Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:The advent of the Chicago Classification for esophageal motility disorders allowed for clinically reproducible subgrouping of patients with achalasia based on manometric phenotype. However, there are limited data with regards to racial variation using high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM). The aim of our study was to evaluate the racial differences in patients with achalasia diagnosed with HREM using the Chicago Classification. We evaluated the clinical presentation, treatment decisions and outcomes between blacks and non-blacks with achalasia to identify potential racial disparities. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients referred for HREM at a single tertiary referral center from June 2008 through October 2012. All patients diagnosed with achalasia on HREM according to the Chicago Classification were included. Demographic, clinical and manometric data were abstracted. All studies interpreted before the Chicago Classification was in widespread use were reanalyzed. Race was defined as black or non-black. Patients who had missing data were excluded. Proportions were compared using chi-squared analysis and means were compared using the Student's t-test. RESULTS:A total of 1,268 patients underwent HREM during the study period, and 105 (8.3%) were manometrically diagnosed with achalasia (53% female, mean age: 53.8 ± 17.0 years) and also met the aforementioned inclusion and exclusion criteria. A higher percentage of women presented with achalasia in blacks as compared to whites or other races (P < 0.001). Non-blacks were more likely to present with reflux than blacks (P = 0.01), while blacks were more likely to be treated on the inpatient service than non-blacks (P < 0.001). There were no other significant differences noted in clinical presentation, treatment decisions and treatment outcomes among blacks and non-blacks. CONCLUSIONS:Our study highlights possible racial differences between blacks and non-blacks, including a higher proportion of black women diagnosed with achalasia and most blacks presenting with dysphagia. There is possibly a meaningful interaction of race and sex in the development of achalasia that might represent genetic differences in its pathophysiology. Further prospective studies are required to identify such differences.

BACKGROUND:Constipation and fecal incontinence (FI) are common and are often evaluated with anorectal manometry. Three-dimensional high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) is a promising technology; however, implementation has been limited by lack of metrics and unclear clinical utility. AIM:To investigate the diagnostic utility of 3D HRAM compared to 2D HRAM. METHODS:Three-dimensional HRAM studies performed from April 2012 to October 2013 were identified and re-interpreted by two blinded investigators examining 3D function. Disagreements were resolved by a third investigator. Puborectalis (PR) visualization, focal defects, and dyssynergy were reported. Differences between groups were analyzed with Fisher's exact test. Discordance was analyzed with McNemar Chi-square test. RESULTS:Two hundred and twenty-one 3D HRAM studies were identified. Mean age and BMI were 52.2 ± 17.4 and 27.1 ± 7.5 years (81% female, 74% white). Most common indications for 3D HRAM were constipation (65%) and FI (28%). PR function was visualized in 81% (rest), 97% (squeeze), and 73% (strain). PR was visualized less often at rest in FI than constipation (68 vs. 85%, p = 0.007). Defects were identified twice as often in FI than constipation (19 vs. 10%, p = 0.113). Twenty-nine defects (86% anterior) were visualized on 3D HRAM. Inter-reader agreement was moderate for PR function (κ = 0.471), but fair for focal defects (κ = 0.304). CONCLUSIONS:PR function and focal defects can be visualized on 3D-HRAM with added diagnostic benefit compared to 2D. Fair inter-reader agreement for focal defects highlights the need for quantitative metrics.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, immune-mediated disease resulting in symptoms of esophageal dysmotility. Abnormalities include dysphagia, food impaction and reflux. Although men appear to comprise a majority of the EoE population, few studies have directly assessed gender-associated clinical differences. The aim of this study is to identify the effect of gender on the initial clinical presentation of adult-onset EoE patients. We reviewed our electronic medical record database from January 2008 to December 2011 for adults diagnosed with EoE per the 2011 updated consensus guidelines. Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, endoscopy findings and complications were recorded. Proportions were compared using chi-squared analysis, and means were compared using the Student's t-test. A total of 162 patients met the inclusion criteria and 71 (44%) were women. Women were more likely to report chest pain (P = 0.03) and heartburn (P = 0.06), whereas men more commonly reported dysphagia (P = 0.04) and a history of food impaction (P = 0.05). Endoscopic findings were similar between groups. No patients suffered esophageal perforations. These data suggest that men report more fibrostenotic symptoms and women report more inflammatory symptoms at the time of diagnosis. There was no difference in endoscopic findings between genders. This is one of the only reviews comparing differences in clinical presentation, endoscopic findings and complications between gender for EoE. The current recommended guidelines state that any patient with symptoms of esophageal dysfunction should be biopsied for EoE. Our findings support biopsying patients with typical and atypical symptoms of dysmotility including heartburn and chest pain.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Medical treatment options for gastroparesis are limited. Data from studies of botulinum toxin and surgical pyloroplasty suggest that disruption of the pylorus can result in symptomatic improvement in some patients with refractory gastroparetic symptoms. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical response to transpyloric stent (TPS) placement in patients with gastroparetic symptoms refractory to standard therapy. METHODS: Patients with gastroparesis refractory to medical treatment were referred for TPS placement for salvage therapy. Self-reported symptom improvement, stent migration rate, and pre- and post-stent gastric-emptying study results were collected. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients with refractory gastroparesis underwent 48 TPS procedures. Of these, 25 of 48 (52.1%) were performed in patients admitted to the hospital with intractable gastroparetic symptoms. Successful stent placement in the desired location across the pylorus (technical success) was achieved during 47 procedures (98%). Most (n = 24) stents were anchored to the gastric wall by using endoscopic suturing with a mean number of sutures of 2 (range 1-3) per procedure. Clinical response was observed in 75% of patients, and all inpatients were successfully discharged. Clinical success in patients with the predominant symptoms of nausea and vomiting was higher than in those patients with a predominant symptom of pain (79% vs 21%, P = .12). A repeat gastric-emptying study was performed in 16 patients, and the mean 4-hour gastric emptying normalized in 6 patients and significantly improved in 5 patients. Stent migration was least common (48%) when stents were sutured. CONCLUSION: TPS placement is a feasible novel endoscopic treatment modality for gastroparesis and improves both symptoms and gastric emptying in patients who are refractory to medical treatment, especially those with nausea and vomiting. TPS placement may be considered as salvage therapy for inpatients with intractable symptoms or potentially as a method to select patients who may respond to more permanent therapies directed at the pylorus.

BACKGROUND:Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a growing cause of dysphagia. Current therapies include dietary manipulation, steroids and biological drugs. AIM/OBJECTIVE:To perform a systematic review and summarise the effect of different medical interventions on EoE. METHODS:Two reviewers searched Pubmed and Embase for studies on treatment for EoE. We included randomised controlled trials (RCT) limited to pharmacological interventions. Two reviewers selected studies. Meta-analysis was done using random effects model to estimate odds ratio (OR). Heterogeneity was determined by Cochran's Q statistic and I(2) . RESULTS:Seventeen references met our inclusion criteria. Eleven RCTs involving 455 participants were included in the meta-analysis. 325 participants were evaluated for symptomatic improvement and 330 were evaluated for histological remission. Symptomatic improvement with topical steroids (7 studies, 250 participants) compared to the control group (placebo or PPI) was noted (OR: 3.03, 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.57-5.87). Histological remission was also noted in nine studies involving 330 participants (OR: 13.66, 95% CI: 2.65-70.34) comparing topical steroids to a control (placebo or PPI). There was no difference between anti-IL-5 drugs and placebo in terms of symptomatic improvement (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.34-1.42). CONCLUSIONS:Topical steroids induce significant symptomatic and histological remission, and should be considered as a first line treatment. Anti-IL-5 therapy has a minor effect on eosinophilic oesophagitis. Future research in eosinophilic oesophagitis should standardise methodology according to published guidelines to improve quality and allow direct comparison between therapies.

BACKGROUND:Multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH testing (MII-pH) allows for the detection of acid and non-acid reflux, thus, increasing yield over pH testing. Limited data exist on how physicians use test results in practice. AIM/OBJECTIVE:The aim of our study was to evaluate the influence of MII-pH testing on patient care. METHODS:We reviewed records of patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease who underwent MII-pH testing. Management decisions evaluated included changes in prescribed medications and surgical consultation for anti-reflux surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson Chi square test, and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS:MII-pH testing resulted in a medication change in 41% of patients, surgical consultation in 19.7%, and anti-reflux surgery in 11.1%. In patients who were not on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, MII-pH results were most useful in the decision to start a PPI. On PPI therapy, results were more often used to decide whether to increase (32.3%) or switch the PPI (23.5%) in patients with continued acid reflux. Results were most useful to stop the PPI in normal studies (11.1%). More patients with non-acid reflux (14.3%) and normal results (19.7%) were started on a neuromodulator compared to other diagnoses. The MII-pH result was most useful in the decision to start baclofen or bethanecol when the patient was found to have non-acid reflux (25%). Patients with an abnormal MII-pH or abnormal MII alone were more likely to be referred to surgery (OR 19.5, p < 0.001; OR 19.77, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:MII-pH testing impacted medical or surgical management in over half the patients tested.

Solitary fibrous tumors are unusual spindle cell neoplasms that uncommonly originate from the kidney. We report a case of a 43-year old male who presented with acute recurrent pancreatitis secondary to a mass in the head of the pancreas. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was performed. Cytology revealed solitary fibrous tumor of the kidney. This is the first reported case of solitary fibrous tumor metastasizing to the pancreas and presenting as acute recurrent pancreatitis.