Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:The aims of this pilot study were to determine whether (1) a modified version of the Robinson-Ho Skin Type Color Bar would identify early, subtle skin tone variations in patients with dark skin tones because of injury, and (2) if the tool was reliable between clinicians. METHODS:This was a prospective, observational cohort study in a surgical intensive care/acute care unit located in an urban, academic hospital. Patients who were ≥18 years old without a skin injury, but with a confirmed dark skin tone based on the modified Robinson-Ho Skin Type Color Bar, were included in the pilot study. RESULTS:The first aim could not be supported because of the lack of patients who developed subtle skin tone changes indicative of a skin injury. Two patients developed a skin injury (deep tissue pressure injury, trauma). These wounds did not manifest as subtle changes, therefore rendering the tool ineffective for these cases. The second aim was supported as inter-rater reliability of the Robinson-Ho Skin Type Color Bar showed moderate agreement between multiple raters. It was also noted that race/ethnicity was not an objective marker for determining skin tone per the tool. CONCLUSIONS:Although the modified Robinson-Ho Skin Type Color Bar was not an effective method to detect subtle skin tone changes indicative of injury because of the 2 wounds that did occur, it was reliable to use between multiple users. The tool also served as an objective marker for determining baseline skin tone.

BACKGROUND:Fostering a culture of inquiry within an academic health system can be both challenging and rewarding. Having a strategic approach can help navigate these complexities. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this program evaluation is to describe the steps taken to develop, implement, and sustain a nursing science fellowship (NSF) in an academic health system. METHODS:Grounded by a nursing strategic map, the NSF was established under the leadership of a steering committee. Key components of the NSF, including eligibility guidelines, curriculum development, outcome measurements, and faculty and mentor selection, were created over a three-month period. The first cohort of fellows began the 13-month program in January 2023. Fellows attended monthly lectures and were provided with individualized mentorship to advance either an evidence-based practice (EBP) or research project. Prior to beginning the curriculum, fellows were given a research/EBP textbook. A survey to determine their confidence in nursing science skills both before and after the program was administered to all fellows. RESULTS:Of the 11 inaugural fellows, eight completed the program. Four fellows conducted research studies, and four completed EBP projects. The results were disseminated through national presentations, posters, and peer-reviewed publications. Evaluations demonstrated significant improvements in the fellows' confidence in all measured nursing science skills and topics, with notable increases in navigating institutional review board submissions (148.54%), utilizing theoretical frameworks (86.92%), and critically appraising evidence (68.07%). A second cohort began the NSF program in September 2024, and a third will begin in 2026. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The NSF helped to sustain a culture of inquiry within the academic health system. This program highlights the critical role of strategic planning and stakeholder engagement in advancing a culture of inquiry. The NSF fosters professional curiosity and aligns with the tenets of the American Nurses Credentialing Center Magnet model by advancing nursing science. As health care evolves, programs like the NSF are essential for cultivating sustainable nursing research and EBP practices that drive professional growth and innovation and can lead to enhanced patient care.

OBJECTIVE:To review currently available devices on pressure injury (PI) early detection, summarize challenges and opportunities to clinical implementation, and propose evaluation standards for device categories. DATA SOURCES/METHODS:PubMed and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) databases. STUDY SELECTION/METHODS:Published in English from peer-reviewed journals with full text available. Excluded if opinion statements, lack of empirical data, or unrelated to project's objective. DATA EXTRACTION/METHODS:For both clinical device and research equipment: measurement mechanisms, measurement types, outcome/output, FDA classification, and indications for use. Addition data were extracted for clinical devices: instruction for use, end user, order requirement, and billable code. DATA SYNTHESIS/RESULTS:The 4 clinical devices are ultrasound, long-wave infrared thermography, subepidermal moisture assessment, and nearinfrared spectroscopy. The 3 research devices are laser Doppler flowmetry, laser speckle contrast imaging, and colorimetry. CONCLUSIONS:The measurement mechanisms of all devices are unique and different from each other. One commonality is that they could measure the nonvisual signs of PI (eg, inflammation, edema, ischemia, and hypoxia) except colorimeter. Some clinical devices are promising to assist with early identification of PIs, especially in individuals with dark skin tones. Currently, there is no reimbursement available for early detection of PI. Current evidence did not support replacing the standard skin assessment of visual inspection and palpation with the devices reviewed, rather using validated devices to augment the current practice standard. This is especially recommended for individuals identified as high risk for a PI on admission to a facility.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Nurses are one of the largest user groups of the electronic health record (EHR) system, relying on its tools to support patient care and nursing workflows. Recent studies suggested that the redesign of nursing documentation may reduce the time spent in the EHR system and improve nurse satisfaction. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:We aimed to assess nurses' perceptions of the redesigned EHR, evaluate the impact of documentation interventions, and identify future improvement needs. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Guided by the American Nursing Informatics Association's Six Domains of Burden conceptual framework, this multimethod project combined both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Registered nurses across the academic health system were recruited via email invitations to participate in focus group discussions. The focus groups were conducted via a web conference and ranged from 60 to 90 minutes in duration. The focus group discussions were transcribed and analyzed through thematic analysis. The EHR vendor's time data were used to analyze nurses' time spent in documentation. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:In total, 20 registered nurses participated in the focus group discussions, and 17 nurses completed the demographic survey; 88% (15/17) of participants had ≥3 years of EHR experience at the academic health system, and 53% (9/17) self-reported being competent in the EHR system. The following six themes emerged: positive feedback, usability and workflow opportunities, nuisance, training and education, communication, and time spent in the system. EHR vendor time data revealed that the time spent in flowsheets averaged 31.11% per 12-hour shift. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Overall, participants reported a positive experience and that the EHR supported patient care. There are opportunities to further reduce redundancies in documentation and implement programs that support continuous learning about EHR and health technology tools. Specific suggestions include optimizing the oral health assessment tool. Analyzing frontline nursing perspectives in the redesign of EHR workflows is imperative for identifying interventions that support nurses' satisfaction with the EHR.

GENERAL PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To review risk factors for the development of medical device-related and immobility-related pressure injuries in hospitalized pediatric patients. TARGET AUDIENCE/BACKGROUND:This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and registered nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES/OBJECTIVE:After participating in this educational activity, the participant will be better able to:1. Describe trends in pressure injuries (PIs) for hospitalized pediatric patients as summarized in current literature.2. Identify risk factors predictive of medical device-related and immobility-related PIs in hospitalized pediatric patients.3. Summarize the methodology used to understand risk factors for developing PIs in the hospitalized pediatric patient population.

GENERAL PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To review the role of nutrition and high-quality dietary protein intake in creating healthy granulation tissue and optimize wound healing in patients with chronic wounds. TARGET AUDIENCE/BACKGROUND:This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and registered nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES/OBJECTIVE:After participating in this educational activity, the participant will:1. Summarize the structure and composition of proteins. 2. Specify the role of proteins in generating healthy granulation tissue and wound healing. 3. Explain the physiologic pathways involved in the wound healing process. 4. Describe evidence-based interventions to support nutrition in wound healing.

BACKGROUND:Current pediatric pressure injury (PI) prevention measures are based on risk factors related to PI development in adults. Children offer a unique concern for PI development because their bodies are still developing, and their skin responds differently to external pressure. OBJECTIVE:To explore risk factors for the development of full-thickness PIs in children aged 21 weeks' gestation to 21 years. METHODS:This retrospective, observational, correlational study included 799 hospitalized children who developed a PI. The pediatric and adult PI risk factors used in the study were identified from the International Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment Guideline. A stepwise multivariate logistic regression model was used. RESULTS:Multivariate analyses revealed that risk factors for predicting a full-thickness PI varied by age. For children aged 38 weeks to 12 months, risk factors included tissue perfusion and oxygenation: generalized edema, conditions of the OR, and nutrition deficits. For children aged 1 to 7 years, fragile skin status was a risk factor. For youth aged 8 to 21 years, the two risk factors were tissue perfusion and oxygenation: decreased oxygenation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Across the total sample, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, tissue perfusion and oxygenation: decreased oxygenation and malnutrition were risk factors for predicting a full-thickness PI. CONCLUSIONS:Full-thickness PI risk factors differ among the ages of pediatric patients.

Pressure injuries are a common chronic wound in the older adult. Care of pressure injuries is an interprofessional effort and involves physicians, nurses, registered dieticians, rehabilitation therapists, and surgical subspecialties. Numerous treatment modalities exist but have varying evidence to substantiate their efficacy. All primary and other care providers, particularly geriatricians, need to be aware of current evidence-based prevention and treatment standards. When healing is not expected, palliative care should be considered to avoid futile procedures and preserve dignity and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE:To examine the clinical risk factors of perioperative pressure injury (PrI) in older adults with a hip fracture, including preoperative chronic comorbidities and postoperative complications. METHODS:In this retrospective study, the authors queried the PearlDiver Patient Records database between January 2011 and January 2020. Data from 54,194 patients without preexisting PrI were included for analyses. Patients were separated into two groups: (1) one or more perioperative PrI and (2) no PrI. Clinical factors as outcome variables include 21 comorbidities and 10 complications. RESULTS:Univariate analyses were computed to compare the variables between groups, and two logistic regression models were developed to find comorbidity predictors and complication predictors. Of all patients, 1,362 (2.5%) developed one or more perioperative PrI. Patients with perioperative PrIs were more likely to be older men. One-year mortality for patients with perioperative PrI was 2.5 times that of patients without PrI. The regression models showed that predictors of perioperative PrI are malnutrition, hypoalbuminemia, frailty, peripheral vascular disease, dementia, urinary tract infection, perioperative red blood cell transfusion, and atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS:Screening for these comorbidities and complications may assist in determining the risk of PrI in older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery. Determining PrI risk enables the appropriate prevention strategies to be applied perioperatively.