Faculty Bibliography

Here we explore inhibitory circuits at the thalamocortical stage of processing in layer 4 of the cat's visual cortex, focusing on the anatomy and physiology of the interneurons themselves. Our immediate aim was to explore the inhibitory mechanisms that contribute to orientation selectivity, perhaps the most dramatic response property to emerge across the thalamocortical synapse. The broader goal was to understand how inhibitory circuits operate. Using whole-cell recording in cats in vivo, we found that layer 4 contains two populations of inhibitory cells defined by receptive field class--simple and complex. The simple cells were selective for stimulus orientation, whereas the complex cells were not. Our observations help to explain how neurons become sensitive to stimulus orientation and maintain that selectivity as stimulus contrast changes. Overall, the work suggests that different sources of inhibition, either selective for specific features or broadly tuned, interact to provide appropriate representations of elements within the environment.

Each stage of the striate cortical circuit extracts novel information about the visual environment. We asked if this analytic process reflected laminar variations in synaptic physiology by making whole-cell recording with dye-filled electrodes from the cat's visual cortex and thalamus; the stimuli were flashed spots. Thalamic afferents terminate in layer 4, which contains two types of cell, simple and complex, distinguished by the spatial structure of the receptive field. Previously, we had found that the postsynaptic and spike responses of simple cells reliably followed the time course of flash-evoked thalamic activity. Here we report that complex cells in layer 4 (or cells intermediate between simple and complex) similarly reprised thalamic activity (response/trial, 99 +/- 1.9 %; response duration 159 +/- 57 ms; latency 25 +/- 4 ms; average +/- standard deviation; n = 7). Thus, all cells in layer 4 share a common synaptic physiology that allows secure integration of thalamic input. By contrast, at the second cortical stage (layer 2+3), where layer 4 directs its output, postsynaptic responses did not track simple patterns of antecedent activity. Typical responses to the static stimulus were intermittent and brief (response/trial, 31 +/- 40 %; response duration 72 +/- 60 ms, latency 39 +/- 7 ms; n = 11). Only richer stimuli like those including motion evoked reliable responses. All told, the second level of cortical processing differs markedly from the first. At that later stage, ascending information seems strongly gated by connections between cortical neurons. Inputs must be combined in newly specified patterns to influence intracortical stages of processing.