Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Plastic surgery education consists of technical skills, surgical decision-making, and the knowledge necessary to provide safe patient care. Competency in these modalities is ensured by requiring case minimums and oral and written examinations. However, there is a paucity of information detailing what teaching modalities residency programs use outside of the operating room. METHODS:A 16-question survey was sent to all integrated and independent program directors. Information regarding nonsurgical resident education was collected and analyzed. RESULTS:There were 44 responses (46 percent). Most programs had six to 10 faculty (43 percent), and a majority (85 percent) required faculty to participate in resident education outside of the operating room. Residents most commonly had 3 to 4 hours (43 percent) of protected educational time 1 day per week (53 percent). Nonsurgical education consisted of weekly lectures by attending physicians (44 percent) and residents (54 percent), in addition to weekly CoreQuest (48 percent), teaching rounds (38 percent), and Plastic Surgery Education Network lectures (55 percent). Monthly activities included morbidity and mortality conference (81 percent) and journal club (86 percent). Indications conference was either monthly (41 percent) or weekly (39 percent). Cadaver laboratories, visiting professors, board preparation, in-service review, and meetings with the program director occurred yearly or several times per year. Forty-nine percent of programs sponsor one educational course per resident. In addition, most programs (65 percent) do not receive outside funding for education. CONCLUSIONS:These findings improve understanding of the current state of nonsurgical resident education in plastic surgery. They illustrate that residents participate in a diverse number of nonsurgical educational activities without any significant standardization.

BACKGROUND:The gender disparity between the number of female and male chairs and program directors has been previously established. The aim of this study was to determine whether any differences in objective credentials existed between male and female plastic surgery department chairs/division chiefs and program directors. METHODS:Information about each plastic surgery program director and chair/chief was extracted from the websites of all institutions affiliated with a plastic surgery residency program. For each individual, information about the length of their career, number of fellowships completed, and number of publications was recorded. The two-tailed t test was used to compare differences between male and female chairs and program directors. RESULTS:A total of 99 chairs were recorded, of which nine (9.1 percent) were female. Of the 99 program directors, 13 (13.1 percent) were female. There was no difference in the number of years in practice or number of fellowships between men and women for either position. On average, male chairs had significantly fewer publications than female chairs (71.9 versus 128; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of publications between male and female program directors. Compared to program directors, chairs had significantly more years in practice and numbers of publications, which held true for both men and women. CONCLUSIONS:Women are not only underrepresented in the department chair and program director positions, but also possess higher qualifications that may reflect differences in standards for promotion and appointment. Additional research is needed to elucidate the reasons behind the observed differences in qualifications.

BACKGROUND:Women now constitute 40.5 percent of integrated plastic surgery residents; however, in 2007, women represented only 11.3 percent of the leadership positions in plastic surgery societies and journal editorial boards. The authors analyzed female representation in these societies and editorial boards over the past 10 years. METHODS:Names of board members from the major plastic surgery societies (American Society of Plastic Surgeons, The Plastic Surgery Foundation, and American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, among others) for the past 10 years and the major plastic journals (Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery, and so on) from the past 5 years were extracted from their websites. The yearly percentage of female plastic surgery residents was obtained from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education published data. The proportions of women in society leadership, editorial boards, and residency were compared with data analyses of time series trend and linear and Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average time series modeling. RESULTS:Over the past 10 years, the percentage of female residents has grown steadily, from 21.84 percent to 37.31 percent. Similarly, female representation in society leadership has grown from 6.78 percent to 20.29 percent. Both growth coefficients were statistically significant and showed no statistical difference between the two. In contrast, editorial board leadership over the past 5 years showed statistically insignificant growth and showed a statistically significant difference when compared to the growth of the percentage of female residents and female representation in society leadership. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Female representation in plastic surgery society leadership shows promising growth, whereas their representation on editorial boards showed significantly less growth, which may reflect the slower turnover on these boards.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Recurrent platysma bands remain a common problem in neck rejuvenation. Objectives/UNASSIGNED:The goals of this cadaver study were to document the course of the cervical branches of the facial nerve and investigate the pattern of platysma muscle innervation before and after various platysmaplasty maneuvers. Methods/UNASSIGNED:A total of 8 fresh cadaver specimens were dissected for a total of 16 hemifaces/necks. After subcutaneous undermining and identification of the main trunk of the facial nerve, the cervical branch was dissected as distally/anteriorly as possible under loupe magnification. The following 4 platysmaplasty maneuvers were each performed on 4 hemifaces/necks: platysma window, extended SMAS with platysma flap, full width platysma transection, and lateral skin-platysma displacement (LSD). Upon completion of the techniques, the integrity of the cervical branches was evaluated. Results/UNASSIGNED:Contrary to some reports, all specimens in this study had only 1 main cervical branch. There were no branches detectable under 3.2× magnification until branches were given off to the platysma muscle at approximately the location of the facial vessels. The main cervical branch continued distally/anteriorly to the medial edge of the muscle below the thyroid cartilage. After performing the various platysma techniques, all cervical branches were in continuity in all specimens. Specifically, the main cervical branch was in continuity to the medial border of the muscle caudal to all platysmaplasty maneuvers. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:Undermining the platysma muscle results in no injury to platysmal innervation unless continued beyond the facial vessels. Recurrent bands are likely related to persistent innervation of the medial platysma, which remains intact cranial and caudal to any described platysmal transection maneuvers.

BACKGROUND:The authors assess the impact of rhinoplasty on public perception of a patient's appearance and personality. METHODS:A survey was created using standardized before-and-after photographs of 10 Caucasian women who had undergone primary rhinoplasty. Photographs of two additional women who had not undergone facial surgery were randomly included as controls, for a total of 12 survey items. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were placed side by side. The survey was administered by means of crowd-sourcing. Respondents were asked to evaluate which photograph better represented 11 traits of appearance or personality, according to a seven-point Likert scale. A score of 1 meant the preoperative photograph was much better, 7 meant the postoperative photograph was much better, and 4 meant no difference. T tests and analyses of variance were used to evaluate rating changes for each trait and differences between demographic groups. RESULTS:There were 264 responses received. Averaged scores across the 10 survey patients produced a value for each appearance or personality trait. In 10 of 11 categories (i.e., symmetry, youthfulness, facial harmony, likeability, trustworthiness, confidence, femininity, attractiveness, approachability, and intelligence), the postoperative photograph was significantly favorable compared with the preoperative photograph (p < 0.00001). The preoperative photograph was rated higher only in aggressiveness (p < 0.001). The same scores were calculated for the controls; no significant difference in any category was seen except confidence, where the right image was viewed as more confident (mean, 4.19; p < 0.005). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Aesthetic rhinoplasty improves the public perception of a person's appearance and personality in multiple aspects.

BACKGROUND:Patient satisfaction surveys are an increasingly important part of health care, influencing the practice of physicians. Press Ganey has developed tools to assess physician and department performance that are used by 50 percent of hospitals in the United States and over 10,000 health care organizations. The authors sought to evaluate the factors that influence patient satisfaction in plastic surgery patients both locally and nationally. METHODS:A 24-item Press Ganey survey was distributed to patients of 686 participating plastic surgeons nationwide, including those at the authors' home institution. The responses from January to December of 2016 were analyzed retrospectively with Pearson correlation coefficients. The items "likelihood to recommend provider" and "likelihood to recommend practice" were correlated to all other items of the survey, as these items have been shown to be surrogates for overall satisfaction. RESULTS:There were 411 survey responses from patients in the Northwell Health System and 36,836 responses from patients nationally. Items that were not well correlated (r < 0.5) with "likelihood to recommend practice" or "provider" were items such as wait time and courtesy of registration staff. The items that were best correlated (r > 0.8) with "likelihood to recommend practice" or "provider" were the patient's confidence in the care provider and the provider's concern for questions. All correlations were statistically significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In an evolving patient centric culture, the patient's confidence and trust of the provider is more important than perception of the provider's office environment to maintaining patient loyalty and market share.

BACKGROUND:Recent health care changes have encouraged efforts to decrease costs. In plastic surgery, an area of potential cost savings includes appropriate use of pathologic examination. Specimens are frequently sent because of hospital policy, insurance request, or habit, even when clinically unnecessary. This is an area where evidence-based guidelines are lacking and significant cost-savings can be achieved. METHODS:All specimen submitted for pathologic examination at two hospitals between January and December of 2015 were queried for tissue expanders, breast implants, fat, skin, abdominal pannus, implant capsule, hardware, rib, bone, cartilage, scar, and keloid. Specimens not related to plastic surgery procedures were excluded. Pathologic diagnosis and cost data were obtained. RESULTS:A total of 759 specimens were identified. Of these, 161 were sent with a specific request for gross examination only. There were no clinically significant findings in any of the specimens. There was one incidental finding of a seborrheic keratosis on breast skin. The total amount billed in 2015 was $430,095. CONCLUSIONS:The infrequency of clinically significant pathologic examination results does not support routine pathologic examination of all plastic surgery specimens. Instead, the authors justify select submission only when there is clinical suspicion or medical history that warrants evaluation. By eliminating unnecessary histologic or macroscopic examination, significant cost savings may be achieved.

BACKGROUND: Face lifting is one of the most common operative procedures for facial aging and perhaps the procedure most synonymous with plastic surgery in the minds of the lay public, but no verifiable documentation of patient satisfaction exists in the literature. This study is the first to examine face-lift outcomes and patient satisfaction using a validated questionnaire. METHODS: One hundred five patients undergoing a face lift performed by the senior author (C.H.T.) using a high, extended-superficial musculoaponeurotic system with submental platysma approximation technique were asked to complete anonymously the FACE-Q by e-mail. FACE-Q scores were assessed for each domain (range, 0 to 100), with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with appearance or superior quality of life. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients completed the FACE-Q (50.5 percent response rate). Patients demonstrated high satisfaction with facial appearance (mean +/- SD, 80.7 +/- 22.3), and quality of life, including social confidence (90.4 +/- 16.6), psychological well-being (92.8 +/- 14.3), and early life impact (92.2 +/- 16.4). Patients also reported extremely high satisfaction with their decision to undergo face lifting (90.5 +/- 15.9). On average, patients felt they appeared 6.9 years younger than their actual age. Patients were most satisfied with the appearance of their nasolabial folds (86.2 +/- 18.5), cheeks (86.1 +/- 25.4), and lower face/jawline (86.0 +/- 20.6), compared with their necks (78.1 +/- 25.6) and area under the chin (67.9 +/- 32.3). CONCLUSION: Patients who responded in this study were extremely satisfied with their decision to undergo face lifting and the outcomes and quality of life following the procedure.