Faculty Bibliography

Aspirates of mediastinal neoplasms pose a unique diagnostic challenge due to the overlapping histologic characteristics of mediastinal lesions and the morphologic similarities between mediastinal neoplasms and those originating at other sites. Presented here is the first reported description of the cytomorphologic features of adenocarcinoma NOS of the thymus in aspirate and pleural effusion specimens. The morphologic similarities between thymic and metastatic adenocarcinomas and variable immunohistochemical staining patterns of thymic epithelial neoplasms underscore the importance of pathology-radiology correlation and the careful consideration of the clinical context in the interpretation of cytology specimens.

Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are relatively common breast lesions on the same spectrum of disease. Atypical ductal hyperblasia is a nonmalignant, high-risk lesion, and DCIS is a noninvasive malignancy. While a benefit of screening mammography is early cancer detection, it also leads to increased biopsy diagnosis of noninvasive lesions. Previously, treatment guidelines for both entities included surgical excision because of the risk of upgrade to invasive cancer after surgery and risk of progression to invasive cancer for DCIS. However, this universal management approach is not optimal for all patients because most lesions are not upgraded after surgery. Furthermore, some DCIS lesions do not progress to clinically significant invasive cancer. Overtreatment of high-risk lesions and DCIS is considered a burden on patients and clinicians and is a strain on the health care system. Extensive research has identified many potential histologic, clinical, and imaging factors that may predict ADH and DCIS upgrade and thereby help clinicians select which patients should undergo surgery and which may be appropriate for active surveillance (AS) with imaging. Additionally, multiple clinical trials are currently underway to evaluate whether AS for DCIS is feasible for a select group of patients. Recent advances in MRI, artificial intelligence, and molecular markers may also have an important role to play in stratifying patients and delineating best management guidelines. This review article discusses the available evidence regarding the feasibility and limitations of AS for ADH and DCIS, as well as recent advances in patient risk stratification.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Our study assesses whether the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) offers any benefit over the original cytology classification, and measures interobserver agreement. METHODS:Four cytopathologists retrospectively blindly classified preoperative cytology by MSRSGC from 101 resected salivary tumors. Consensus MSRSGC diagnoses were correlated with surgical pathology diagnoses and compared with the original cytology classification. Diagnostic parameters were calculated for both systems. Interobserver variability was assessed. RESULTS:The original cytology classification vs MSRSGC had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 75.0% vs 78.3%, 97.1% vs 98.0%, 91.2% vs 94.7%, and 90.1% vs 90.0%, respectively. The original cytology classification risk of neoplasm (RON) was 91.7% for "negative for malignancy" and 100.0% for other categories. The MSRSGC RON was 71.4% in category II (nonneoplastic) and 100.0% in all other categories. The original cytology classification risk of malignancy (ROM) ranged from 0.0% for "atypical" to 100.0% for "positive for malignancy." The MSRSGC ROM ranged from 0.0% in categories I (nondiagnostic) and III (nonneoplastic) to 100.0% in category VI (malignant). Weighted agreement using the MSRSGC was 92% (Gwet AC1, 0.84); unweighted agreement was 69% (Gwet AC1, 0.64). MSRSGC category IVA (benign neoplasm) was most likely to show interobserver agreement, with complete agreement in 67% of cases. CONCLUSIONS:The MSRSGC performs similarly to the original cytology classification and shows relatively high interobserver agreement.

Myopericytomas are uncommon tumors defined by their round to spindle shaped cells often arranged in a concentric pattern of perivascular growth. They are typically well-circumscribed, nodular, slow-growing lesions that occur in the soft tissue of the extremities. Here, we present a 30-year-old female with a 2.4 cm myopericytoma occurring in the deep lobe of the parotid gland. The diagnosis was made with detailed histopathologic and immunohistochemical findings and positive identification of the specific mutation for PDGFRβ p.Asp666Lys by next generation sequencing (NGS). This is the first case report of a parotid myopericytoma with a genetic testing that shows a particular mutation that has been linked to myopericytomatosis.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:There is no consensus for interpretation of p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) in cytology preparations. Our study aims to assess p16 IHC staining in formalin-fixed cytology cell blocks (CBs) from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens in comparison with surgical pathology p16 staining and to determine the reproducibility of p16 IHC scoring in CBs. METHODS:) was calculated to assess inter-rater reliability. RESULTS:= 0.79 (95% CI: 0.61-0.98). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:p16 IHC performed on cytology CBs can serve as a surrogate marker for the detection of HPV with high sensitivity and specificity levels. Using a threshold lower than that recommended for surgical pathology for the interpretation of p16 positivity may be appropriate for FNA cytology CB preparations. All cytopathologists in our study displayed reproducible high sensitivity and specificity values at the >10% threshold.

Primary mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the breast is a rare neoplasm with few reports in the literature. Here, we report for the first time a comprehensive genetic profile of a primary mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the breast, using next-generation sequencing 580 cancer-associated gene panel. Mutations in TP53, RB1, and BAP1 were identified. The findings suggest that this tumor is driven mostly by abnormalities in tumor suppressor genes, primarily involved in cell cycle control and chromatin remodeling. Molecular characterization of additional primary mucinous cystadenocarcinomas of the breast is warranted and might provide information related to its biology and behavior.

Background: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of salivary gland lesions is a fast, minimally invasive and cost-effective procedure that aids in early patient management decisions. Recently, the Milan System for reporting Salivary Gland cytopathology (MSRSGC) was published in order to establish diagnostic categories with implied malignancy risks and recommended clinical follow-up. Our study aims to assess the interobserver reproducibility of salivary gland cytology diagnoses using the MSRSGC.
Design(s): Salivary gland cytology slides from 101 cases with surgical pathology follow-up from 11/2016-06/2019 were blindly and independently reviewed and classified according to the MSRSGC by four cytopathologists. Unweighted and linearly weighted percent agreement and Gwet's AC1 coefficients were calculated in AgreeStat 2015.6/Windows (AgreeStat Analytics).
Result(s): Unweighted percent agreement was 0.69 (substantial agreement) and weighted percent agreement was 0.92 (almost perfect agreement). Unweighted Gwet's AC1 was 0.64 (substantial agreement), and weighted Gwet's AC1 was 0.84 (almost perfect agreement) (Table 1). 50 of 101 (49%) cases had complete agreement among all 4 observers, 77 (76%) had at least 3 observers agreeing on the same diagnosis, and 99 (98%) had at least 2 observers agreeing on the same diagnosis. Category IVA (benign neoplasm) was the most likely to show interobserver agreement: among the 51 cases in which at least 2 cytopathologists agreed on a diagnosis of category IVA, 34 (67%) showed complete agreement among all 4 cytopathologists. Two cases showed no agreement among any observers. One low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma had MSRSGC diagnoses ranging from I to IVB, and one secretory carcinoma had MSRSGC diagnoses ranging from III to VI. Low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma is reportedly the most common malignant salivary gland tumor associated with false-negative diagnoses on cytology and is often misdiagnosed as a pleomorphic adenoma, due to the presence of bland-appearing intermediate cells as well as confusion between mucin and chondromyxoid stroma (Figure 1). The case of secretory carcinoma showed scant cellularity on cytology, confounding an accurate diagnosis (Figure 2).
Conclusion(s): Interobserver reliability analyses using the MSRSGC showed substantial to almost perfect agreement among the four observers in our study. Only two cases showed no agreement. Category IVA (benign neoplasm) is the most likely to show complete agreement among all observers

Introduction: Recent studies evaluating p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) in cell blocks (CB) of fine needle aspirations (FNAs) in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OP-SCC) have shown good correlation between cytology and surgical pathology. Our study aimed to determine the reproducibility of p16 IHC scoring in CBs. Additionally, we evaluated whether interobserver variability would significantly affect the optimal threshold for p16 IHC positivity in CBs.
Material(s) and Method(s): 40 FNAs from 2014-2019 of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with p16 IHC were obtained. Surgical pathology p16 IHC results were set as reference. p16 IHC stained CBs were scored independently by 5 cytopathologists and recorded as percentage of tumor cell positivity: 0%,0-1%,1-10%,10-50%,50-70%,70%. AgreeStat2015.6/Windows software was used to calculate the percent agreement (Pa) and Gwet's AC1 statistic to assess inter-rater reliability. ROC curves were examined to determine optimal cutoffs for each pathologist based on sensitivity and specificity values (IBM SPSS version 25).
Result(s): Overall performances of the raters were similar, with areas under the curve (AUCs) ranging from 0.88-0.95 (Figure 1). >10% appeared to be the optimal threshold for p16 positivity because this was the lowest threshold to reach 100% specificity with high sensitivity (55-84%) in all 5 raters. Using the >10% as threshold, the Pa was 86% (95% CI 0.78-0.94) and Gwet's AC1 coefficient was 0.72 (95% CI 0.56-0.89).
Conclusion(s): While the goal in developing guidelines for the interpretation of p16 IHC on cytology CBs is to provide generalizable standards for all cytopathologists, interobserver variability must be taken into account. Prior studies have shown optimal cutoffs ranging from >0% (any staining) to >70%, with sensitivity and specificity values ranging from 37%-100%. While our study did not show perfect agreement, all cytopathologists in our study displayed reproducible high sensitivity and specificity values at the >10% threshold with a percent agreement of 86%. [Formula presented]
Copyright