Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:The authors sought to identify factors associated with current chiefs and chairpersons in academic plastic surgery to encourage and shape future leaders of tomorrow. METHODS:Academic chairpersons in plastic surgery (n = 94) were identified through an Internet-based search of all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited residency training programs during the year 2015. Sex, ethnicity, academic rank, board certification, time since certification, medical school attended, residency program attended, fellowships training, advanced degrees, obtaining leadership roles at trainee's institution, and h-index were analyzed. RESULTS:Of the 94 chiefs and chairpersons, 96 percent were male and 81 percent obtained full professor status, and 98 percent were certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery. Mean time since certification was 22 years (range, 7 to 45 years). Fifty-one percent graduated from 20 medical schools, whereas 42 percent graduated from only nine plastic surgery training programs. Fifty-six percent had pursued fellowship beyond their primary plastic surgery training. Eighteen percent had obtained advanced degrees. Twenty-nine percent of chiefs and chairpersons obtained leadership roles at the institution where they had completed plastic surgery training. The mean h-index was 17.6 (range, 1 to 63). Graduates of the nine most represented residency programs had a mean h-index of 21 versus 15 when compared with the remaining chief/chairpersons (p < 0.0062). CONCLUSION:Leaders in plastic surgery are more likely to be male, hold academic rank of professor, and have completed a fellowship after residency.

BACKGROUND:Hand and upper extremity injuries are one of the leading causes of injury in the United States, making up 10% of all emergency department visits. The purpose of this study was to determine if there are any demographic differences between patients presenting primarily to our emergency department for upper extremity injuries versus those transferred from outside hospitals for the same diagnoses. METHODS:A retrospective review of our hand trauma database was performed between 2011 and 2014. All patients within this period with International Classification of Disease 9 codes consistent with upper extremity injuries were included in this study. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: those who first presented to another hospital and accepted as transfers to our institution (group 1) and those presenting directly to our emergency department (group 2). Demographic data were collected for each group including sex, age, race, insurance status, mechanism, need for emergent surgery, and day and time of presentation. The groups were analyzed using odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval and paired t test for continuous variables. RESULTS:One hundred thirty-nine patients with isolated upper extremity injuries were accepted for transfer from an outside hospital, and 419 patients presented directly to our institution. The average age of group 1 was 38 (77% M, 23% F) compared with 41 (73% M, 27% F) for group 2. Forty percent of group 1 patients were uninsured compared with 17% for group 2. There was a significant difference between groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:The data suggest that our institution receives a large proportion of uninsured patients transferred for emergent upper extremity care compared with our current patient demographic. Because this is a retrospective study, the precise reason for these discrepancies will remain unknown.

BACKGROUND:Previous data suggest significant ethnic differences in outcomes following percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCI), though previous studies have focused on subgroups of PCI patients or used administrative data only. We sought to compare outcomes in a population-based cohort of men and women of South Asian (SA), Chinese and "Other" ethnicity. METHODS:Using a population-based registry, we identified 41,792 patients who underwent first revascularization via PCI in British Columbia, Canada, between 2001 and 2010. We defined three ethnic groups (SA, 3904 [9.3%]; Chinese, 1345 [3.2%]; and all "Others" 36,543 [87.4%]). Differences in mortality, repeat revascularization (RRV) and target vessel revascularization (TVR), at 30 days and from 31 days to 2 years were examined. RESULTS:Adjusted mortality from 31 days to 2 years was lower in Chinese patients than in "Others" (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.97), but not different between SAs and "Others". SA patients had higher RRV at 30 days (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.30; 95% CI: 1.12-1.51) and from 31 days to 2 years (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.17; 95% CI: 1.06-1.30) compared to "Others". In contrast, Chinese patients had a lower rate of RRV from 31 days to 2 years (adjusted HR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.64-0.96) versus "Others". SA patients also had higher rates of TVR at 30 days (adjusted OR 1.35; 95% CI: 1.10-1.66) and from 31 days to 2 years (adjusted HR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.06-1.34) compared to "Others". Chinese patients had a lower rate of TVR from 31 days to 2 years (adjusted HR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.60-0.96). CONCLUSIONS:SA had higher RRV and TVR rates while Chinese Canadians had lower rates of long-term RRV, compared to those of "Other" ethnicity. Further research to elucidate the reasons for these differences could inform targeted strategies to improve outcomes.