Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:For more than half of Crohn's disease patients, strictures will cause bowel obstructions that require surgery within 10 years of their initial diagnosis. This study utilizes computed tomography imaging and clinical data obtained at the initial emergency room visit to create a prediction model for progression to surgery in Crohn's disease patients with acute small bowel obstructions. METHODS:A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who presented to the emergency room with an ICD-10 diagnosis for Crohn's disease and visit diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. Two expert abdominal radiologists evaluated the CT scans for bowel wall thickness, maximal and minimal luminal diameters, length of diseased segment, passage of oral contrast, evidence of penetrating disease, bowel wall hyperenhancement or stratification, presence of a comb sign, fat hypertrophy, and small bowel feces sign. The primary outcome was progression to surgery within 6 months of presentation. The secondary outcome was time to readmission. RESULTS:Forty patients met the inclusion criteria, with 78% receiving medical treatment alone and 22% undergoing surgery within 6 months of presentation to the emergency room. Multivariable analysis produced a model with an AUC of 92% (95% CI 0.82-1.00), 78% sensitivity, and 97% specificity, using gender, body mass index, and the radiographic features of segment length, penetrating disease, and bowel wall hyperenhancement. CONCLUSIONS:The model demonstrates that routine clinical and radiographic data from an emergency room visit can predict progression to surgery, and has the potential to risk stratify patients, guide management in the acute setting, and predict readmission.

Background/UNASSIGNED:To create meaningful quality improvement (QI) curricula for graduate medical education (GME) trainees, institutions strive to improve coordination of QI curricula with hospital improvement infrastructure. Objective/UNASSIGNED:We created a curriculum to teach residents about QI and value-based medicine (VBM) and assessed curricular effectiveness. Methods/UNASSIGNED:We designed a 2-week required curriculum for internal medicine residents at a large academic program. After participating in basic skills workshops, trainees developed QI/VBM project ideas with faculty and nonclinical support and pitched them to hospital leaders at the end of the rotation. Pre-post and 1-year follow-up surveys were conducted for residents to self-assess knowledge, attitudes, and skills, participation in QI/VBM projects, and career intentions. We tracked QI/VBM project implementation. Results/UNASSIGNED: < .01). Four of 19 projects have been implemented. At 1 year, 95% of residents had presented a quality/value poster presentation, 44% were involved in QI/VBM beyond required rotations, and 26% plan to pursue careers focused on improving quality, safety, or value. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Our project-based curriculum culminating in a project pitch to hospital leadership was acceptable to GME trainees, improved self-assessed skills sustained at 1 year, and resulted in successfully implemented QI/VBM projects.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:With the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the current worldwide pandemic, there is mounting evidence that patients affected by the illness may develop clinically significant coagulopathy with thromboembolic complications including ischemic stroke. However, there is limited data on the clinical characteristics, stroke mechanism, and outcomes of patients who have a stroke and COVID-19. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with ischemic stroke who were hospitalized between March 15, 2020, and April 19, 2020, within a major health system in New York, the current global epicenter of the pandemic. We compared the clinical characteristics of stroke patients with a concurrent diagnosis of COVID-19 to stroke patients without COVID-19 (contemporary controls). In addition, we compared patients to a historical cohort of patients with ischemic stroke discharged from our hospital system between March 15, 2019, and April 15, 2019 (historical controls). RESULTS:<0.001). When compared with contemporary controls, COVID-19 positive patients had higher admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and higher peak D-dimer levels. When compared with historical controls, COVID-19 positive patients were more likely to be younger men with elevated troponin, higher admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Patients with COVID-19 and stroke had significantly higher mortality than historical and contemporary controls. CONCLUSIONS:We observed a low rate of imaging-confirmed ischemic stroke in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Most strokes were cryptogenic, possibly related to an acquired hypercoagulability, and mortality was increased. Studies are needed to determine the utility of therapeutic anticoagulation for stroke and other thrombotic event prevention in patients with COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged front-line clinical decision-making, leading to numerous published prognostic tools. However, few models have been prospectively validated and none report implementation in practice. Here, we use 3345 retrospective and 474 prospective hospitalizations to develop and validate a parsimonious model to identify patients with favorable outcomes within 96 h of a prediction, based on real-time lab values, vital signs, and oxygen support variables. In retrospective and prospective validation, the model achieves high average precision (88.6% 95% CI: [88.4-88.7] and 90.8% [90.8-90.8]) and discrimination (95.1% [95.1-95.2] and 86.8% [86.8-86.9]) respectively. We implemented and integrated the model into the EHR, achieving a positive predictive value of 93.3% with 41% sensitivity. Preliminary results suggest clinicians are adopting these scores into their clinical workflows.

BACKGROUND:Common mechanisms against small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), including an intact ileocecal valve, gastric acid secretion, intestinal motility, and an intact immune system, are compromised in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and therefore, a relatively high incidence of SIBO has been reported in this population. AIMS/OBJECTIVE:We aimed to determine whether an improvement in IBD clinical activity scores is seen after testing and treating SIBO. METHODS:A retrospective cohort study of 147 patients with inflammatory bowel disease who were referred for SIBO breath testing from 1/2012 to 5/2016 was performed. Characteristics of SIBO positive and treated patients were compared to SIBO negative patients, including the changes in Partial Mayo Score or Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI), using Student's t test for continuous variables and Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS:61.9% were SIBO positive and treated, and 38.1% were SIBO negative. In Crohn's disease, the median HBI decreased from 5 to 3 and 5 to 4, in the SIBO positive and negative groups, respectively (p = 0.005). In ulcerative colitis, the Partial Mayo Score decreased from 2 to 1.5 and 2 to 1, respectively (p = 0.607). CONCLUSIONS:This study examines the clinical effect of testing and treating for SIBO in an IBD population. We see a significant reduction in HBI after testing for and treating SIBO. Future prospective studies are necessary to further investigate the role of SIBO in the evaluation and management of IBD.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in the US and is largely preventable with lifestyle and medications. Statins are among the most prescribed medications in the United States. While several large trials have shown statins to be safe and effective, rare adverse events may be seen including the development or exacerbation of ulcerative colitis (UC). A 66-year-old woman with UC (diagnosed 5 years prior; well controlled on mesalamine with rare breakthrough symptoms), hypertension, hyperlipidemia, family history of premature CAD and 15+ pack year smoking history was evaluated for primary prevention of CVD and started on atorvastatin. Upon starting atorvastatin she noted myalgias and recurrence of proctitis. A colonoscopy at that time demonstrated active inflammation in the distal 5 cm of the rectum. All symptoms abated upon discontinuing the statin. Years later she was noted to be at increased risk for CVD, with an elevated coronary calcium score of 89 and an LDL of 149, and was re-challenged with low dose rosuvastatin. Soon after initiation, the patient again experienced a flare, this time requiring steroids to achieve remission despite stopping the statin. There is a paucity of data on statin-induced colitis. One reported case of pravastatin induced severe UC lead to colectomy and subsequent death, and several cases of statin-induced colitis have been reported to manufacturers. A RCT of 64 patients with UC and mild-moderate activity given atorvastatin vs. placebo for 8 weeks showed that patients on atorvastatin had worse outcomes (an increase of partial Mayo score by 1.5 points vs. decrease by 0.31 on placebo (p = 0.04)). However, a large retrospective, matched case-control study of 9,617 cases of IBD and 46,665 controls showed any statin exposure was associated with a significantly decreased risk of IBD (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.64-0.72): CD (0.64, 95% CI 0.59-0.71), and UC (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.65-0.76). This effect was similar for most statins and present regardless of the intensity of therapy. Given the known benefits of statin therapy in the prevention and treatment of CVD and conflicting data about its effects on IBD, patients with UC who are eligible for statin therapy should proceed with treatment but be counseled that they may be more susceptible to a flare. If UC symptoms are exacerbated, an alternative statin should not be employed. Instead, a different class of lipid-lowering therapy should be tried

Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often requires treatment with immune modulating medications (biologics). Although biologic agents have been shown to have excellent efficacy in treating IBD patients, the substantial cost has become a barrier to treatment for many patients. Recently, biosimilar drugs have been developed. Many clinical trials have demonstrated similar efficacy of biosimilars compared to originator biologics in IBD patients. Patients' perception and knowledge regarding these drugs is not known. We surveyed IBD patients to assess perceptions and knowledge regarding biosimilar medications and willingness to switch from biologics to biosimilars. Methods: 121 consecutive adult patients in a single outpatient gastroenterology clinic with a pre-existing diagnosis of IBD were surveyed between March and May 2017. Data was then compiled and analyzed. Patients were excluded if they were not able to read English. Results: The mean age of the survey participants was 37.8 +/- 15.5 years. Sixty-three percent of the participants were male. Fifty-three patients (43.8%) carried a diagnosis of UC. Sixty-seven patients (55.3%) had Crohn's disease (CD). One patient was not sure of his/her diagnosis. Significantly more CD patients than UC were currently on infliximab or adalimumab (35 vs 16, p=0.014). Only 33 participants (27%) have heard of "biosimilar medications" prior to this study. Seventy-six percent of all participants were uncomfortable using a biosimilar medication that had not been tested in clinical trials specifically for UC or CD. 57% participants were uncomfortable exchanging their current medication for a biosimilar. 92% of all participants wanted to be informed prior to switching to a biosimilar medication. There was a statistically significant correlation between the number of years since diagnosis and the patient's comfort with switching to a biosimilar medication (r=0.203, p=0.027). Conclusion: By investigating patient perceptions and knowledge regarding biosimilars, we hope to better understand patients' level of comfort, preferences, and potential barriers to implementation. Most IBD patients were uncomfortable using a biosimilar that has not been evaluate in a clinical trial in IBD. Of interest, a longer time since diagnosis of CD was associated with increased comfort of switching from biologic to biosimilar. This information will help physicians form their approach to introducing and discussing these biosimilars with patients. (Table Presented)

Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapy is continuously evolving with novel drugs targeting various inflammatory pathways. Ustekinumab (USK), a monoclonal antibody inhibiting the IL-12/23 pathway, was approved in September 2016 to treat moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD). While safety data in IBD is limited, USK has been used to treat other autoimmune diseases with favorable safety profiles. We aimed to establish rates of adverse events (AE) and demonstrate non-inferiority of AE of USK compared to placebo and other biologics. Methods: MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase databases were searched in May 2017 using terms "ustekinumab" and "clinical trials." Two authors independently performed quality assessment and dual extraction. Randomized control trials comparing USK to placebo or other biologics regardless of disease were included. The primary outcome was the odds ratio (OR) of AE of USK vs placebo, expressed as pooled OR and 95% confidence interval (CI). Secondary outcomes included OR of mild/moderate and serious AE (SAE) in USK vs placebo, USK vs biologics, and low vs high-dose USK, respectively (Table 2). A sub-analysis of outcomes in CD trials was performed. Random effects meta-analysis was performed for all outcomes. Results: 16 papers with 6756 subjects (44% female) were included (Fig 1). Infections were the most common AE (Table 1). The OR of serious AE in USK vs placebo was 0.76 (95% CI 0.56-1.03, Fig 2). The OR of mild-to-moderate AE in the USK vs placebo was 1.12 (95% CI 1.01-1.24), suggesting increased risk of mild/moderate AE with USK (Fig 3). However, this was no longer significant after sub-analysis of the three CD trials. Analysis of 5 trials comparing low vs high-dose USK revealed an OR of 0.96 (95% CI 0.46-2.04) for SAE and 1.17 (95% CI 0.98-1.39) for mild-to-moderate AE. Use of USK was not associated with increased AE compared to other biologics, with OR of 0.91 (95% CI 0.61-1.35) for SAE and 0.98 (95% CI 0.85-1.13) for mild/moderate AE. Heterogeneity was low for all calculations. Conclusion: USK has a comparable safety profile to placebo and other biologics in the treatment of various diseases, although we did find a mildly elevated risk of mild/moderate AE with USK; however, this (Figure Presented) was not seen in CD trials. The favorable safety profile of USK is of clinical importance with the advent of USK in CD and ongoing clinical trials for ulcerative colitis. More data on long-term safety data in the IBD population is needed