we conducted 2 focus groups and 3 general education sessions with 27 female veterans with a history of SV at 1 medical center. We analyzed transcripts according to applied thematic analysis and used Nvivo software for data management and retrieval. RESULTS: Three main themes emerged from the focus groups and education sessions. PARTICIPANTS: (a) expressed a desire for greater agency in relation to the control they have over their bodies and medical care; (b) described how posttraumatic stress symptoms are retriggered during medical care; and (c) expressed needs for additional education, peer and provider support within the medical system. DISCUSSION: For women with a history of SV, multiple individual and systemic barriers complicate how they utilize reproductive health services. Group education sessions were an effective mode of support, information and connection to other women within the Veterans Health Administration. (PsycINFO Database Record

Women with a history of sexual violence may face obstacles to obtaining preventive health services. Group education models have been used in other settings to improve knowledge and uptake of care. Focus groups were conducted to solicit the concerns and input of the subject population. Interdisciplinary group education sessions (GESs) were designed specifically to address concerns voiced in focus groups. GESs were conducted, addressing mammograms, pelvic examinations, and menopause, and emphasized preventive health education, as well as shared decision-making. GESs were audio recorded and qualitative feedback was collected immediately after each GES. Surveys were administered before and after each GES to evaluate attitude and knowledge change. A total of 18 women attended the focus groups, and 27 women attended at least one GES, with 12 women attending both. GESs were well received, and participants cited the education, group support, and healing dynamic as benefits of participation. Content knowledge improved after all three GESs. Attitude change showed a trend toward improvement, but the sample size was not large enough to detect statistical significance. Group education is an acceptable and feasible model among survivors of sexual violence. GESs improved knowledge among this small group of participants. GESs could be made available in a wide range of topics, as requested by our participants. Larger studies are warranted to examine long-term knowledge and attitude change after GESs.

BACKGROUND: Food insecurity (FI) occurs when individuals or households have limited or uncertain access to adequate food. People with FI may find it particularly difficult to eat a balanced diet and manage weight. Individuals who report FI are 1.4 times more likely to have obesity. U.S. Veterans have a greater prevalence of FI compared with the general population (24% vs. 19%). As part of a pilot randomized controlled trial to test the impact of an obesity intervention for Veterans, we explored the prevalence of FI in our sample and assessed the impact of FI on weight outcomes. METHODS: Veterans with a Body Mass Index of greater than or equal to 30 or between 25 and 29.99 with at least one comorbidity were recruited by phone for a pilot study. Participants randomized to the intervention received a technology-assisted health coaching session and follow-up coaching calls; control participants received a VA "healthy living messages" pamphlet. At baseline and 3 months, participants had weight measurements and completed surveys. To measure FI, we used a 6-item Household Food Security Scale (FI = 2 or more affirmative responses). We assessed the impact of FI on variables independent of arm assignment in participants who returned for a 3-month measurement visit (Wilcoxon rank sum tests and Fisher's Exact Test). We also analyzed the role of FI as a moderator between arm and study variables using ANOVA. RESULTS: Out of 31 Veterans who enrolled in the study (Mean age = 53.48, 63% male, mean BMI = 31.72), 10 demonstrated FI at baseline and 25 participants completed 3 month measurements. Independent of the intervention, those with FI (n = 10) lost .01 kg of weight and those without FI (n = 15) lost 1.69 kg at 3-months but the difference was not significant (p = 0.2). Similarly, 0/10 Veterans with FI achieved 2.5% weight loss, compared to 4/15 of those without FI (p = 0.12). Those with FI in the control group gained weight when compared to those without FI (1.04 kg, SD = 1.41 vs. -1.75, SD = 3.96) and those with FI in the intervention lost the same amount of weight as those without FI (-1.59 kg, SD = 0.83, vs. -1.59, SD = 2.27; p = 0.24 for the interaction (not significant)). CONCLUSIONS: FI in Veterans enrolled in a weight management study is high. Participants with FI in the control arm may have gained weight when compared to non-FI participants, while intervention arm participants with FI lost similar amounts of weight to those without FI. This suggests that the intervention may reduce the negative impact of FI. While this pilot study was not powered to show a significant difference, we have amended health coaching protocols to better address FI in our intervention (e.g. screening for FI and linking participants with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits and similar resources) hoping to maximize its effectiveness