Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Cannabis is one of the most widely used drugs worldwide. Cannabis use disorder is characterised by recurrent use of cannabis that causes significant clinical and functional impairment. There are no approved pharmacological treatments for cannabis use disorder. One approach is to potentiate endocannabinoid signalling by inhibiting fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), the enzyme that degrades the endocannabinoid anandamide. We aimed to test the efficacy and safety of the FAAH-inhibitor PF-04457845 in reduction of cannabis withdrawal and cannabis use in men who were daily cannabis users. METHODS:We did a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group phase 2a trial at one site in men aged 18-55 years with cannabis dependence according to DSM-IV criteria (equivalent to cannabis use disorder in DSM-5). After baseline assessments, participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive PF-04457845 (4 mg per day) or placebo using a fixed block size of six participants, stratified by severity of cannabis use and desire to quit. Participants were admitted to hospital for 5 days (maximum 8 days) to achieve abstinence and precipitate cannabis withdrawal, after which they were discharged to continue the remaining 3 weeks of treatment as outpatients. The primary endpoints were treatment-related differences in cannabis withdrawal symptoms during hospital admission, and week 4 (end of treatment) self-reported cannabis use and urine THC-COOH concentrations in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01618656. FINDINGS:=0·035) and related mood symptoms during the inpatient phase. Additionally, treatment with PF-04457845 was associated with lower self-reported cannabis use at 4 weeks (mean 1·27 joints per day [95% CI 0·82-1·97] vs 0·40 [0·25-0·62]; difference 0·88 [0·29-1·46]; p=0·0003) and lower urinary THC-COOH concentrations (mean 657·92 ng/mL [95% CI 381·60-1134·30] vs 265·55 [175·60-401·57]; difference 392·37 [17·55-767·18)]; p=0·009). Eight (17%) patients in the PF-04457845 group and four (17%) in the placebo group discontinued during the treatment period. During the 4-week treatment phase, 20 (43%) of 46 participants in the PF-04457845 group and 11 (46%) of 24 participants in the placebo group had an adverse event. There were no serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION:PF-04457845, a novel FAAH inhibitor, reduced cannabis withdrawal symptoms and cannabis use in men, and might represent an effective and safe approach for the treatment of cannabis use disorder. FUNDING:United States National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA).

RATIONALE:Preliminary evidence suggests that cannabidiol (CBD) may be effective in the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders; however, CBD has never been evaluated for the treatment of cognitive impairments associated with schizophrenia (CIAS). OBJECTIVE:This study compared the cognitive, symptomatic, and side effects of CBD versus placebo in a clinical trial. METHODS:This study was a 6-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group, fixed-dose study of oral CBD (600 mg/day) or placebo augmentation in 36 stable antipsychotic-treated patients diagnosed with chronic schizophrenia. All subjects completed the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) at baseline and at end of 6 weeks of treatment. Psychotic symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) at baseline and biweekly. RESULTS:There was no main effect of time or drug on MCCB Composite score, but a significant drug × time effect was observed (p = 0.02). Post hoc analyses revealed that only placebo-treated subjects improved over time (p = 0.03). There was a significant decrease in PANSS Total scores over time (p < 0. 0001) but there was no significant drug × time interaction (p = 0.18). Side effects were similar between CBD and placebo, with the one exception being sedation, which was more prevalent in the CBD group. CONCLUSIONS:At the dose studied, CBD augmentation was not associated with an improvement in MCCB or PANSS scores in stable antipsychotic-treated outpatients with schizophrenia. Overall, CBD was well tolerated with no worsening of mood, suicidality, or movement side effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00588731.

BACKGROUND: Several lines of evidence suggest the presence of abnormalities in the endocannabinoid (eCB) system in schizophrenia (SCZ). However, there are limited in vivo measures of the eCB system in SCZ. METHODS: Twenty five male SCZ subjects (SCZs) (18 antipsychotic treated and 7 antipsychotic free) were compared with 18 age-matched male healthy control subjects (HCs). Subjects underwent one positron emission tomography scan each with the cannabinoid receptor-1 (CB1R) selective radiotracer [11C]OMAR on the high resolution research tomography scanner. Regional volume of distribution (VT) values were determined using kinetic modeling of positron emission tomography data as a measure of CB1R availability. Group differences in mean composite [11C]OMAR VT values were compared between SCZs and HCs. Exploratory comparisons of CB1R availability within 15 brain regions were also conducted. All analyses were covaried for age and body mass index. RESULTS: SCZs showed significantly (p = .02) lower composite [11C]OMAR VT relative to HCs (~12% difference, effect size d = .73). [11C]OMAR VT was significantly (all ps < .05) lower in SCZs in the amygdala, caudate, posterior cingulate cortex, hippocampus, hypothalamus, and insula. Composite [11]OMAR VT was HCs > antipsychotic treated SZCs > antipsychotic free SZCs. Furthermore, composite [11C]OMAR VT was greater in HCs than SCZ smokers (n = 11) and SCZ nonsmokers (n = 14). CONCLUSIONS: CB1R availability is lower in male SCZ subjects compared with HCs. Furthermore, antipsychotics and tobacco use may increase CB1R availability in this population. The findings of the study provide further evidence supporting the hypothesis that alterations in the eCB system might contribute to the pathophysiology of SCZ.

OBJECTIVE:Medication nonadherence is a serious issue in clinical trials, especially in studies of substance abuse disorders. Measuring and confirming adherence is critical to ensuring that collected data is accurate and interpretable. This study evaluated the feasibility and success of a smartphone-based approach (Cellphone Assisted Remote Observation of Medication Adherence [CAROMA]) to visually confirm medication adherence in a clinical trial. METHOD:Medication adherence was confirmed visually via smartphones provided to participants in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial for cannabis dependence. Every morning, subjects (n=20) were video-called by staff who observed consumption of study medication. Adherence was also assessed with weekly face-to-face visits, pill counts and plasma drug levels. Subjects were paid for completing daily CAROMA visits, and for returning the smartphone at study completion. RESULTS:CAROMA confirmed 96.04% adherence to medication. Concordance between expected and actual remaining study medication counted at weekly study visits was 87.69%. Subjects assigned to active study medication had detectable plasma drug levels, while those assigned to placebo did not. CAROMA was estimated to cost approximately $100 per subject per week - a total of $300.24 per subject for the 3-week outpatient portion of the trial. CONCLUSION:This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility, success and cost-effectiveness of CAROMA to facilitate and confirm medication adherence in a clinical trial. Preliminary findings support larger and longer studies, and possibly applying this approach to clinical care - especially in other populations with high rates of medication nonadherence.

BACKGROUND:R availability in cannabis-dependent (CD) subjects after short-term and intermediate-term abstinence has not been determined. METHODS:C]OMAR volume of distribution was measured in male CD subjects (n = 11) and matched healthy control (HC) subjects (n = 19). The CD subjects were scanned at baseline (while they were neither intoxicated nor in withdrawal) and after 2 days and 28 days of monitored abstinence. The HC subjects were scanned at baseline, and a subset (n = 4) was scanned again 28 days later. RESULTS:R availability in CD subjects after 28 days of abstinence. CONCLUSIONS:R downregulation, which begins to reverse rapidly on termination of cannabis use and may continue to increase over time.