Faculty Bibliography

The safety and efficacy expectations for U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (DRs) are described in laws that broadly apply to all prescription drugs and biologic products. These laws also outline efficacy expectations that are unique for DRs. The FDA regulations and guidance documents elaborate on DR efficacy expectations for clinical uses of the drugs, such as the delineation of anatomy, the characterization of a physiologic process, or the diagnosis of disease. As described in the FDA regulations, the approval of a DR necessitates that the imaging drug has the ability to provide clinically useful information. Here we cite approved DRs to illustrate how the imaging performance of the drugs was characterized in clinical studies and the clinical usefulness of the imaging information described in drug labels.

In 2007, the Food and Drug Administration requested that manufacturers of all approved gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), drugs widely used in magnetic resonance imaging, use nearly identical text in their product labeling to describe the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). Accumulating information about NSF risks led to revision of the labeling text for all of these drugs in 2010. The present report summarizes the basis and purpose of this class-labeling approach and describes some of the related challenges, given the evolutionary nature of the NSF risk evidence. The class-labeling approach for presentation of product risk is designed to decrease the occurrence of NSF and to enhance the safe use of GBCAs in radiologic practice.(c) RSNA, 2012.