Faculty Bibliography

NEEDS AND OBJECTIVES: Our annual residency retreat brainstorms innovations to meet needs. In 2010 needs were: to introduce foundation concepts and enable primary care (PC) residents to feel/be competent in clinic earlier; to spiral learning of core concepts, skills and attitudes from the start; and to have residents and faculty connect from the outset.We aim to equip PC clinicians to deliver bio-psychosocial, comprehensive, best evidence-based systems savvy care and to become change agents, leaders, and scholars. To meet these aims we designed a learner centered, team oriented, skills-based Essentials for PC Clinicians (EPIC) curriculum utilizing an initial, rigorous 4 week block with spiral reinforcement through 3 years. The innovation is a comprehensive, reproducible, effective method to ensure residents' progress on paths of clinical, humanistic, and intellectual excellence consistent with the generalist paradigm. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: EPIC is part of the NYU Internal Medicine PC Residency. Residents attend public hospital and community continuity clinics. 8 interns take the EPIC block and 24 residents spiral through the curriculum. DESCRIPTION: EPIC begins with a 4 week intern block dedicated to core topics in PC; is reinforced in precepting and subsequent blocks; and has a weekly EPIC conference where these topics are deepened and extended. EPIC Block: The overarching themes throughout the 4 weeks focus on understanding and practice of core skills: workshops/precepting on time management, efficient use of EHR, obtaining best practices, consultation, how one learns best, practice in the medical home and engaging community resources. Week 1 focuses on diabetes, and introduces the pillars: psychosocial medicine, evidence-based practice, and systems-based policy awareness and skill. The second week focuses on hypertension. The last 2 weeks introduce 7 common, high-risk high gain conditions from smoking to hepatitis B. Teaching methods combine group learning and reflective written exercises!

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether training improves physicians' obesity counseling. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of an obesity counseling curriculum for residents. DESIGN: A non-randomized, wait-list/control design. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three primary care internal medicine residents; 12 were assigned to the curriculum group, and 11 were assigned to the no-curriculum group. Over a 7-month period (1-8 months post-intervention) 163 of the residents' obese patients were interviewed after their medical visits. INTERVENTION: A 5-hour, multi-modal obesity counseling curriculum based on the 5As (Assess, Advise, Agree, Assist, Arrange) using didactics, role-playing, and standardized patients. MAIN MEASURES: Patient-report of physicians' use of the 5As was assessed using a structured interview survey. Main outcomes were whether obese patients were counseled about diet, exercise, or weight loss (rate of counseling) and the quality of counseling provided (percentage of 5As skills performed during the visit). Univariate statistics (t-tests) were used to compare the rate and quality of counseling in the two resident groups. Logistic and linear regression was used to isolate the impact of the curriculum after controlling for patient, physician, and visit characteristics. KEY RESULTS: A large percentage of patients seen by both groups of residents received counseling about their weight, diet, and/or exercise (over 70%), but the quality of counseling was low in both the curriculum and no curriculum groups (mean 36.6% vs. 31.2% of 19 possible 5As counseling strategies, p = 0.21). This difference was not significant. However, after controlling for patient, physician and visit characteristics, residents in the curriculum group appeared to provide significantly higher quality counseling than those in the control group (std beta = 0.18; R(2) change = 2.9%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Residents who received an obesity counseling curriculum were not more likely to counsel obese patients than residents who did not. Training, however, is associated with higher quality of counseling when patient, physician, and visit characteristics are taken into account