Faculty Bibliography

Conventionally, nanocarriers are used to regulate the controlled release of therapeutic payloads. Increasingly, they can also be designed to have an intrinsic therapeutic effect. For example, a positively charged nanocarrier can bind damage-associated molecular patterns, inhibiting toll-like receptor (TLR) pathway activation and thus modulating inflammation. These nucleic acid-binding nanomaterials (NABNs), which scavenge pro-inflammatory stimuli, exist in diverse forms, ranging from soluble polymers to nanoparticles and 2D nanosheets. Unlike conventional drugs that primarily address inflammation symptoms, these NABPs target the upstream inflammation initiation pathway by removing the agonists responsible for inflammation. Many NABNs have demonstrated effectiveness in murine models of inflammatory diseases. However, these scavengers have not been systematically studied and compared within a single setting. Herein, we screen a subset of the most potent NABNs to define their relative efficiency in scavenging cell-free nucleic acids and inhibiting various TLR pathways. This study helps interpret existing in vivo results and provides insights into the future design of anti-inflammatory nanocarriers.

Conventionally, nanocarriers are used to regulate the controlled release of therapeutic payloads. Increasingly, they can also be designed to have an intrinsic therapeutic effect. For example, a positively charged nanocarrier can bind damage-associated molecular patterns, inhibiting toll-like receptor (TLR) pathway activation and thus modulating inflammation. These nucleic acid-binding nanomaterials (NABNs), which scavenge pro-inflammatory stimuli, exist in diverse forms, ranging from soluble polymers to nanoparticles and 2D nanosheets. Unlike conventional drugs that primarily address inflammation symptoms, these NABPs target the upstream inflammation initiation pathway by removing the agonists responsible for inflammation. Many NABNs have demonstrated effectiveness in murine models of inflammatory diseases. However, these scavengers have not been systematically studied and compared within a single setting. Herein, we screen a subset of the most potent NABNs to define their relative efficiency in scavenging cell-free nucleic acids and inhibiting various TLR pathways. This study helps interpret existing in vivo results and provides insights into the future design of anti-inflammatory nanocarriers.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The KNee OsteoArthritis Prediction (KNOAP2020) challenge was organized to objectively compare methods for the prediction of incident symptomatic radiographic knee osteoarthritis within 78 months on a test set with blinded ground truth. DESIGN/METHODS:The challenge participants were free to use any available data sources to train their models. A test set of 423 knees from the Prevention of Knee Osteoarthritis in Overweight Females (PROOF) study consisting of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and X-ray image data along with clinical risk factors at baseline was made available to all challenge participants. The ground truth outcomes, i.e., which knees developed incident symptomatic radiographic knee osteoarthritis (according to the combined ACR criteria) within 78 months, were not provided to the participants. To assess the performance of the submitted models, we used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROCAUC) and balanced accuracy (BACC). RESULTS:Seven teams submitted 23 entries in total. A majority of the algorithms were trained on data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. The model with the highest ROCAUC (0.64 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57-0.70)) used deep learning to extract information from X-ray images combined with clinical variables. The model with the highest BACC (0.59 (95% CI: 0.52-0.65)) ensembled three different models that used automatically extracted X-ray and MRI features along with clinical variables. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The KNOAP2020 challenge established a benchmark for predicting incident symptomatic radiographic knee osteoarthritis. Accurate prediction of incident symptomatic radiographic knee osteoarthritis is a complex and still unsolved problem requiring additional investigation.

OBJECTIVE:Chronic pain is highly prevalent among patients with mood, anxiety, personality, and somatic symptom disorders; and patients with chronic pain often suffer from persistent interpersonal distress. However, the neural mechanisms underlying this phenomenon and its possible role in the etiology of chronic pain are not yet understood. Based on our Developmental Theory of Centralized/Somatoform Pain, and prior research suggesting the existence of a shared neural system subserving interpersonal emotions and pain, we aimed to identify the neural basis for modulation of pain by feelings of interpersonal rejection and the role of the early interpersonal environment in development of this shared neural system. METHODS:During fMRI scanning, 22 healthy participants received moderately painful thermal stimuli in 3 interpersonal contexts: Acceptance, Rejection, and Reacceptance (modified Cyberball paradigm). Early interpersonal environment was assessed using the Parental Bonding Instrument. RESULTS:Interpersonal context modulated activity in pain neural systems during rejection and during accepting interactions with previously rejecting others. Moreover, the subjective perception of rejection, even when rejection was not occurring, correlated positively with reported pain severity and neural activity in the insula. The magnitude of neural modulation in pain circuits by feelings of rejection was associated with the quality of early interpersonal experience with caregivers. CONCLUSIONS:Results suggest that interpersonal emotions play an important role in the development and functioning of the pain system, supporting our Developmental Theory of predisposition to chronic centralized pain. These findings have direct implications for clinical practice, including the importance of treating interpersonal distress to alleviate pain.

Reviews the book, Essentials of Autism Spectrum Disorders Evaluation and Assessment by Celine A. Saulnier and Pamela E. Ventola (see record 2012-17480-000). This book is really designed to help busy mental health professionals quickly acquire the knowledge and references they need to make optimal use of the major psychological assessment tests or test results for patients with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Different parts in the book are devoted to a particular field, and they use an easy-to-follow format for rapid reference. The first part of the book describing the spectrum disorders in detail and the differences among the various diagnoses, and also explains the DSM change in Asperger's syndrome. Another part of the book clearly lays out a lot of the basic types of assessments for developmental, cognitive, behavioral, and neuropsychological profiles, and explains briefly and smoothly the purpose of each of these categories. Overall, the book is an ideal addition to a busy clinical practice, as an informative and easy-to-read book for clinicians or student clinicians who assess or work with children with ASD, and a useful supplement to any arsenal of books on assessment.

The apolipoprotein epsilon4 allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is associated with earlier age of onset. The incidence of spontaneous seizures has been reported to be increased in sporadic AD as well as in the early onset autosomal dominant forms of AD. We now report the emergence of a seizure phenotype in aged apolipoprotein E4 (apoE4) targeted replacement (TR) mice but not in age-matched apoE2 TR or apoE3 TR mice. Tonic-clonic seizures developed spontaneously after 5months of age in apoE4 TR mice and are triggered by mild stress. Female mice had increased seizure penetrance compared to male mice, but had slightly reduced overall seizure severity. The majority of seizures were characterized by head and neck jerks, but 25% of aged apoE4 TR mice had more severe tonic-clonic seizures which occasionally progressed to tonic extension and death. Aged apoE4 TR mice progressed through pentylenetetrazol-induced seizure stages more rapidly than did apoE3 TR and apoE2 TR mice. Electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings revealed more frequent bursts of synchronous theta activity in the hippocampus of apoE4 TR mice than in apoE2 TR or apoE3 TR mice. Cortical EEG recordings also revealed sharp spikes and other abnormalities in apoE4 TR mice. Taken together, these findings demonstrate the emergence of an age-dependent seizure phenotype in old apoE4 TR mice in the absence of human amyloid-beta peptide (Abeta) overexpression, suggesting increased central nervous system neural network excitability.

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects a large number of children. For decades, the stimulants have been the mainstay of pharmacological treatment for ADHD. Dexmethylphenidate (d-MPH), the d-isomer of the traditional racemic mixtures of d,l-threo-(R,R)-MPH, was recently introduced as another potential option in the stimulant class of medications. This paper reviews and summarizes the available research literature on d-MPH regarding pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, chemical structure, receptor binding, toxicology, and clinical perspectives. d-MPH potentially may offer some advantages in the realms of absorption and duration of action compared with its racemic counterpart. The differences in pharmacokinetics and clinical implications of the immediate-release and extended-release forms of d-MPH are also compared and contrasted

The stimulants have been the mainstay of pharmacologic treatment for over fifty years. Methylphenidate is the most frequently prescribed of the stimulant agents. In the past, one of the main drawbacks of these agents was the abbreviated duration of action. Over the last few years three longer acting methylphenidate preparations have been released to the market. Though all these agents contain the same chemical compound they do vary in a number of ways. In this article we will present how the formulations compare in their technology and the differences in their delivery systems. We will also compare the available literature that focus on head to head comparisons in terms of pharmacokinetics studies and those reports that present efficacy data. Finally, we will suggest based on a theoretical framework on how to approach selecting an agent based on the results of these trials and the individual needs of the patient