Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

person:rodrie20

Total Results:

307


Discussion: Total Face Reconstruction with Flap Prefabrication and Soft-Tissue Expansion Techniques

Tran, David L; Ceradini, Daniel J; Rodriguez, Eduardo D
PMID: 38546364
ISSN: 1529-4242
CID: 5645112

Meta-Analysis of Validated Quality of Life Outcomes Following Voice Feminization in Transwomen

Hao, Yvonne; Trilles, Jorge; Brydges, Hilliard T.; Boczar, Daniel; Kurian, Keerthi K.; Chaya, Bachar F.; Colon, Ricardo Rodriguez; Parker, Augustus; Kwak, Paul E.; Rodriguez, Eduardo D.
Objectives: For transwomen undergoing voice feminization interventions, fundamental frequency (F0; vocal pitch) is a commonly reported functional outcome measure in the literature. However, F0may not correlate well with improvement in quality of life (QoL). Several validated voice-related QoL instruments have been used to assess QoL improvement in these patients, yet there is no consensus on the most appropriate instrument. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the relationship between change in F0and QoL improvement following voice feminization, and to compare validated QoL instruments commonly used in this population. Data Sources: PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. Review Methods: A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Primary studies of transwomen undergoing voice feminization, reporting validated QoL outcomes were included. Meta-analyses for associations between mean change in QoL score and mean change in F0, as well as variations in mean change in QoL score by QoL instrument, were performed using a multilevel mixed effects model. Results: No statistically significant correlation was found between change in F0and QoL score improvement post-intervention. Different validated instruments showed statistically significant variation in QoL score change, with the Trans Women Voice Questionnaire (TWVQ) capturing a greater improvement in QoL score relative to other instruments. Conclusions: Lack of correlation between changes in F0and QoL improvement further supports that F0alone is insufficient to assess the efficacy of voice feminizing interventions. Validated QoL measures are useful adjuncts. Of these, the TWVQ appears to be the most sensitive for measurement of QoL improvement following voice feminization.
SCOPUS:85181071065
ISSN: 1049-2275
CID: 5630392

First-in-Human Whole-Eye Transplantation: Ensuring an Ethical Approach to Surgical Innovation

Laspro, Matteo; Thys, Erika; Chaya, Bachar; Rodriguez, Eduardo D.; Kimberly, Laura L.
As innovations in the field of vascular composite allotransplantation (VCA) progress, whole-eye transplantation (WET) is poised to transition from non-human mammalian models to living human recipients. Present treatment options for vision loss are generally considered suboptimal, and attendant concerns ranging from aesthetics and prosthesis maintenance to social stigma may be mitigated by WET. Potential benefits to WET recipients may also include partial vision restoration, psychosocial benefits related to identity and social integration, improvements in physical comfort and function, and reduced surgical risk associated with a biologic eye compared to a prosthesis. Perioperative and postoperative risks of WET are expected to be comparable to those of facial transplantation (FT), and may be similarly mitigated by immunosuppressive protocols, adequate psychosocial support, and a thorough selection process for both the recipient and donor. To minimize the risks associated with immunosuppressive medications, the first attempts in human recipients will likely be performed in conjunction with a FT. If first-in-human attempts at combined FT-WET prove successful and the biologic eye survives, this opens the door for further advancement in the field of vision restoration by means of a viable surgical option. This analysis integrates recent innovations in WET research with the existing discourse on the ethics of surgical innovation and offers preliminary guidance to VCA programs considering undertaking WET in human recipients.
SCOPUS:85181686181
ISSN: 1526-5161
CID: 5630132

Facial Masculinization Surgery: An Analysis of Interest Trends Using Search Term Analysis

Hoffman, Alexandra F; Laspro, Matteo; Verzella, Alexandra N; Tran, David L; Rodriguez, Eduardo D
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Facial masculinization surgery (FMS) is increasingly popular among cisgender and transgender men. The benefits of FMS are focused on facial identity and have been proven to decrease gender dysphoria in this population. Previous research showed increasing interest in gender affirmation surgery and facial feminization surgery, but the prevalence of FMS has not been explored. It is difficult to find these data based on surgical records alone because institutions do not have standardized methods of reporting and lack publications in the field. Our study aimed to analyze public interest in FMS by using worldwide Google Trends to quantify these trends. METHODS:A worldwide Google Trends search was completed from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2022, for terms focused on FMS. Then, search terms were analyzed for nonfacial masculinization procedures and were aggregated. Lastly, a PubMed search was conducted for the terms "transgender" and "facial masculinization" from January 1, 2008, to December 31 st , 2022, to compare publication rates. RESULTS:Our data showed an increasing interest in FMS through Google search trends since the year 2008. A similar trend was demonstrated for non-FMS gender-affirming terms. PubMed analysis showed "transgender" medicine publishing rates were approximately 39.65 times greater than "facial masculinization" publishing rates, although "facial masculinization" medicine did produce a positive trend over the study period of approximately 4 publications per year. The medical literature on transgender surgeries rapidly outpaces publications specifically focusing on FMS. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our study showed increasing interest in gender affirmation surgery over time, particularly FMS. These increasing trends should encourage greater scientific exploration of FMS and research to properly quantify and assess surgical outcomes in this special population. Additional educational interventions for both the general public and medical providers, to increase awareness of unique challenges that impact this community and highlight changes in health care coverage over time, should be created to keep pace with increasing patient demand and address the physical, systemic, and psychosocial issues faced by people who identify as transgender.
PMID: 37856242
ISSN: 1536-3708
CID: 5612942

Incorporating Trauma-informed Approaches to Care in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Thys, Erika; Laspro, Matteo; Chaya, Bachar F; Rodriguez, Eduardo D; Kimberly, Laura L
Since 1998, vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has been a growing area of research in the field of reconstructive surgery. Although conditions treated with VCA often result from a traumatic injury, there has been limited emphasis on incorporating trauma-informed care (TIC) models in VCA. Considering the importance of psychosocial well-being in VCA candidates and recipients, applying best practices in TIC to the face, upper extremity, and penile transplantation may be critical in minimizing retraumatization throughout the perioperative process. There are six main principles of TIC: safety; trustworthiness and transparency; peer support; collaboration and mutuality; empowerment and choice; and cultural, historical, and gender issues, which may be further incorporated in care for VCA patients. Evaluating for PTSD and incorporating TIC may have substantial benefit to postoperative outcomes.
PMCID:10807881
PMID: 38268713
ISSN: 2169-7574
CID: 5625102

Meta-Analysis of Validated Quality of Life Outcomes Following Voice Feminization in Transwomen

Hao, Yvonne; Trilles, Jorge; Brydges, Hilliard T; Boczar, Daniel; Kurian, Keerthi K; Chaya, Bachar F; Colon, Ricardo Rodriguez; Parker, Augustus; Kwak, Paul E; Rodriguez, Eduardo D
OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:For transwomen undergoing voice feminization interventions, fundamental frequency (F 0 ; vocal pitch) is a commonly reported functional outcome measure in the literature. However, F 0 may not correlate well with improvement in quality of life (QoL). Several validated voice-related QoL instruments have been used to assess QoL improvement in these patients, yet there is no consensus on the most appropriate instrument. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the relationship between change in F 0 and QoL improvement following voice feminization, and to compare validated QoL instruments commonly used in this population. DATA SOURCES/METHODS:PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase. REVIEW METHODS/METHODS:A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Primary studies of transwomen undergoing voice feminization, reporting validated QoL outcomes were included. Meta-analyses for associations between mean change in QoL score and mean change in F 0 , as well as variations in mean change in QoL score by QoL instrument, were performed using a multilevel mixed effects model. RESULTS:No statistically significant correlation was found between change in F 0 and QoL score improvement post-intervention. Different validated instruments showed statistically significant variation in QoL score change, with the Trans Women Voice Questionnaire (TWVQ) capturing a greater improvement in QoL score relative to other instruments. CONCLUSIONS:Lack of correlation between changes in F 0 and QoL improvement further supports that F 0 alone is insufficient to assess the efficacy of voice feminizing interventions. Validated QoL measures are useful adjuncts. Of these, the TWVQ appears to be the most sensitive for measurement of QoL improvement following voice feminization.
PMID: 37702532
ISSN: 1536-3732
CID: 5593522

Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation of the Hand: A Systematic Review of Eligibility Criteria

Laspro, Matteo; Onuh, Ogechukwu C; Carrion, Kassandra; Brydges, Hilliard T; Tran, David L; Chaya, Bachar F; Parker, Augustus; Thanik, Vishal D; Sharma, Sheel; Rodriguez, Eduardo D
BACKGROUND:Hand transplantation (HT) has emerged as an intervention of last resort for those who endured amputation or irreparable loss of upper extremity function. However, because of the considerable effort required for allograft management and the risks of lifelong immunosuppression, patient eligibility is critical to treatment success. Thus, the objective of this article is to investigate the reported eligibility criteria of HT centers globally. METHODS:A systematic review of the HT literature was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines, using PubMed, Cochrane, Ovid/Medline, and Scopus. Program Web sites and clinicaltrials.gov entries were included where available. RESULTS:A total of 354 articles were reviewed, 101 of which met inclusion criteria. Furthermore, 10 patient-facing Web sites and 11 clinical trials were included. The most reported criteria related to the capacity to manage the allograft posttransplantation, including access to follow-up, insurance coverage, psychological stability, and history of medical compliance. Other factors related to the impact of immunosuppression, such as active pregnancy and patient immune status, were less emphasized. CONCLUSIONS:Because of the novelty of the field, eligibility criteria continue to evolve. While there is consensus on certain eligibility factors, other criteria diverge between programs, and very few factors were considered absolute contraindications. As the popularity of the field continues to grow, we encourage the development of consensus evidence-based eligibility criteria.
PMID: 37553908
ISSN: 1536-3708
CID: 5613392

Gender-affirming hysterectomy in the United States: A comparative outcomes analysis and potential implications for uterine transplantation

Siringo, Nicolette V; Boczar, Daniel; Berman, Zoe P; Chaya, Bachar F; Kimberly, Laura; Rodriguez Colon, Ricardo; Trilles, Jorge; Brydges, Hilliard; Rodriguez, Eduardo D
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Hysterectomy is a gynecological procedure sometimes performed as part of the gender-affirming process for transgender and gender-expansive patients assigned female at birth. Our goal was to compare surgical outcomes between patients undergoing gender-affirming hysterectomy and patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign menstrual disorders. We then explored the implications of gender-affirming hysterectomy for uterine transplantation. METHODS:We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2009 through 2018. We identified patients undergoing hysterectomy in the United States based on Current Procedural Terminology code. We used the International Classification of Diseases 9 or 10 codes to identify patients with benign menstrual disorders (non-gender-affirming group) and gender dysphoria (gender-affirming group). We compared patient characteristics and surgical complications. RESULTS:Of the 40,742 patients that met inclusion criteria, 526 (1.3%) patients were individuals with gender dysphoria. Compared to patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign menstrual disorders, gender-affirming patients were younger, were healthier, had a lower prevalence of diabetes, and were more likely to undergo surgery in the outpatient setting, with shorter time to discharge. Complication rates were similar between groups. Logistic regression controlling for the American Society of Anesthesiology classification determined the difference of return to the operating room was not statistically significant (OR 1.082; 95% CI, 0.56-2.10; p = 0.816). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Gender-affirming hysterectomy has a safety profile similar to hysterectomy performed for benign menstrual disorders. Researchers should further explore the possibility of uterus donation among these patients as they may be suitable candidates.
PMID: 37923702
ISSN: 1931-2393
CID: 5607692

Minimally and Non-invasive Approaches to Rejection Identification in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Stead, Thor S; Brydges, Hilliard T; Laspro, Matteo; Onuh, Ogechukwu C; Chaya, Bachar F; Rabbani, Piul S; Lu, Catherine P; Ceradini, Daniel J; Gelb, Bruce E; Rodriguez, Eduardo D
OBJECTIVE:Rejection is common and pernicious following Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA). Current monitoring and diagnostic modalities include the clinical exam which is subjective and biopsy with dermatohistopathologic Banff grading, which is subjective and invasive. We reviewed literature exploring non- and minimally invasive modalities for diagnosing and monitoring rejection (NIMMs) in VCA. METHODS:PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were queried, 3125 unique articles were reviewed, yielding 26 included studies exploring 17 distinct NIMMs. Broadly, NIMMs involved Imaging, Liquid Biomarkers, Epidermal Sampling, Clinical Grading Scales, and Introduction of Additional Donor Tissue. RESULTS:Serum biomarkers including MMP3 and donor-derived microparticles rose with rejection onset. Epidermal sampling non-invasively enabled measurement of cytokine & gene expression profiles implicated in rejection. Both hold promise for monitoring. Clinical grading scales were useful diagnostically as was reflection confocal microscopy. Introducing additional donor tissue showed promise for preemptively identifying rejection but requires additional allograft tissue burden for the recipient. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:NIMMs have the potential to dramatically improve monitoring and diagnosis in VCA. Many modalities show promise however, additional research is needed and a multimodal algorithmic approach should be explored.
PMID: 37625211
ISSN: 1557-9816
CID: 5599092

Combined Face and Whole Eye Transplantation: Cadaveric Rehearsals and Feasibility Assessment

Brydges, Hilliard T.; Onuh, Ogechukwu C.; Chaya, Bachar F.; Tran, David L.; Cassidy, Michael F.; Dedania, Vaidehi S.; Ceradini, Daniel J.; Rodriguez, Eduardo D.
Background: In properly selected patients, combined face and whole eye transplantation (FWET) may offer a more optimal aesthetic and potentially functional outcome while avoiding the complications and stigma of enucleation and prosthetics. This study presents the most comprehensive cadaveric assessment for FWET to date, including rehearsal allograft procurement on a brain-dead donor. Methods: Over a 2-year period, 15 rehearsal dissections were performed on 21 cadavers and one brain-dead donor. After identification of a potential recipient, rehearsals assessed clinical feasibility and enabled operative planning, technical practice, refinement of personalized equipment, and improved communication among team members. Operative techniques are described. Results: Facial allograft procurement closely followed previously described face transplant techniques. Ophthalmic to superficial temporal (O-ST) vessel anastomosis for globe survival was assessed. Craniectomy allowed for maximal optic nerve and ophthalmic vessel pedicle length. Appropriate pedicle length and vessel caliber for O-ST anastomosis was seen. Research procurement demonstrated collateral blood flow to the orbit and surrounding structures from the external carotid system as well as confirmed the feasibility of timely O-ST anastomosis. Personalized cutting guides enabled highly accurate bony inset. Conclusions: This study formalizes an approach to FWET, which is feasible for clinical translation in judiciously selected patients. O-ST anastomosis seems to minimize retinal ischemia time and allow perfusion of the combined allograft on a single external carotid pedicle. Although restoration of vision likely remains out of reach, globe survival is possible.
SCOPUS:85178043696
ISSN: 2169-7574
CID: 5621122