Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that same-day laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is superior to delayed elective cholecystectomy. Although this practice is ideal, it requires significant hospital resources, particularly for an underprivileged inner-city population at a large, municipal hospital. We sought to evaluate the implementation of same-day laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a large, municipal hospital and assess the possible benefits of decreasing preoperative length of stay (LOS), particularly its effect on operative time and length of stay in patients with acute cholecystitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients treated for symptomatic gallstone disease between September 2012 and November 2013. Medical records were reviewed, and relevant data points were collected. Univariate and multivariate regressions were performed to assess the correlation between time to operation (<36 h [no delay] or >36 h [delay]) and the main outcomes (operative time and total length of stay). Inclusion criteria were patients age >/=18 y who underwent same-admission cholecystectomy and had a diagnosis of cholecystitis on pathology. Eighty-eight patients met all inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) preoperative LOS was 76.2 (+/-48.6) h, the mean operative time was 2.3 (+/-1.1) h, and the mean postoperative LOS was 60.3 (+/-60.1) h. The average total LOS was 136 (+/-79.8) h. Operative times and postoperative LOS were similar for patients in the delay and no delay groups. Patients with >36 h wait before surgery had a total length of stay twice as long as patients with <36 h wait (152 versus 83.3 h; P = 0.0005). These findings remained significant when adjusted for age, sex, radiologic findings, number of preoperative tests, and pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Increased preoperative LOS is not associated with a significant increase in operative time. However, it was associated with significantly increased length of stay. Further analysis is needed to explore the potential cost savings of decreasing preoperative LOS.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer screening is a key component of primary care, and access to regular screening mammography (SMG) is highly dependent on recommendation and referral by a primary care provider (PCP). Women with no health insurance or who are underinsured often lack access to a regular PCP and thus access to routine screening. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 173 surgical patients diagnosed between January 2012 and December 2013. The main outcome variables were PCP status, method of cancer detection, and breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Additional variables included race, age at diagnosis, family history of breast and ovarian cancer, and medical comorbidities. RESULTS: Patients with a PCP received more mammograms (SMG) compared with patients without a PCP (61 vs. 37 %; p = 0.003). The majority (73 %) of patients without a PCP presented symptomatically with a palpable mass versus 42 % of patients with a PCP. A significant difference was noted with regard to final pathologic stage of breast cancer between the two groups (p = 0.019), and Caucasian and African American patients were more likely to have locally advanced breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Underserved patients with a PCP are more likely to present asymptomatically and at an earlier stage of breast cancer compared with patients without a PCP. Community engagement programs that build relationships with patients may help bring vulnerable patients into the healthcare system for routine screening. Moreover, PCP education regarding the subtleties of breast cancer screening guidelines and referral to a breast specialist is also critical in improving outcomes of underserved patients.

Objective: We sought to assess our experience between a private (TH) and a public hospital (BH), both staffed by faculty and trainees of the same major university medical center. Methods: Our gastric cancer database was used to identify patients undergoing curative intent resection. Descriptive statistics were used to compare demographic data. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to examine recurrence (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with RFS and OS. Data were risk - and disease stage-stratified. Results: There were 100 patients in the BH group and 242 in the TH group, with a median age 55 and 70.5 years respectively (p<0.001). The majority of BH patients were Asians (60, 60%), and Caucasians (172, 72.3%) in the TH group. The median number of days from diagnosis to surgical intervention at BH was 47.5 vs. 30 days in the TH (p=0.01). BH group had a smaller BMI and more frequently received distal or subtotal gastrectomy. Perioperative morbidity and mortality was equally distributed, as was 30-day readmission rate. Pathologic staging was similarly distributed. By multivariate analysis, hospital of treatment was not associated with RFS (p=0.48) nor OS (p=0.56). Conclusions: Patients receiving care for gastric cancer at major public hospitals have equally good clinical outcomes when compared to patients treated at private hospitals, if cared for by physicians within the same institution dedicated to disease specific entities. Overall survival by treatment hospital

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Cellulitis is a common cause for emergency department (ED) presentation and subsequent hospital admission. Underlying fracture, osteomyelitis, or foreign body is often considered in the clinical evaluation of these patients. Accordingly, plain radiographs (XRs) of the affected extremity are often ordered during the initial work-up. The utility of these imaging studies in the treatment of uncomplicated lower-extremity cellulitis, however, remains unclear. In an effort to treat this common problem more efficiently, we evaluated our imaging practices and results in a cohort of consecutive patients admitted to a large public city hospital for treatment of uncomplicated lower-extremity cellulitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 288 consecutive ED admissions for treatment of uncomplicated cellulitis, of which 214 met the inclusion criteria for this study. Patient demographics, history, vitals, laboratory values, and test results were evaluated with univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. RESULTS: XRs of the affected lower extremity were obtained in 158 patients (73.8%). Positive XR findings were present in 19 patients (12.0%) and positively correlated with a history of acute trauma to the extremity (P < .001) or the presence of a chronic wound (P < .01). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed a history of trauma (P < .001) or the presence of a chronic wound (P < .05) to be independent predictors of positive XR findings with relative risks of 6.24 and 2.98, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of lower-extremity cellulitis has potential to significantly improve clinical efficiency and reduce cost by eliminating unnecessary testing. Based on our results, patients without a recent history of trauma to the affected extremity or the presence of a chronic wound do not appear to warrant XRs. When applied to our cohort, only 48 of 158 patients had a history of trauma or chronic wound. This means that 110 patients unnecessarily had plain films taken as part of their initial work-up. In a largely uninsured inner city patient population such as this cohort, that extra cost falls on the public hospital system.

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training provides a low-stress learning environment where real-life emergencies can be practiced. Simulation can improve surgical education and patient care in crisis situations through a team approach emphasizing interpersonal and communication skills. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the effects of simulation-based training in the context of trauma resuscitation in teams of trainees. METHODS: In a New York State-certified level I trauma center, trauma alerts were assessed by a standardized video review process. Simulation training was provided in various trauma situations followed by a debriefing period. The outcomes measured included the number of healthcare workers involved in the resuscitation, the percentage of healthcare workers in role position, time to intubation, time to intubation from paralysis, time to obtain first imaging study, time to leave trauma bay for computed tomography scan or the operating room, presence of team leader, and presence of spinal stabilization. Thirty cases were video analyzed presimulation and postsimulation training. The two data sets were compared via a 1-sided t test for significance (p < 0.05). Nominal data were analyzed using the Fischer exact test. RESULTS: The data were compared presimulation and postsimulation. The number of healthcare workers involved in the resuscitation decreased from 8.5 to 5.7 postsimulation (p < 0.001). The percentage of people in role positions increased from 57.8% to 83.6% (p = 0.46). The time to intubation from paralysis decreased from 3.9 to 2.8 minutes (p < 0.05). The presence of a definitive team leader increased from 64% to 90% (p < 0.05). The rate of spine stabilization increased from 82% to 100% (p < 0.08). After simulation, training adherence to the advanced trauma life support algorithm improved from 56% to 83%. CONCLUSIONS: High-stress situations simulated in a low-stress environment can improve team interaction and educational competencies. Providing simulation training as a tool for surgical education may enhance patient care

Gastrointestinal tract anastomoses are safe to perform, provided that the surgeon has acquired the knowledge and skill to avoid certain errors and pitfalls. This paper illustrates important mistakes relative to esophageal, gastric, intestinal, and colorectal anastomoses, and includes methods for avoiding these errors