Faculty Bibliography

Several masses and pseudomasses may present in the orbit, and cross-sectional imaging plays a crucial role in interrogation of these lesions. A strong understanding of orbital anatomy and the pathologies that may affect the structures within allows the radiologist to narrow the differential diagnosis. This article aims to discuss these pathologies with attention to the site of origin, to provide a practical approach to imaging of orbital tumors. While many lesions have characteristic appearances, many features overlap and require correlation with tissue sampling. Nevertheless, imaging is an essential first step to diagnosis, surgical planning, surveillance, and follow-up of orbital masses.

OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To better characterize the cochlear apex in relation to surgically relevant landmarks to guide surgeons and improve procedural success of apical electrode placement. STUDY DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective image analysis. SETTING/UNASSIGNED:Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS/UNASSIGNED:Cochlear implant recipients with available preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging. INTERVENTION/UNASSIGNED:None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE/UNASSIGNED:Cochlear dimensions and cochlear apex distance measures to surgically relevant middle ear landmarks and critical structures. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Eighty-two temporal bone CT scans were analyzed utilizing multiplanar reformats. The average lateral width of promontory bone over the cochlear apex was 1.2 mm (standard deviation [SD], 0.3). The anteroposterior distance from the round window (avg, 4.2 mm; SD, 0.5), oval window (avg, 3.3 mm; SD, 0.3), cochleariform process (avg, 2.3; SD, 0.5), and superior-inferior distance from the cochleariform process (avg, -0.9; SD, 0.8) to the cochlear apex were measured. The relationship of the cochlear apex to critical structures was highly variable.A newly developed stapes vector was created and found to mark the posterior/superior boundary of the apex in 94% of patients. When a vector parallel to the stapes vector was drawn through the round window, it marked the anterior/inferior boundary of the cochlear apex in 89% of patients. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:This study assists in characterizing cochlear apex anatomy and its relation to surrounding structures as a means of improving procedural accuracy and reducing trauma during apical cochleostomy. Understanding both distance relationships and expected boundaries of the apex could help to inform future surgical approaches.