Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Patients with relapsed intracranial germinoma can achieve durable remission with standard chemotherapy regimens and/or reirradiation; however, innovative therapies are required for patients with relapsed and/or refractory intracranial nongerminomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs) due to their poor prognosis. Improved outcomes have been reported using reinduction chemotherapy to achieve minimal residual disease, followed by marrow-ablative chemotherapy (HDCx) with autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell rescue (AuHPCR). We conducted a phase II trial evaluating the response and toxicity of a 3-drug combination developed for recurrent intracranial germ cell tumors consisting of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and oxaliplatin (GemPOx). METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 9 patients with confirmed relapsed or refractory intracranial GCT were enrolled after signing informed consent, and received at least 2 cycles of GemPOx, of which all but 1 had relapsed or refractory NGGCTs. One patient with progressive disease was found to have pathologically confirmed malignant transformation to pure embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (without GCT elements), hence was ineligible and not included in the analysis. Patients who experienced sufficient responses proceeded to receive HDCx with AuHPCR. Treatment response was determined based on radiographic tumor assessments and tumor markers. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 7 patients achieved sufficient response and proceeded with HDCx and AuHPCR, and 5 subsequently received additional radiotherapy. A total of 2 patients developed progressive disease while receiving GemPOx. Myelosuppression and transaminitis were the most common treatment-related adverse events. With a mean follow-up of 44 months, 4 patients (3 NGGCTs, 1 germinoma) are alive without evidence of disease. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:GemPOx demonstrates efficacy in facilitating stem cell mobilization, thus facilitating the feasibility of both HDCx and radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND:This study evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral ONC201 administered twice-weekly on consecutive days (D1D2) in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed DIPG and/or recurrent/refractory H3 K27M glioma. METHODS:This phase 1 dose-escalation and expansion study included pediatric patients with H3 K27M-mutant glioma and/or DIPG following ≥1 line of therapy (NCT03416530). ONC201 was administered D1D2 at three dose levels (DLs; -1, 1, and 2). Actual administered dose within DLs was dependent on weight. Safety was assessed in all DLs; PK analysis was conducted in DL2. Patients receiving once-weekly ONC201 (D1) served as a PK comparator.1. RESULTS:Twelve patients received D1D2 ONC201 (DL-1, n=3; DL1, n=3; DL2, n=6); no dose-limiting toxicities or grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred. PK analyses at DL2 (D1-250mg, n=3; D1-625mg, n=3; D1D2-250mg, n=2; D1D2-625mg, n=2) demonstrated variability in Cmax, AUC0-24, and AUC0-48, with comparable exposures across weight groups. No accumulation occurred with D1D2 dosing; the majority of ONC201 cleared before administration of the second dose. Cmax was variable between groups but did not appear to increase with D1D2 dosing. AUC0-48 was greater with D1D2 than once-weekly. CONCLUSIONS:ONC201 given D1D2 was well-tolerated at all DLs and associated with greater AUC0-48.

Current strategies to treat pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia rely on risk stratification algorithms using categorical data. We investigated whether using continuous variables assigned different weights would improve risk stratification. We developed and validated a multivariable Cox model for relapse-free survival (RFS) using information from 21199 patients. We constructed risk groups by identifying cutoffs of the COG Prognostic Index (PI_COG) that maximized discrimination of the predictive model. Patients with higher PI_COG have higher predicted relapse risk. The PI_COG reliably discriminates patients with low vs. high relapse risk. For those with moderate relapse risk using current COG risk classification, the PI_COG identifies subgroups with varying 5-year RFS. Among current COG standard-risk average patients, PI_COG identifies low and intermediate risk groups with 96% and 90% RFS, respectively. Similarly, amongst current COG high-risk patients, PI_COG identifies four groups ranging from 96% to 66% RFS, providing additional discrimination for future treatment stratification. When coupled with traditional algorithms, the novel PI_COG can more accurately risk stratify patients, identifying groups with better outcomes who may benefit from less intensive therapy, and those who have high relapse risk needing innovative approaches for cure.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Histone 3 (H3) K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma (DMG) has a dismal prognosis with no established effective therapy beyond radiation. This integrated analysis evaluated single-agent ONC201 (dordaviprone), a first-in-class imipridone, in recurrent H3 K27M-mutant DMG. METHODS:Fifty patients (pediatric, n = 4; adult, n = 46) with recurrent H3 K27M-mutant DMG who received oral ONC201 monotherapy in four clinical trials or one expanded access protocol were included. Eligible patients had measurable disease by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) high-grade glioma (HGG) criteria and performance score (PS) ≥60 and were ≥90 days from radiation; pontine and spinal tumors were ineligible. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) by RANO-HGG criteria. Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), time to response (TTR), corticosteroid response, PS response, and ORR by RANO low-grade glioma (LGG) criteria. Radiographic end points were assessed by dual-reader, blinded independent central review. RESULTS:The ORR (RANO-HGG) was 20.0% (95% CI, 10.0 to 33.7). The median TTR was 8.3 months (range, 1.9-15.9); the median DOR was 11.2 months (95% CI, 3.8 to not reached). The ORR by combined RANO-HGG/LGG criteria was 30.0% (95% CI, 17.9 to 44.6). A ≥50% corticosteroid dose reduction occurred in 7 of 15 evaluable patients (46.7% [95% CI, 21.3 to 73.4]); PS improvement occurred in 6 of 34 evaluable patients (20.6% [95% CI, 8.7 to 37.9]). Grade 3 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TR-TEAEs) occurred in 20.0% of patients; the most common was fatigue (n = 5; 10%); no grade 4 TR-TEAEs, deaths, or discontinuations occurred. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:ONC201 monotherapy was well tolerated and exhibited durable and clinically meaningful efficacy in recurrent H3 K27M-mutant DMG.

Osteonecrosis is a significant toxicity of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy. In retrospective analyses, superior event-free survival was noted among affected adolescents in an earlier trial. We prospectively assessed osteonecrosis incidence, characteristics, and risk factors in patients 1-30 years with newly diagnosed high-risk B-ALL on COG AALL0232. Patients were randomized to induction dexamethasone vs prednisone, and interim maintenance high-dose methotrexate vs escalating-dose Capizzi methotrexate/pegaspargase. Event-free and overall survival were compared between patients with/without imaging-confirmed osteonecrosis. Osteonecrosis developed in 322/2730 eligible, evaluable patients. The 5-year cumulative incidence was 12.2%. Risk was greater in patients ≥10 years (hazard ratio [HR], 7.23; P < 0.0001), particularly females (HR, 1.37; P = 0.0057), but lower in those with asparaginase allergy (HR, 0.60; P = 0.0077). Among rapid early responders ≥10 years, risk was greater with dexamethasone (HR, 1.84; P = 0.0003) and with prednisone/Capizzi (HR, 1.45; P = 0.044), even though neither therapy was independently associated with improved survival. Patients with osteonecrosis had higher 5-year event-free (HR, 0.51; P < 0.0001) and overall survival (HR, 0.42; P < 0.0001), and this was directly attributable to reduced relapse rates (HR, 0.57; P = 0.0014). Osteonecrosis in high-risk B-ALL patients is associated with improved survival, suggesting an important role for host factors in mediating both toxicity and enhanced efficacy of specific therapies.

UNLABELLED:DNA methylation is an essential molecular assay for central nervous system (CNS) tumor diagnostics. While some fusions define specific brain tumors, others occur across many different diagnoses. We performed a retrospective analysis of 219 primary CNS tumors with whole genome DNA methylation and RNA next-generation sequencing. DNA methylation profiling results were compared with RNAseq detected gene fusions. We detected 105 rare fusions involving 31 driver genes, including 23 fusions previously not implicated in brain tumors. In addition, we identified 6 multi-fusion tumors. Rare fusions and multi-fusion events can impact the diagnostic accuracy of DNA methylation by decreasing confidence in the result, such as BRAF, RAF, or FGFR1 fusions, or result in a complete mismatch, such as NTRK, EWSR1, FGFR, and ALK fusions. IMPLICATIONS/UNASSIGNED:DNA methylation signatures need to be interpreted in the context of pathology and discordant results warrant testing for novel and rare gene fusions.

Mutations in genes encoding epigenetic regulators are commonly observed at relapse in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Loss-of-function mutations in SETD2, an H3K36 methyltransferase, have been observed in B-ALL and other cancers. Previous studies on mutated SETD2 in solid tumors and acute myelogenous leukemia support a role in promoting resistance to DNA damaging agents. We did not observe chemoresistance, an impaired DNA damage response, nor increased mutation frequency in response to thiopurines using CRISPR-mediated knockout in wild-type B-ALL cell lines. Likewise, restoration of SETD2 in cell lines with hemizygous mutations did not increase sensitivity. SETD2 mutations affected the chromatin landscape and transcriptional output that was unique to each cell line. Collectively our data does not support a role for SETD2 mutations in driving clonal evolution and relapse in B-ALL, which is consistent with the lack of enrichment of SETD2 mutations at relapse in most studies.

The early thymic precursor (ETP) immunophenotype was previously reported to confer poor outcome in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). Between 2009 and 2014, 1256 newly diagnosed children and young adults enrolled in Children's Oncology Group (COG) AALL0434 were assessed for ETP status and minimal residual disease (MRD) using flow cytometry at a central reference laboratory. The subject phenotypes were categorized as ETP (n = 145; 11.5%), near-ETP (n = 209; 16.7%), or non-ETP (n = 902; 71.8%). Despite higher rates of induction failure for ETP (6.2%) and near-ETP (6.2%) than non-ETP (1.2%; P < .0001), all 3 groups showed excellent 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS): ETP (80.4% ± 3.9% and 86.8 ± 3.4%, respectively), near-ETP (81.1% ± 3.3% and 89.6% ± 2.6%, respectively), and non-ETP (85.3% ± 1.4% and 90.0% ± 1.2%, respectively; P = .1679 and P = .3297, respectively). There was no difference in EFS or OS for subjects with a day-29 MRD <0.01% vs 0.01% to 0.1%. However, day-29 MRD ≥0.1% was associated with inferior EFS and OS for patients with near-ETP and non-ETP, but not for those with ETP. For subjects with day-29 MRD ≥1%, end-consolidation MRD ≥0.01% was a striking predictor of inferior EFS (80.9% ± 4.1% vs 52.4% ± 8.1%, respectively; P = .0001). When considered as a single variable, subjects with all 3 T-ALL phenotypes had similar outcomes and subjects with persistent postinduction disease had inferior outcomes, regardless of their ETP phenotype. This clinical trial was registered at AALL0434 as #NCT00408005.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Historically, patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) who fail to achieve remission at the end of induction (EOI) have had poor long-term survival. The goal of this study was to examine the efficacy of contemporary therapy, including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in first remission (CR1). METHODS:Induction failure (IF) was defined as the persistence of at least 5% bone marrow (BM) lymphoblasts and/or extramedullary disease after 4-6 weeks of induction chemotherapy. Disease features and clinical outcomes were reported in 325 of 6,167 (5%) patients age 21 years and younger treated in 14 cooperative study groups between 2000 and 2018. RESULTS:= .10, respectively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Outcomes for patients age 21 years and younger with T-ALL and IF have improved in the contemporary treatment era with a DFS benefit among those undergoing HSCT in CR1. However, outcomes still lag considerably behind those who achieve remission at EOI, warranting investigation of new treatment approaches.