Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a neuromodulation technology capable of targeted stimulation and inhibition of cortical areas. Repetitive TMS (rTMS) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of several neuropsychiatric disorders, and novel uses of rTMS for neurorehabilitation in patients with acute and chronic neurologic deficits are being investigated. However, studies to date have primarily focused on neurorehabilitation in stroke patients, with little data supporting its use for neurorehabilitation in brain tumor patients. METHODS:We performed a review of the current available literature regarding uses of rTMS for neurorehabilitation in post-operative neuro-oncologic patients. RESULTS:Data have demonstrated that rTMS is safe in the post-operative neuro-oncologic patient population, with minimal adverse effects and no documented seizures. The current evidence also demonstrates potential effectiveness in terms of neurorehabilitation of motor and language deficits. CONCLUSIONS:Although data are overall limited, both safety and effectiveness have been demonstrated for the use of rTMS for neurorehabilitation in the neuro-oncologic population. More randomized controlled trials and specific comparisons of contralateral versus ipsilateral rTMS protocols should be explored. Further work may also focus on individualized, patient-specific TMS treatment protocols for optimal functional recovery.

OBJECTIVE:Stimulated Raman histology (SRH) offers efficient and accurate intraoperative neuropathological tissue analysis without procedural alteration to the diagnostic specimen. However, there are limited data demonstrating one-to-one tissue comparisons between SRH and traditional frozen sectioning. This study explores the non-inferiority of SRH as compared to frozen section on the same piece of tissue in neurosurgical patients. METHODS:Tissue was collected over a 1-month period from 18 patients who underwent resection of central nervous system lesions. SRH and frozen section analyses were compared for diagnostic capabilities as well as assessed for quality and condition of tissue via a survey completed by pathologists. RESULTS:SRH was sufficient for diagnosis in 78% of specimens as compared to 94% of specimens by frozen section of the same specimen. A Fisher's exact test determined there was no significant difference in diagnostic capability between the two groups. Additionally, both quality of SRH and condition of tissue after SRH were deemed to be non-inferior to frozen section. CONCLUSIONS:This study provides further evidence for the non-inferiority of SRH techniques. It is also the first study to demonstrate SRH accuracy using one-to-one tissue analysis in neuropathological specimens.

A global effort is underway to distribute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines to limit the crisis. Although adverse events related to vaccination are rare, there have been cases of new-onset neurologic symptoms following vaccination. We present two cases of new-onset neurologic symptoms post-vaccination that, upon further workup, revealed two different neuro-oncologic processes requiring neurosurgical intervention and further treatment. We hypothesize that despite these processes being unrelated to vaccination, the COVID-19 vaccines may induce an inflammatory cascade with the ability to uncover underlying sinister pathology. Our report therefore emphasizes the need for careful evaluation in the setting of new-onset neurologic symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination.

Diffuse midline glioma with histone H3 lysine27-to-methionine mutation (H3 K27M mutation) is a rare, aggressive tumor that is designated as World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV regardless of histologic features. Preoperative diagnosis remains challenging due to limited evidence regarding distinctive clinical and imaging characteristics. We describe the case of a young woman who presented with progressively worsening headaches due to communicating hydrocephalus. MR imaging with contrast of the cervical and thoracic spine revealed diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement with focal areas of intramedullary and subarachnoid T2 hyperintensity and enhancement, suggestive of a potential infectious process. Intraoperatively, no epidural pathology was identified, and with the differential diagnosis remaining broad, a second procedure was conducted involving intradural exploration and biopsy of a lesion. This was then identified as a diffuse midline glioma with H3 K27M mutation. The nonfocal clinical presentation in the setting of communicating hydrocephalus as well as the significant exophytic tumor growth and imaging findings made the initial diagnosis unique and challenging. This case, therefore, emphasizes the rare presentation of this tumor, and the need for further understanding of the clinical and imaging characteristics of this disease as well as the need for effective therapeutics.

Anatomic anomalies of the aortic arch have implications for clinical practice if their significance is understood. Our case study involves a cadaveric finding of the left vertebral artery originating directly from the aortic arch. Although this anatomical variation has been documented, the prevalence of this anomaly may be generally underestimated. After noting this anomaly, we analyzed 27 cases and found that four female cadavers had the left vertebral artery originating from the aortic arch rather than the left subclavian artery. With a prevalence rate of 14.8%, it would seem that this anomaly is more significant than previously thought, which could have implications for surgical practice.