Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION:The current standard of care for children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) involves using ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) to promote growth; however, the precise formulation to achieve optimal recovery remains unclear. Emerging research suggests that alternative RUTF formulations may be more effective in correcting SAM-related complications such as anaemia and iron deficiency. This systematic review commissioned by the WHO aims to synthesise the most recent research on the iron content in RUTF and related products in the community-based treatment of uncomplicated severe malnutrition in children aged 6 months and older. METHODS AND ANALYSIS:We will search multiple electronic databases. We will include randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies with a control arm. The intervention group will be infants who received RUTF treatments other than the current recommended guidelines set forth by the WHO. The comparison group is children receiving RUTF containing iron at the current WHO-recommended level of 1.9 mg/100 kcal (10-14 mg/100 g). The primary outcomes of interest include blood haemoglobin concentration, any anaemia, severe anaemia, iron-deficiency anaemia, recovery from SAM and any adverse outcomes. We will use meta-analysis to pool findings if sufficient homogeneity exists among included studies. The risk of bias in studies will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias-2. We will use the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation(GRADE) approach to examine the overall certainty of evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:This is a systematic review and will not involve direct contact with human subjects. The findings of this review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will guide the WHO's recommendation on the optimal iron content in RUTFs for the treatment of SAM in children aged 6-59 months.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:Conventional culture can be insensitive for the detection of rare infections and for the detection of common infections in the setting of recent antibiotic usage. Patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) with suspected peritonitis have a significant proportion of negative conventional cultures. This study examines the utility of metagenomic sequencing of peritoneal effluent cell-free DNA (cfDNA) for evaluating the peritoneal effluent in PD patients with and without peritonitis. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:We prospectively characterized cfDNA in 68 peritoneal effluent samples obtained from 33 patients receiving PD at a single center from September 2016 to July 2018. OUTCOMES/RESULTS:Peritoneal effluent, microbial, and human cfDNA characteristics were evaluated in culture-confirmed peritonitis and culture-negative peritonitis. ANALYTICAL APPROACH/METHODS:Descriptive statistics were analyzed and microbial cfDNA was detected in culture-confirmed peritonitis and culture-negative peritonitis. RESULTS:Metagenomic sequencing of cfDNA was able to detect and identify bacterial, viral, and eukaryotic pathogens in the peritoneal effluent from PD patients with culture-confirmed peritonitis, as well as patients with recent antibiotic usage and in cases of culture-negative peritonitis. LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Parallel cultures were not obtained in all the peritoneal effluent specimens. CONCLUSIONS:Metagenomic cfDNA sequencing of the peritoneal effluent can identify pathogens in PD patients with peritonitis, including culture-negative peritonitis.

Urinary tract infections are one of the most common infections in humans. Here we tested the utility of urinary cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to comprehensively monitor host and pathogen dynamics in bacterial and viral urinary tract infections. We isolated cfDNA from 141 urine samples from a cohort of 82 kidney transplant recipients and performed next-generation sequencing. We found that urinary cfDNA is highly informative about bacterial and viral composition of the microbiome, antimicrobial susceptibility, bacterial growth dynamics, kidney allograft injury, and host response to infection. These different layers of information are accessible from a single assay and individually agree with corresponding clinical tests based on quantitative PCR, conventional bacterial culture, and urinalysis. In addition, cfDNA reveals the frequent occurrence of pathologies that remain undiagnosed with conventional diagnostic protocols. Our work identifies urinary cfDNA as a highly versatile analyte to monitor infections of the urinary tract.