Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:In this study, the authors aim to compare perceptions of remote learning versus in-person learning among faculty and trainees at a single institution during the COVID-19 pandemic and to evaluate the impact that a brief faculty training on best practices in online teaching would have on faculty attitudes towards remote learning. METHODS:The authors conducted an attitude survey on remote learning among trainees and faculty members approximately 3 months after the transition from in-person to remote learning. The authors then conducted a faculty training on best practices in online teaching followed by an evaluation survey. Study findings were examined descriptively and by Fisher's exact testing. RESULTS:The response rates for the attitudes survey were 68% among trainees and 61% among faculty. Trainees and faculty perceived in-person learning more favorably than remote learning across a variety of domains, including overall enjoyment, interpersonal connection, ability to communicate, and concentration. Despite these trends, only 10% of trainees and 14% of faculty felt that all lectures would be most effectively delivered in-person when this becomes possible again. The response rate for the faculty training evaluation survey was 16%. Compared to non-attendees, faculty attendees reported more confidence in their ability to teach remotely (89% vs 56%, p=0.02) but not increased optimism (89% vs 63%, p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS:The study findings suggest that both trainees and faculty perceive remote learning negatively compared to in-person learning but still feel that some lectures should be delivered remotely even after a return to in-person learning is possible.

BACKGROUND:There is a need for biomarkers that can classify optic neuritis (ON) attacks as belonging to either neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder with optic neuritis (NMOSD-ON) or relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis with optic neuritis (MS-ON). This study uses spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) data to perform a preliminary contrast between NMOSD-ON and MS-ON by analyzing peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and intra-macular layer patterns of injury. METHODS:In this cross-sectional study, we used SD-OCT to obtain peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and intra-macular layer data for 26 NMOSD-ON, 25 MS-ON, and 26 healthy control (HC) age-matched eyes. Additionally, sub-comparisons compared 11 NMOSD-ON eyes that were seronegative for IgG antibodies against aquaporin 4 (NMOSD-ON (-)) and 16 NMOSD-ON eyes that were seropositive (NMOSD-ON (+)) to age-matched MS-ON eyes. Layer thicknesses were assessed using an automated algorithm and were then statistically compared using generalized estimating equations to account for inter-eye correlations. RESULTS:Selective thinning was found in the pRNFL, mRNFL, and GCL in NMOSD-ON compared to MS-ON. Thinning in the pRNFL nasal sector was found to persist in both NMOSD-ON (-) (P=0.017) and NMOSD-ON (+) (P=0.021) compared to MS-ON. Thinning in the mRNFL temporal sector was found to persist in NMOSD-ON (+) compared to MS-ON. Diffuse thinning was found in the pRNFL, mRNFL, GCL and IPL in NMOSD-ON compared to HC, and while diffuse thinning was also found in the GCL and IPL in MS-ON compared to HC, selective thinning was found in the pRNFL and mRNFL. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The nasal region of the pRNFL may be capable of distinguishing between NMOSD-ON and MS-ON regardless of antibody status. Additionally, NMOSD-ON may cause more profound nasal axonal and inferior arcuate neuronal degeneration compared to MS-ON.