Faculty Bibliography

Imaging plays an important role in evaluating peripheral nerves. In the preoperative setting, imaging helps overcome pitfalls of electrodiagnostic testing and provides key anatomical information to guide surgical management. In the postoperative setting, imaging also offers key information for treating physicians, although it comes with several challenges due to postsurgical changes and alteration of normal anatomy. This article reviews our approach to peripheral nerve imaging, including how we use imaging in the pre- and postoperative setting for several common indications.

OBJECTIVE:To describe the morphologic sonographic appearances and frequency of the "halo sign" in the setting of fat necrosis on shear wave elastography (SWE). METHODS:Patients with clinically suspected fat necrosis were prospectively scanned using SWE in addition to standard gray-scale and Doppler images. Cases were qualitatively grouped into one of three sonographic appearances: focal hypoechoic lesion with increased internal tissue stiffness ("focal stiffness"), focal hypoechoic lesion with isoechoic or hyperechoic periphery demonstrating increased tissue stiffness relative to the central hypoechoic lesion ("halo stiffness"), heterogeneously echogenic lesion with diffusely increased stiffness ("heterogeneous stiffness"). RESULTS:Exactly 19 patients met inclusion criteria (female n = 14; male n = 5). Shear wave velocities were recorded and retrospectively evaluated. The mean clinical follow-up was 11.4 months (range 3.0-25.5). Lesions demonstrated higher average tissue stiffness than background tissue (overall mass shear wave velocity 3.26 m/s, background 1.42 m/s, P < .001; lesion Young's modulus 40.85 kPa vs background 7.22 kPa, P < .001). The halo sign was identified in 10/19 (55%) patients. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The halo sign is a potentially useful sign in the setting of fat necrosis seen in the majority of clinically suspected cases.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic capability of ultrasonography (US) in patients with suspected brachial plexus injury (BPI) to the terminal nerves by comparing physical examination (PE) findings with US, electromyography (EMG), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reports. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:All patients at a single institution who underwent US for peripheral nerve injury of the brachial plexus and terminal nerves resulting in sensory-motor deficits from October 1, 2017 to October 31, 2023 were identified. A retrospective chart review was performed. Each PE, US, EMG, and MRI reports were given an overall rating: "normal" or "abnormal." Terminal nerves (musculocutaneous, axillary, radial, ulnar, medial) were individually assessed as "normal" or "abnormal." The interobserver agreement between reports was calculated using Cohen kappa. Specificity and sensitivity analyses were performed to determine diagnostic accuracy and were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 120 patients were included. Most injuries were traumatic in nature (78.8%) and were low-energy (53.8%). When each imaging modality was compared with the PE findings, EMG had the highest interobserver agreement (Cohen kappa = 0.18), followed by US (Cohen kappa = 0.10), and last MRI (Cohen kappa = 0.07). The US had the highest sensitivity (0.92, CI = 0.85, 0.96) among the 3 imaging modalities (Table 2). On US, the ulnar nerve was most commonly abnormal (n = 84, 70.0%). DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:Ultrasonography serves as a useful adjunct in the workup of patients with suspected peripheral BPI and is reliable in localizing the pathology of injured terminal nerves in the brachial plexus.

During the past four decades, ultrasound has become popular as an imaging modality applied to the musculoskeletal (MSK) system, particularly outside the USA, due to its low cost, accessibility, and lack of ionizing radiation. A basic requirement in performing these examinations is to have a core group of radiologists and ultrasound technologists with expertise in MSK ultrasound. The extent to which ultrasound will be part of the imaging offered by a particular radiology practice or in an academic institution will vary according to expertise, availability, and reimbursements. A brief discussion of the technical capabilities of the current generation of ultrasound scanners will be followed by a description of some of the more prevalent MSK ultrasound imaging applications. The extent to which training to perform these exams within and outside of Radiology plays a role is discussed. Applications that are unique to ultrasound, such as dynamic evaluation of musculoskeletal anatomy and some, US-guided interventions are an important part of MSK imaging. Ultrasound is increasingly important in the assessment of superficial structures, such as tendons, small joints, and peripheral nerves. These applications help to establish the place of ultrasound as an important part of the Radiologists approach to MSK imaging. Outside of radiology, for a variety of clinical subspecialties, ultrasound already plays an integral role in MSK imaging.

Pronator syndrome is a median nerve entrapment neuropathy that can be difficult to diagnose due to its variable presentation and objective findings. Neurolymphomatosis is an uncommon disease in which malignant lymphocytes infiltrate central or peripheral nerve endoneurium and is often missed for prolonged periods prior to diagnosis. We present a rare case of pronator syndrome and anterior interosseous nerve palsy due to neurolymphomatosis that was occult on initial MRI in spite of the presence of a median nerve mass discovered intra-operatively during neurolysis. This case demonstrates the value of ultrasound for the examination of peripheral nerve pathology and illustrates its utility as an adjunct to MRI, in part due to the ability to screen a large region.

Ultrasound visualization affords proceduralists versatile and accurate guidance for a variety of percutaneous, minimally invasive procedures in the musculoskeletal system including joint (intra-articular) injections or aspirations, intra-bursal injections, peritendinous, and perineural injections. A variety of percutaneous procedures are traditionally performed blindly, but may be more easily or more accurately performed with the real-time assistance of ultrasound guidance. Other procedures are only possible utilizing image-guidance, due to the required precision of the injection because of delicate local anatomy or depth of the injection; ultrasound is a safe, portable, and widespread modality that can be used to assist the proceduralist in localizing the needle tip in such cases, to ensure safe and accurate delivery of the medication, most frequently a solution of steroid and anesthetic. This review aims to provide a foundational approach to ultrasound-guided procedures in the musculoskeletal system, offering tips and tricks that can be employed in many different procedures including intra-articular, juxta-articular, and perineural injections for a multitude of clinical scenarios. Technical considerations regarding ultrasound transducer selection, sonographic technique, as well as common indications, contraindications, and complications of these procedures, are presented. Additionally, a variety of pharmacologic considerations for proceduralists contemplating ultrasound-guided injections are discussed.

Multimodality imaging of the brachial plexus is essential to accurately localize the lesion and characterize the pathology and site of injury. A combination of computed tomography (CT), ultrasound, and MR imaging is useful along with clinical and nerve conduction studies. Ultrasound and MR imaging in combination are effective to accurately localize the pathology in most of the cases. Accurate reporting of the pathology with dedicated MR imaging protocols in conjunction with Doppler ultrasound and dynamic imaging provides practical and useful information to help the referring physicians and surgeons to optimize medical or surgical treatment regimens.

Preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions using a radar reflector surgical guidance system has become commonplace, but the clinical utility of this emerging technology in the musculoskeletal system has not yet been well established. The system components include a console, a handpiece, an implanted radiofrequency reflector that works as a lesion marker, and an infrared light-emitting probe to guide the surgeon. The reflector can be deployed to localize small nonpalpable nodules within the subcutaneous fat as well as lesions within the deeper soft tissues. It can also be used for lymph nodes and foreign bodies. Localization can be performed both before and after treatment. The objective of this article is to describe the potential applications and our technique and initial experience for radar-reflector localization within the musculoskeletal system.

A variety of foot and ankle pathologies can impair patient's daily activities, ultimately requiring surgical management. However, with improvements in image-guided intervention, the joints, soft tissues, and osseous structures may be accessible using various percutaneous techniques as a potential alternative therapeutic tool, avoiding the need for surgery with its associated risks and morbidity. This article discusses the potential range of image-guided interventional treatments. Injections, aspiration, biopsies, cryoablation, and radiofrequency ablation are described. Newer novel treatments are also covered. Finally, the common pathologies of Morton's neuroma, Achilles tendinopathy, and plantar fasciitis are addressed.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To determine the incidence of infectious complications following ultrasound-guided musculoskeletal interventions performed with a disinfected uncovered ultrasound transducer footprint. METHODS:Electronic medical records of all patients who underwent an ultrasound-guided musculoskeletal procedure (including injection, calcific lavage, or ganglion cyst aspiration) performed by any of the 14 interventional musculoskeletal radiologists at our institution between January 2013 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed to identify procedure site infections. Biopsies and joint aspirations were excluded. The procedures were performed using a disinfected uncovered transducer footprint. First, an automated chart review identified cases with (1) positive answers to the nurse's post-procedure call, (2) an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnostic code related to a musculoskeletal infection, or (3) an antibiotic prescription within 30 days post-procedure. Then, these cases were manually reviewed for evidence of procedure site infection. RESULTS:In total, 6511 procedures were included. The automated chart review identified 3 procedures (2 patients) in which post-procedural fever was reported during the nurse's post-procedure call, 33 procedures (28 patients) with an ICD code for a musculoskeletal infection, and 220 procedures (216 patients) with an antibiotic prescription within 30 post-procedural days. The manual chart review of these patients revealed no cases of confirmed infection and 1 case (0.015%) of possible site infection. CONCLUSIONS:The incidence of infectious complications after an ultrasound-guided musculoskeletal procedure performed with an uncovered transducer footprint is extremely low. This information allows radiologists to counsel their patients more precisely when obtaining informed consent. KEY POINTS/CONCLUSIONS:• Infectious complications after ultrasound-guided musculoskeletal procedures performed with a disinfected uncovered transducer footprint are extremely rare.