Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a connective tissue disorder characterized by fragile bones and vascular fragility, increasing the risk of vessel dissection and potentially complicating endovascular intervention. The authors present the first case of cranial bypass in a patient with OI. OBSERVATIONS/METHODS:A 38-year-old male with OI type I presented with a symptomatic left internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusive dissection managed with endovascular revascularization and stenting. Follow-up surveillance imaging identified an incidental right ICA dissection, also treated with stenting. Four years later, the patient experienced new right hemispheric symptoms. He was found to have progressive right ICA dissection on best medical management. Following an unsuccessful restenting attempt, he underwent a successful double-barrel superficial temporal artery-to-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass to restore cerebral perfusion with no perioperative complications. Six-month follow-up DSA confirmed a patent bypass with robust flow, and the patient remained asymptomatic 1 year postoperatively. LESSONS/CONCLUSIONS:STA-MCA bypass can serve as a viable and effective revascularization option in patients with OI, whose disease predisposes them to vascular dissection. In these high-risk patients, cranial bypass is a safe method for effective flow augmentation to hypoperfused brain regions when endovascular interventions fail. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE25378.

Definitive endoluminal reconstruction, widely known as flow diversion, revolutionized treatment of brain aneurysms. A range of targets, by location, size, etiology, and acuity, can be cured with an excellent risk/benefit profile. Requirement for effective antiplatelet state is balanced with superior treatment durability. Implant and delivery system technology continue to evolve. Some aneurysm types/locations remain undertreated. Maximizing efficacy while minimizing risks requires deep understanding of flow diversion principles, pathologic anatomy, endoluminal implants, delivery systems, and clinical management.

OBJECTIVE:To validate the carotid web (CW) risk stratification assessment described in previous works within a larger cohort of patients with symptomatic and incidentally found asymptomatic CWs. METHODS:A retrospective analysis of our institution's electronic medical records identified all patients with a diagnosis of CW from 2017 to 2024. We included symptomatic patients and those with asymptomatic CWs, that is, incidentally found webs without history of stroke or transient ischemic attack. Patient charts were reviewed for demographics, imaging, comorbidities, and a diagnosis of stroke after diagnosis of asymptomatic CW. All angles were measured as described in previous work on a sagittal reconstruction of neck CT angiography in which the common carotid artery (CCA), external carotid artery, and internal carotid artery (ICA) were well visualized, together with the CW itself. Principal component analysis and logistic regression were performed to evaluate the association between high-risk angles and stroke risk.  RESULTS: Twenty-six symptomatic and 26 asymptomatic patients were identified. Of note, the number of patients with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and smoking history was 17 (65.0%), 16 (62.0%), and 8 (31.0%) for symptomatic patients and 18 (69.0%), 17 (65.0%), and 15 (58.0%) for asymptomatic patients. All angular measurements showed statistically significant associations with stroke status. The CCA-web-pouch angle showed the strongest association (p=2.07×10⁻⁴), followed by the CCA-pouch-tip angle (p=3.23×10⁻⁴), ICA-web-pouch angle (p=0.004), and ICA-pouch-tip angle (p=0.005). Each additional high-risk angle increased the odds of stroke by 9.47-fold (p<0.0001). The associated probability of stroke increased from 6.3% with no high-risk angles to 39.1% with one high-risk angle and further to 85.9% with two high-risk angles. The model demonstrated high sensitivity, correctly identifying 84.6% of positive cases, and high specificity, correctly identifying 88.5% of negative cases. The F1 score was 0.863, indicating good overall model performance.  CONCLUSION: Given this successful stratification of CWs into high- and low-risk groups, the utilization of geometric CW parameters may play a role in improving patient selection for intervention in the setting of incidentally diagnosed CW. .

BACKGROUND:The Drivewire 24 (DW24) is a newly FDA-cleared 0.024 inch steerable guidewire. Its proximally controlled deflectable tip allows for intravascular steering to facilitate selective navigation of diagnostic or therapeutic catheters. We present the first clinical experience with the DW24. METHODS:All neurointerventional procedures using the DW24 from October 2024 to April 2025 were retrospectively reviewed. Indications, procedural details, DW24 performance, wire-related complications, and operator feedback were assessed. RESULTS:27 procedures were performed utilizing the DW24. Indications included aneurysm (n=16), stroke (n=5), arteriovenous fistula or malformation (n=4), and diagnostic venography (n=2). Technical success was achieved in 92.6% of cases. Target vessels included the MCA, anterior cerebral artery, posterior cerebral artery, internal carotid artery segments, transverse sinus, and torcula. The device's radiopaque, hydrophilic distal tip aided fluoroscopic visibility, and the variable support enabled articulation across a range of aspiration and delivery catheters without requiring additional support devices. The DW24's steerability enabled access to challenging cerebrovascular anatomy, including one stroke case where conventional guidewires failed to reach a distal M2 occlusion. The DW24's intravascular steering also allowed for the delivery of catheters for Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) deployment and facilitated PED post-processing to improve wall apposition without requiring wire removal, reshaping, or balloon angioplasty. Operators observed a short learning curve. There were no device-related complications, though the wire's response to rotational force was a limitation. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The DW24 demonstrated a high technical success rate with no device-related complications. Its versatility across catheter sizes and precise controllability facilitate navigating complex cerebrovasculature. Further studies should assess efficacy in larger cohorts across additional clinical scenarios.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Iatrogenic cerebrovascular injury can cause intracranial hemorrhage and pseudoaneurysm formation, putting patients at high risk for postoperative bleeding. No consensus for management exists. This study describes endovascular treatment of these acute injuries with flow diverter stents. METHODS:Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed for injury type and etiology, timing of diagnosis, and endovascular management, including antiplatelet regimens, embolization results, and clinical outcome. RESULTS:Six patients were included. Three suffered an injury to the internal carotid artery, 1 suffered an injury to the left anterior cerebral artery, 1 suffered an injury to the right posterior cerebral artery, and 1 suffered an injury to the basilar artery. Four of the 6 injuries occurred during attempted tumor resection, 1 occurred during cerebrospinal fluid leak repair, and 1 occurred during an ophthalmic artery aneurysm clipping. All injuries resulted in pseudoaneurysm formation. Four were immediately detected on angiography; 2 were initially negative on imaging. Five were treated with a pipeline embolization device, and 1 was treated with a Silk Vista Baby. Two were treated with 2 pipeline embolization devices telescopically overlapped across the pseudoaneurysm. All devices deployed successfully. No pseudoaneurysm recurrence or rebleeding occurred. No parent artery occlusion or stenosis was observed, and complete pseudoaneurysm occlusion was observed in 4 patients (in 2 patients, follow-up imaging could not be obtained). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:With proper antiplatelet regimens, flow diverter stents can be used safely to successfully treat complex acute iatrogenic injuries. Early repeat angiogram is needed when immediate postinjury imaging does not discover the point of vessel injury.

IntroductionFlow diversion with the pipeline embolization device (PED) is an effective endovascular treatment. However, the metal surface's thrombogenicity and need for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) are notable limitations. Few prior studies have reported specifically on flow diverters' safety in patients with hemoglobinopathies, a population at increased risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications.MethodsNatural language processing queried our institution's medical records for intracranial embolization procedures from 2014 to 2024, screening for "hemoglobinopathy," "thalassemia," and "sickle cell." Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsSixteen procedures in 14 patients were identified in which a mean 2.0 PEDs per patient were used. Most patients were female (71.4%). Median age was 48.8 years. Five patients had sickle cell disease, two had sickle cell trait, two had sickle cell or hemoglobin C trait and alpha thalassemia minor, and five had alpha thalassemia minor. The 14 patients were treated for 20 aneurysms; four treatments covered two distinct aneurysms. Median dome size per treatment was 4.0 mm. Of the 16 aneurysm treatments, five (31.2%) treated an irregular aneurysm. Most (56.2%) treatments used multiple PEDs. All patients were discharged on DAPT after verifying effect with P2Y12 assays. Follow-up DSA, CTA, or MRA was obtained in 12/14 (85.7%) patients at a median 1.6 years. Complete occlusion was achieved in all aneurysms. Clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients at a median 2.2 years. There were no thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications, neurological deficits, or mortalities.ConclusionPipeline embolization can safely and effectively treat patients with hemoglobinopathies.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE/BACKGROUND:Rhino-orbital cerebral mucormycosis (ROCM) is an aggressive fungal infection involving the paranasal sinuses, orbit, and intracranial cavity, with a propensity for vascular invasion. This can lead to complications such as internal carotid artery (ICA) thrombosis and occlusion, presenting major neurosurgical challenges. Although surgical debridement and antifungal therapy are the mainstays of treatment, cases with significant neurovascular involvement require specialized intervention. We report a case of ROCM with severe flow-limiting ICA stenosis treated by direct extracranial-intracranial bypass. CLINICAL PRESENTATION/METHODS:tA 65-year-old man with diabetes presented with progressive left-sided blindness and facial numbness. Imaging revealed a left orbital mass extending into the paranasal sinuses and intracranially. Empiric antifungal therapy was started. Pathology confirmed Rhizopus species. Despite extensive surgical debridement and antifungal therapy, the patient developed progressive severe cavernous ICA stenosis, leading to watershed territory strokes. To restore cerebral perfusion, protect from distal emboli, and prepare for potential aggressive debridement, a flow-replacing direct (superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (M2)) bypass was performed, and the supraclinoid carotid was trapped. Intraoperative angiography confirmed robust flow through the bypass. The patient was discharged on antifungal therapy and aspirin. At 6-month follow-up, the patient was neurologically intact with an modified Rankin Scale score of 1. Computed tomography angiography and transcranioplasty Doppler ultrasonography confirmed good flow through the bypass. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In addition to antifungal therapy and surgical debridement, superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery bypass can be a lifesaving intervention in the management of ROCM with severe cerebrovascular compromise. This case highlights the critical role of cranial bypass in preserving cerebral perfusion in patients with flow-limiting ROCM-associated ICA invasion.

Typical carotid webs are nonatherosclerotic shelf-like projections of fibromyxoid tissue extending from the posterior wall of the proximal internal carotid artery (ICA). Carotid webs may precipitate acute embolic stroke, especially in younger patients. We describe our experience with pathology-proven carotid webs of atypical appearance, or atypical carotid webs (ACWs), a subset of carotid webs exhibiting abnormal location, morphology, or association with atherosclerotic changes. Our electronic medical record database was queried for all imaging impressions containing "carotid web," "shelf," or "protrusion" from 2018-2024. Imaging was reviewed by an experienced neuroradiologist and neurosurgeon. Patients with typical carotid webs or those with different diagnoses (e.g. dissection/thrombus) were excluded. Twenty-seven patients were treated for typical carotid webs; 24 were treated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and had pathology-confirmed webs. Five patients (three male) were identified to have ACWs and included in this report. Mean age was 43.6 years. All ACWs were identified by computed tomography angiography (CTA). All patients presented with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). One web was located on the anterior ICA wall, three were of abnormal morphology different from a "shelf-like" projection, and one was associated with atherosclerotic change. No patients experienced a further stroke or TIA following CEA. ACWs may precipitate ischemic stroke and can be treated and definitively diagnosed with CEA. Due to their unusual appearance, ACWs may evade radiographic identification or be misdiagnosed. As ACWs have not been previously reported in the literature, awareness of their existence must be raised to increase their detection and treatment.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass is the workhorse for flow augmentation surgery. Although either interrupted or running sutures can be used to complete the anastomosis with high intraoperative patency rates, no previous study in the cranial bypass literature has compared long-term patency and maturity of end-to-side STA-MCA anastomoses. We compared STA-MCA anastomoses performed with running vs interrupted sutures by evaluating bypass flow and anastomotic maturation on follow-up vascular imaging. METHODS:Ninety-six STA-MCA anastomoses were performed from 1/2019 to 6/2024. Forty-seven anastomoses (40 patients) with long-term vascular imaging were retrospectively analyzed. All anastomoses were intraoperatively patent on initial revascularization. Patient demographics, clinical course, and imaging were reviewed. All images were reviewed by a neuroradiologist or a cerebrovascular neurosurgeon. RESULTS:Twenty-five anastomoses were performed with interrupted sutures and compared with 22 anastomoses performed with running sutures. All patients underwent a preoperative perfusion assessment confirming a significant hypoperfusion state. There were no significant differences between cohorts in demographics, bypass indication, or time to follow-up. Formal digital subtraction angiography was performed for 35 anastomoses (21 interrupted, 14 running). On digital subtraction angiography follow-up, there was no difference in STA caliber between cohorts (P = .204), but there was a difference in anastomotic growth (P = .014), with 5/21 (23.8%) anastomoses stable or enlarged in the interrupted cohort vs 9/14 (64.3%) stable or enlarged in the running cohort. Notably, of the 47 total anastomoses, there was no difference in long-term bypass patency between interrupted and running anastomoses (22/25 (88.0%) vs 22/22 (100.0%), respectively, P = .380). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:No significant differences in patency or STA caliber on follow-up imaging were observed between STA-MCA anastomoses performed with interrupted vs running sutures although a difference in anastomotic maturity was observed, with the running suture cohort having a higher proportion of enlarged or stable anastomoses. Further studies are needed for validation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Robotics are becoming increasingly widespread within various neurosurgical subspecialties, but data pertaining to their feasibility in vascular neurosurgery are limited. We present our novel attempt to evaluate the learning curve of a robotic platform for microvascular anastomoses. METHODS:One hundred and sixty one sutures were performed and assessed. Fourteen anastomoses (10 robotic [MUSA-2 Microsurgical system; Microsure] and 4 hand-sewn) were performed by the senior author on 1.5-mm caliber tubes and recorded with the Kinevo 900 (Zeiss) operative microscope. We separately compared interrupted sutures (from needle insertion until third knot) and running sutures (from needle insertion until loop pull-down). Average suture timing across all groups was compared using an unpaired Student's t test. Exponential smoothing (α = 0.2) was then applied to the robotic data sets for validation and a second set of t tests were performed. RESULTS:We compared 107 robotic sutures with 54 hand-sewn sutures. There was a significant difference between the average time/stitch for the robotic running sutures (n = 55) and the hand-sewn running sutures (n = 31) (31.2 seconds vs 48.3 seconds, respectively; P-value = .00052). Exponential smoothing (α = 0.2) reinforced these results (37.6 seconds vs 48.3 seconds; P-value = .014625). Average robotic running times surpassed hand-sewn by the second anastomosis (38.8 seconds vs 48.3 seconds) and continued to steadily decrease with subsequent stitches. The average of the robotic interrupted sutures (n = 52) was significantly longer than the hand-sewn (n = 23) (171.3 seconds vs 70 seconds; P = .000024). Exponential smoothing (α = 0.2) yielded similar results (196.7 seconds vs 70 seconds; P = .00001). However, average robotic interrupted times significantly decreased from the first to the final anastomosis (286 seconds vs 105.2 seconds; P = .003674). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our results indicate the learning curve for robotic microanastomoses is short and encouraging. The use of robotics warrants further study for potential use in cerebrovascular bypass procedures.