Faculty Bibliography

Trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit are a unique population with high mortality. This study aims to identify characteristics predicting the likelihood of progressing to palliative management often referred to as comfort care measures, thus enabling the trauma team to broach end-of-life decisions earlier in these patients' care. This is a retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected New York State Trauma Registry database for a single Level I trauma center for patients admitted from 2008 to 2015. During this time, a total of 13,662 patients were admitted to the trauma service and there were 827 deaths, resulting in a crude annual mortality rate of approximately 6 per cent. Approximately one-half of the total mortalities, 404 of 827 (48.9%), were ultimately designated as comfort care. Univariate analysis identified the following risk factors for comfort care designation: advanced age, multiple comorbidities, blunt trauma mechanism, traumatic brain injury, and admission location. Multivariate analysis confirmed advanced age and traumatic brain injury. Subgroup analysis also identified advanced directives, pre-existing dementia, and bleeding disorders as significant associations with comfort care designation. The identification of factors predicting comfort care will result in improved care planning and resource utilization.

OBJECTIVE:Young patients are at low risk for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS); however, many of these patients still enter a "rule-out ACS" pathway and receive stress testing. We hypothesized that stress testing in patients younger than 40 years without known coronary disease will not identify patients at high risk for 30-day adverse cardiovascular events. METHODS:We conducted a cohort study of patients younger than 40 years evaluated in the emergency department for potential ACS. Patients were excluded if they used cocaine, had known cardiac disease, or had an abnormal electrocardiogram. Patients were followed up in-house; follow-up was performed by direct telephone contact and medical record review. The main outcome was a composite of death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and revascularization at 30 days. Comparisons between patients with and without stress testing were done using χ2 or t test, as appropriate; 95% confidence intervals were reported for the main outcomes. RESULTS:Of 8816 patient visits, 1144 patients met inclusion criteria. Within 30 days, 82 patients (7.2%) received stress testing, 2 of whom led to cardiac catheterization. Death (n=2), AMI (n=3), and revascularization (n=1) were not different between patients who did and did not receive stress testing (2.4% [0.2%-8.5%] vs 0.4% [0.1%-1.0%]). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The 30-day cardiovascular complication rate is not different between young patients without known heart disease who do and do not receive stress testing when they present with symptoms of a potential ACS. Testing of young patients at low risk for disease should be reconsidered.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Advancing developments of endovascular approaches and subspecialty vascular care have significantly diminished general surgery residents' exposure to essential vascular techniques in trauma. This has led to a deficiency in preparedness among residency graduates in handling basic vascular emergencies. The Open Surgical Simulation System (OS3) is a high-fidelity trauma surgery model that allows for skill acquisition through hands-on practice. METHODS:We evaluated the effect of a new OS3 surgical skills curriculum on residents' self-assessed knowledge, technical skills, and confidence using precourse and postcourse surveys with 5-point Likert scales. Procedures performed included resuscitative thoracotomy, exploratory laparotomy, splenectomy, liver trauma management, small bowel resection, and retroperitoneal exploration. Determinants of skill self-assessments, perceived challenges, and course utility for skill acquisition were analyzed using linear regression modeling. RESULTS:One hundred eighty-three trainees completed the simulation and surveys. Each increasing postgraduate year level above 2 was associated with increases in self-assessment of knowledge, skills, and experience (P < 0.001); prior Advanced Trauma Operative Management and Advanced Surgical Skills for Exposure in Trauma course participation was not. Vascular shunt insertion, aortic crossclamp, and vascular anastomosis consistently ranked among the most challenging procedures regardless of training levels. Overall, the OS3 simulation significantly increased trainees' confidence in performing resuscitative thoracotomy, exploratory laparotomy, splenectomy, liver trauma management, retroperitoneal exploration, and small bowel resection (P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS:When self-assessing technical skills in trauma, almost half of surveyed general surgery trainees describe significant difficulty with essential vascular procedures such as shunting and aortic crossclamping. The OS3 may allow for consistent and readily reproducible training in these and other procedures to alleviate this confidence gap.

Hepatobiliary emergencies typically present with a constellation of different symptoms including abdominal pain, fevers, nausea, vomiting, jaundice, coagulopathy, and in some instances, encephalopathy. The differential can be broad and may include infectious, inflammatory, and even iatrogenic etiologies. Workup with appropriate lab and imaging studies can help discern between different pathologies and thus guide their management. Interventions can range broadly from conservative management with medical therapy to endoscopic options or surgery. This article explores the diagnostic workup and evaluation as well as the current therapeutic interventions for a variety of these nontraumatic hepatobiliary emergencies based on the most current literature.

Ultrasonography is increasingly applied in the critical care setting. With advancements in technology, ultrasonography has become easier to use, with smaller machines, and more fundamental to patient assessment. Ultrasonography is a hands-on tool that brings real-time, dynamic information to the bedside. Patients in the critical care setting often have unstable hemodynamics or a tenuous respiratory status; thus, the use of ultrasonography to augment the assessment greatly improves patient safety. This article explores how to differentiate the etiology of shock with the adjunct of critical care echocardiography. In addition, the article examines how various ultrasonography techniques can be used to diagnose other life-threatening cardiac conditions, such as pulmonary embolism or cardiac tamponade, and the role of echocardiography in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Critical care providers can add echocardiography and the information it provides to their repertoire to improve diagnosis, treatment, and patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:  The authors assessed whether there was a sex disparity in testing of patients after coronary computerized tomographic angiography (CTA) was performed for emergency department (ED) patients with potential acute coronary syndromes (ACS). In theory, once coronary anatomy has been determined, any disparity in subsequent workup should not be the result of differences in presentation. METHODS:  This was a prospective cohort study of ED patients who presented with potential ACS and received coronary CTAs at a university hospital. Demographics, history, cardiac risk factors, follow-up testing, and procedures were recorded. Follow-up at 30 days was obtained by structured record review and telephone contact. Patients were stratified by sex and coronary CTA results (max stenosis: none, 1% to 24%, 25% to 49%, 50% to 69%, and ≥70%). Main outcome was the relative risk (RR) of a male receiving a stress test or catheterization within 30 days, stratified by categories of percent maximal stenosis. RESULTS:  A total of 1,144 patients received coronary CTAs (mean ± SD age = 47.8 ± 8.7 years), 55% were female, and 64% were black or African American. Overall, 161 patients received follow-up testing within 30 days, 113 during their index visit. Men were more likely to receive further testing (RR = 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14 to 1.99) compared to women. However, when stratified by percentage of stenosis, men were not more likely to receive further testing within 30 days after coronary CTA compared to women (RR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.68 to 1.91). In multivariable modeling for risk of further testing, stenosis remained significant (adjusted relative risk [aRR] = 1.51; 95% CI = 1.19 to 1.91), while male sex, age, race, and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score were not. CONCLUSIONS:  Male patients with potential ACS who receive a coronary CTA as a part of their ED evaluation were no more likely than female patients to receive further testing within 30 days.