Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Although kidney transplant candidates receive education regarding transplantation and donation, little is known about the extent of their comprehension. We aimed to identify factors that affect patient comprehension of important concepts regarding kidney transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS/METHODS:We performed a cross-sectional survey of consecutive adult kidney transplant candidates seen at our center between July 2013 and October 2013 for initial evaluation (n=100) or for reevaluation (n=117). The main outcome measure was a Knowledge Assessment Questionnaire completed by patients. We assessed factors affecting patient understanding of key kidney transplant concepts as measured by mean knowledge score. RESULTS:Mean knowledge scores of those at evaluation (72±21) and those at reevaluation (70±20; p=0.4769) were similar; therefore the entire cohort was analyzed as a single group. Compared to the high-scoring group, low-scorers (<75%; median value) were significantly more likely to be older, Hispanic, with lower education attainment, and have end-stage renal disease due to hypertension or diabetes rather than other etiologies. On multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for low-scores were increasing age (aOR 1.03 (95% CI 1.01-1.06) and educational level (less than high school; aOR 4.23, 95%CI 1.82-9.80; high school or GED aOR2.85, 95% CI 1.43-5.70 compared to some college or technical school). Of 139 candidates that consented to receive ECD and 152 consenting to CDCHR kidneys, 52% and 27%, respectively, answered the high-risk-specific question incorrectly. CONCLUSIONS:Educational level and older age are independent risk factors for poor comprehension. Kidney candidate knowledge of organs with increased risks is suboptimal despite previous consent to receive such organs.

OBJECTIVE:Referrals between physician specialties are common practice, and clear patterns develop. The increasing availability of high-volume endocrine surgery subspecialists with better outcomes may change these patterns. This study aimed to determine what factors influence endocrinologists' referral patterns for the surgical treatment of endocrine disease. METHODS:A national, cross-sectional, voluntary survey of members of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists examined physician demographics, physician's opinions on referral to endocrine surgery, preferred surgeon specialty, knowledge about surgeon characteristics, and how these factors influenced which surgeons they referred patients, as well as what changes in these factors would alter their referral patterns. RESULTS:The survey response rate was 15% (73/500), and 97% were endocrinologists. On average, 0 to 5 patients/week were referred for surgery. Most respondents (91.8%) felt that endocrinologists should decide which surgeon to refer. General surgery was the preferred surgeon specialty (43.7%), and endocrine surgery was the preferred subspecialty (70.8%). The factors most often cited as very important in referral to a surgeon included surgeon outcome/complications (71%), familiarity with surgeon (65%), surgeon's communication with referring physician (61%), and surgeon volume (59%). The factors most often cited as likely to change physician referral patterns included patient satisfaction (62%), complication rates (57%), surgeon outcomes (54%), and surgeon volume (50%). The factors most often cited as unlikely to change referral patterns included new surgeon availability (70%) and hospital/surgeon advertising (58%). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Referring physicians want experienced endocrine surgeons with high operative volumes and good outcomes whom they are familiar with. The promotion of referral to high-volume surgeons requires communication, good outcomes, and satisfied patients.