Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE:Urge urinary incontinence is the involuntary leakage of urine associated with a sudden compelling urge to void. A previous study found an association between urge urinary incontinence and household income, indicating that social determinants of health may influence urge urinary incontinence. Food insecurity is a relevant social determinant of health, as a diet with bladder irritants may worsen urge urinary incontinence symptoms. This study aimed to investigate the association between urge urinary incontinence and food insecurity. MATERIALS AND METHODS:We collected data from the 2005-2010 cycles of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a nationally representative health survey administered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The association between urge urinary incontinence and food insecurity was analyzed using survey-weighed logistic regression with adjustments for demographic, socioeconomic status, behavioral, and medical comorbidities covariates. RESULTS:< .001). When comparing diets, food-insecure participants reported significantly less intake of bladder irritants (caffeine and alcohol) compared to food-secure participants. When the sample was stratified by food insecurity status (yes vs no), consumption of caffeine did not differ by urge urinary incontinence status and consumption of alcohol was lower among participants with vs without urge urinary incontinence. CONCLUSIONS:Adults reporting food insecurity in the past year are significantly more likely to experience urge urinary incontinence than those who did not. Consumption of bladder irritants including caffeine and alcohol was significantly less in food-insecure compared to food-secure participants. When the sample was stratified by food insecurity status (yes vs no), consumption of caffeine did not differ by urge urinary incontinence status and consumption of alcohol was lower among participants with vs without urge urinary incontinence. These data indicate that diet alone does not drive the association between urge urinary incontinence and food insecurity. Instead, food insecurity may be a proxy for social inequity, perhaps the greatest driver of disease.

AIMS:Refractory overactive bladder (OAB) is among the most common reasons for referral to specialists in voiding dysfunction. Significant racial and ethnic disparities exist in prevalence, severity, and management of OAB, presenting care barriers for marginalized patients. We aim to explicate these disparities and explore the factors that led to their existence and persistence. We will additionally offer suggestions to mitigate such disparities and approach equitable care for our patients. METHODS:This is a narrative review of pertinent articles related to health disparities in OAB. Articles on OAB prevalence stratified by race and ethnicity, and variations in treatment patterns for patients of marginalized backgrounds were identified from the PubMed database. We also included a review of evidence from governmental and historical sources to provide sociocultural context. RESULTS:Patients from marginalized backgrounds are underrepresented in OAB literature. There appear to be differences in symptom severity and prevalence based on race. OAB severity seems closely entwined with social determinants of health. Patients from marginalized populations experience numerous care barriers impeding the treatment of OAB. Finally, White patients are more likely to receive advanced management for OAB. CONCLUSIONS:Numerous health disparities exist in the diagnosis and management of OAB. This review is grounded in societal context: health injustice in the United States ultimately stems from systemic racism. Improving our understanding of care disparities and the systems that allow them to persist will bring us closer to equity and allow our patients from marginalized backgrounds to obtain the evidence-based care they deserve.

OBJECTIVES:The aim of the study was to describe time intervals between pessary maintenance visits in racially diverse women receiving care in a U.S. epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic. We secondarily aimed to determine whether time interval between pessary changes is associated with adverse outcomes and to identify factors associated with adverse pessary outcomes. METHODS:We performed a retrospective study of women undergoing pessary care after the COVID-19 pandemic began. Time between the most recent visit before the pandemic and first visit after the pandemic began was recorded. Pessary care data were collected from the latter visit, including vaginal bleeding, vaginal discharge, and erosion. Patient-reported symptoms and demographics were also recorded. The relationship between time interval between pessary visits and adverse outcomes as well as between adverse outcomes and demographic data was assessed. RESULTS:We identified 104 women undergoing pessary care, of which 35.6% were Hispanic and 32.7% were Black and 26.2% ± 10.5% lived in poverty. The median time to in-person visit was 4.5 months (interquartile range, 3.7-5.3 months). Seven women (8.7%) had vaginal bleeding, 15 (14.6%) had vaginal discharge, and 7 (6.8%) had erosions. There was no significant association between time interval between pessary visits and adverse outcomes or between adverse outcomes and patient characteristics (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Longer duration of time between pessary maintenance visits is not associated with increased adverse outcomes in this group of racially diverse women. Extended intervals between pessary visits can be considered to minimize risk and maintain patient safety during challenging circumstances, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective/UNASSIGNED:To compare perioperative outcomes of the elderly versus non-elderly patients on ERPs undergoing laparotomy for gynecologic surgery. Methods/UNASSIGNED:-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables, with p < 0.05 for significance. Results/UNASSIGNED:One hundred eighty-nine patients were enrolled in the study, including 16 patients ≥ 70 years old. The median age was 75 years for the elderly and 45 years for the non-elderly. Elderly patients were more likely to have more complex surgery and longer operative times (absolute median difference of 39 min). Despite the increasing complexity of surgical procedures for elderly patients, there were no statistically significant differences in serious inpatient complications (Clavien-Dindo score 3A or greater), pain and nausea scores, 30-day complications and readmission rates. Elderly patients had a longer median length of stay compared to non-elderly patients by one day (p < 0.001), however, this was not statistically significant on multivariate analysis. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:In our series, elderly patients on the ERP had similar rates of complications and readmission when compared to non-elderly patients, despite undergoing more complex surgeries. This suggests that ERP may be feasible and safe in the elderly population undergoing elective gynecologic laparotomy.

There is a current paucity of information about the obstetric and perinatal outcomes of pregnant novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients in North America. Data from China suggest that pregnant women with COVID-19 have favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes, with rare cases of critical illness or respiratory compromise. However, we report two cases of pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 in the late preterm period admitted to tertiary care hospitals in New York City for respiratory indications. After presenting with mild symptoms, both quickly developed worsening respiratory distress requiring intubation, and both delivered preterm via caesarean delivery. These cases highlight the potential for rapid respiratory decompensation in pregnant COVID-19 patients and the maternal-fetal considerations in managing these cases.