Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Three tests (active compression, anterior slide, and compression rotation) are commonly used to diagnose superior labral anterior-posterior lesions. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVE:We hypothesized that the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for these tests was less than that previously reported and that a click in the shoulder during manipulation was not specific for the study lesion. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Case-control study. METHODS:The three tests were performed on 426 patients who subsequently underwent shoulder arthroscopy. The results of physical examination were compared with the arthroscopic findings and analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS:At arthroscopy, 39 patients had type II to IV lesions (study group); the remaining 387 patients had type I lesion or no lesion (control group). The incidences of positive results were not statistically different between the groups (P > 0.05). Our findings were as follows: most sensitive test, active compression (47%); most specific test, anterior slide (84%); highest positive predictive value, active compression (10%); highest overall accuracy, anterior slide test (77%); lowest overall accuracy, active compression test (54%). The presence of a click and the location of the pain were not reliable diagnostic indicators. CONCLUSIONS:The results of such tests should be interpreted with caution when considering surgery for a possible superior labral anterior-posterior lesion.

During the last 3 decades, arthroscopy has revolutionized the way knee surgery is performed. The indications and the applications of arthroscopic procedures in the knee joint have enormously increased with the improvement in surgical technique and advent of new arthroscopic equipment. The use of arthroscopic techniques has led to a significant decrease in morbidity for the patient with intraarticular abnormalities, in terms of both diagnosis and surgical correction. Even though knee arthroscopy is a minimally invasive procedure with relatively low morbidity, it is not without risk of complications, of which neurovascular complications are among the most serious and devastating. The reported incidence of neurovascular complication is low, but it may be underestimated. Many neurovascular complications that occur are preventable with a thorough understanding of neurovascular anatomy, good preoperative and intraoperative planning, and attention to the details of basic techniques and the equipment used for the procedure. It is imperative that the surgeon who is performing arthroscopy be aware of these neurovascular complications, recognize them as early as possible, and initiate further evaluation and treatment as expeditiously as possible. In this article, the causes, management, prevention, and medicolegal implications of neurovascular complications of knee arthroscopy are reviewed.