Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:There is a lack of consensus on the optimal age for specific surgical interventions for developmental dysplasia of the hip. We compared radiographic and clinical outcomes among patients who were treated with closed reduction (CR), open reduction (OR), and open reduction with concomitant pelvic osteotomy (ORP) for the treatment of a dislocated hip. We sought to identify the optimal age at treatment within each of these groups. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed 256 hips (n=195 patients) who underwent CR (n=96), OR (n=116), or an ORP (n=44) as their index procedure at a single institution between January 1, 2004 and September 23, 2020. Radiographic outcomes included acetabular index, The International Hip Dysplasia Institute classification, and acetabular depth ratio. The incidence of further corrective surgery (FCS), defined as the need for an additional femoral and/or pelvic osteotomy before skeletal maturity, and the optimal age cutoffs for index surgery within each surgical group were determined. RESULTS:After adjusting for age and sex, the incidence of FCS was 13.8% in the CR group, 29.2% in the OR group, and 9.2% in the ORP group. Earlier surgery was protective against FCS in the CR and OR groups. In contrast, patients in the ORP group who were older at index procedure were less likely to undergo FCS. Optimal age at surgery was 9.9 months (CR), 11.5 months (OR), and 21.4 months (ORP). Compared with older patients, younger patients were associated with a larger average decrease in the acetabular index and a larger average increase in acetabular width during the first 5 years post surgery. CONCLUSIONS:Age at index surgical procedure was correlated with both clinical and radiographic outcomes. Age at index procedure did impact the risk of subsequent FCS, particularly in the CR and ORP groups. Based on our analysis, CR should be considered before 9.9 months of age and OR considered before 11.5 months of age to minimize the risk of FCS during childhood. This work highlights the importance of considering age-related heterogeneity in developmental dysplasia of the hip treatment outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Dysplasia epiphysealis hemimelica (DEH), also known as Trevor disease, is a rare pathologic proliferation of cartilage with unknown etiology creating cartilaginous osteochondroma exostoses intra-articularly or juxta-articularly. Herein, we reviewed the literature about acetabular osteochondroma in children and report a case of a 9-year-old boy who presented to the orthopaedic clinic with complaints of gait disturbance, right hip discomfort, and with increasing severity and frequency of hip subluxation episodes over the course of a year. Imaging studies revealed dysplasia of the right hip with subluxation secondary to acetabular lesion. The patient underwent surgical hip dislocation to facilitate surgical excision of the lesion and reduce hip, and pathology confirmed osteochondroma with chondromatosis. We report the early follow-up for this patient and discuss the value of surgical hip dislocation to manage intra-articular bone or cartilage lesions.

BACKGROUND:Supracondylar humerus (SCH) fracture is the most common elbow injury in children and often treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP). There is little published evidence supporting or refuting the use of perioperative prophylactic antibiotics for SCH CRPP in the pediatric population. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rate of surgical site infection for patients with and without preoperative antibiotics. METHODS:A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients less than or equal to 16 years from 2012 to 2018 who underwent primary CRPP. Open fractures, multilimbed polytraumas, and immunodeficient patients were excluded. Infection rates were compared using a noninferiority test assuming a 3% infection rate and a predefined noninferiority margin of 4%. A total of 255 patients were needed to adequately power the study. RESULTS:Of the 1253 cases identified, 845 met eligibility criteria. A total of 337 received antibiotics, and 508 did not. Preoperative nerve injury (P=0.0244) and sterilization technique (P<0.0001) were associated with antibiotic use: 4 patients developed an infection; there were successfully treated superficial infections, and 1 was a deep infection requiring a formal debridement. There were 8 patients that had a recorded mal-union, and 6 patients required additional procedures; 1 patient had a postoperative compartment syndrome on postoperation day 1. The infection rates among patients treated with and without antibiotics were 0.60% and 0.40%, respectively. The absence of antibiotics was not clinically inferior to using antibiotics (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS:Infection remains a rare complication following CRPP of SCH fractures. According to our current data, not giving perioperative antibiotics was not inferior to using perioperative antibiotics for preventing superficial or deep infection in patients undergoing CRPP of SCH fractures. With the increase in attention to antibiotic stewardship, it is important to eliminate unnecessary antibiotic use while continuing to maintain a low rate of surgical site infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level IV-case series. This is a therapeutic study that investigates the results from a case series.

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presented a novel challenge to modern healthcare systems and medical training. Resource allocation and risk mitigation dramatically affected resident training. The objective of this article is to develop new strategies to maintain a healthy, competent residency program while combating the unique challenges to resident education and wellness. In 2020, our institution implemented a revolving 3-Team system. While the "Inpatient-Team" delivered direct care, the "Back-up Team" and "Quarantine-Team" managed the telemedicine virtual clinic and education-wellness strategy, respectively. Our 3-Team system allowed delivery of safe, high-quality patient care while optimizing resident education, research, and wellness. The efficient use of technology led to both improved virtual education outside of the hospital and intentional wellness opportunities despite social distancing restrictions. Utilization of virtual platforms for patient care, education, research, and wellness grew out of necessity in this pandemic, yet represent an opportunity for lasting improvement. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(3):150-154, 2022).

The COVID-19 crisis has challenged the U.S. health-care system in a variety of ways, including how we teach and train orthopaedic surgery residents and fellows. During the spring of 2020, the cessation of all elective surgical procedures and the diminished number of outpatient visits challenged graduate medical education. While residency programs in less affected areas may not have had to make many dramatic adjustments, some of those located in pandemic hotspots had to redirect trainees from orthopaedic rotations to COVID-19 units. No matter the region, the time that trainees have spent in rotations has been altered, and absences have occurred due to quarantines. This symposium summarizes the impact of restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic on residency and fellowship programs from the perspectives of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), a program director, and a graduating resident. Although new opportunities for virtual curricula, virtual surgical simulation, and virtual interviews have been innovated, residency programs and residents report primarily a negative effect from the pandemic due to decreased surgical volumes and the limitation of patient-care experiences. Ultimately, program directors have an obligation to the program, the trainee, and the general public to graduate only those residents and fellows who are truly prepared to practice independently; they have the responsibility of making the final decision regarding graduation. The COVID-19 pandemic has continued to underscore the need for competency-based medical education. Assessing competency includes evaluation of the knowledge, the operative skills, the nonoperative patient-care skills, and the professional behavior of each and every individual graduating from orthopaedic residency and fellowship training programs. A hybrid model for time and competency-based training, with established national standards not only for accreditation for our training programs but also for board certification of our graduating residents, was enhanced by the COVID-19 pandemic and is highlighted in this symposium.

BACKGROUND:Managing the pulseless pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture (PSHF) remains a significant clinical decision-making challenge for the treating surgeon. The purpose of the study is to determine frequency of the treatments according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for the PSHF with vascular injury and evaluate the appropriateness of these interventions. METHODS:We identified all PSHF with concern for vascular injury at one high volume, level 1 trauma center managed by 6 fellowship-trained pediatric orthopaedic surgeons over 4.5 years. Demographic information and other injury and treatment variables were obtained. Each patient was classified as 1 of the 6 patient scenarios specified by the AAOS AUC. Each of the 18 interventions identified in the AUC were documented, including the level of "appropriateness" as specified by AAOS AUC. RESULTS:A total of 638 PSHF were managed identified; of these, 52 were pink, pulseless, or dysvascular (8.2%). Only 7 of the 18 treatment options suggested by the AUC were used in this cohort. Across all 7 interventions used in this cohort, 20.2% (17/84) of interventions were "appropriate," 52.4% (44/84) were "maybe appropriate," 22.6% (19/84) were "rarely appropriate," and 4.8% (4/84) were not listed in treatment options. CONCLUSIONS:Supracondylar fractures are the most common injury to the elbow seen in children and are variable in presentation and management. The pink, pulseless fracture continues to be a major topic for research and discussion due to the morbidity if not treated "appropriately." The AUC were created to help guide practitioners when strong evidence is lacking. In this study at a single, pediatric hospital, there was variation and disagreement with "appropriateness" of treatments that were performed but this discrepancy did not result in any poor outcomes. Although the AUC do offer valuable guidance, our findings highlight a need for continued research in this area to help validate the AUC and help strengthen the recommendations moving forward. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III-retrospective.

BACKGROUND:Clinician-scientist numbers have been stagnant over the past few decades despite awareness of this trend. Interventions attempting to change this problem have been seemingly ineffective, but research residency positions have shown potential benefit. OBJECTIVE:We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a clinician-scientist training program (CSTP) in an academic orthopedic residency in improving academic productivity and increasing interest in academic careers. METHODS:Resident training records were identified and reviewed for all residents who completed training between 1976 and 2014 (n = 329). There were no designated research residents prior to 1984 (pre-CSTP). Between 1984 and 2005, residents self-selected for the program (CSTP-SS). In 2005, residents were selected by program before residency (CSTP-PS). Residents were also grouped by program participation, research vs. clinical residents (RR vs. CR). Data were collected on academic positions and productivity through Internet-based and PubMed search, as well as direct e-mail or phone contact. Variables were then compared based on the time duration and designation. RESULTS:Comparing all RR with CR, RR residents were more likely to enter academic practice after training (RR, 34%; CR, 20%; p = 0.0001) and were 4 times more productive based on median publications (RR, 14; CR, 4; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, 42% of RR are still active in research compared to 29% of CR (p = 0.04), but no statistical difference in postgraduate academic productivity identified. CONCLUSIONS:The CSTP increased academic productivity during residency for the residents and the program. However, this program did not lead to a clear increase in academic productivity after residency and did not result in more trainees choosing a career as clinician-scientists.