Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: A two-period, crossover study was undertaken comparing next-generation gray photochromic Transitions Lenses (Transitions Optical, Inc., Pinellas Park, FL) with clear lenses and a study purple-colored photochromic lens to evaluate enhancement to vision-related quality of life (VRQOL). METHODS: Fifty-two patients were randomized into one of four lens crossover groups: gray-->clear; clear-->gray; gray-->purple; and purple-->gray. Each lens was worn for 30 days. VRQOL was measured using a previously administered questionnaire, the Transitions Vision Related Quality of Life' (TVRQOL) survey instrument (see Appendix to this article). Differences in responses related to each lens worn in the comparison were recorded. RESULTS: Overall, next-generation gray Transitions Lenses were associated with the greatest improvement in VRQOL compared to clear or purple lenses. The gray lens proved statistically superior to the clear lens, across four of the five subscales. When given the choice of which lens they would like to continue to wear, 85% (23 of 27) of the patients preferred the gray lens. No statistically significant difference was observed between the gray lens and the study purple lens. CONCLUSIONS: Next-generation gray Transitions Lenses offer patients significant and clinically meaningful improvements in VRQOL, and are superior to clear lenses. A patient's overall visual experience is best served by proper product selection to provide optimal visual acuity and VRQOL performance

PURPOSE: Overall, contact lenses provide a safe and effective modality for vision correction. However, problems do occasionally arise. Up to 80% of contact lens complications can be traced to poor patient compliance with recommended lens care guidelines. We conducted a survey to evaluate the level of patient compliance in specific areas of lens care and maintenance and to assess patient knowledge of basic contact lens information. METHODS: Patients were asked to complete an anonymous 15 question survey that focused on lens care--specifically the use of contact lens cleaners, methods of disinfection, enzyme treatments, use of rewetting drops, and the frequency of follow-up exams. In addition, the survey included six true/false questions relating to contact lens care and safety. RESULTS: There were a total of 103 participants in the study. Approximately 24% of patients stated they never cleaned their lenses prior to disinfection, and 5% used saline solutions as their primary mode of disinfection. A sizable portion of those surveyed (43% of soft lens wearers and 71% of rigid gas permeable lens wearers) either never used enzyme cleaners or used them less than once a month. Seventy percent of patients either never used rewetting drops or used them less than once a day. Twenty-nine percent of patients consulted their eye care professionals every 2 years and 6% less often than every two years. Six questions assessed patient knowledge of contact lens care safety. Of a possible six out of six correct answers, the mean number of correct responses was 3.74. CONCLUSIONS: A sizable proportion of contact lens wearers do not adequately adhere to recommended contact lens care, and many have an inadequate understanding of contact lens care guidelines. Therefore, it is important that practitioners place more emphasis on patient education at the time of initial contact lens fitting and reinforce such instruction during follow-up visits