Faculty Bibliography

The field of additive manufacturing, 3D printing (3DP), has experienced an exponential growth over the past four decades, in part due to increased accessibility. Developments including computer-aided design and manufacturing, incorporation of more versatile materials, and improved printing techniques/equipment have stimulated growth of 3DP technologies within various industries, but most specifically the medical field. Alternatives to metals including ceramics and polymers have been garnering popularity due to their resorbable properties and physiologic similarity to extracellular matrix. 3DP has the capacity to utilize an assortment of materials and printing techniques for a multitude of indications, each with their own associated benefits. Within the field of medicine, advances in medical imaging have facilitated the integration of 3DP. In particular, the field of orthopedics has been one of the earliest medical specialties to implement 3DP. Current indications include education for patients, providers, and trainees, in addition to surgical planning. Moreover, further possibilities within orthopedic surgery continue to be explored, including the development of patient-specific implants. This review aims to highlight the use of current 3DP technology and materials by the orthopedic community, and includes comments on current trends and future direction(s) within the field.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Operating room (OR) efficiency has an impact on surgeon productivity and patient experience. Accuracy of case duration estimation is important to optimize OR efficiency. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with inaccurate case time estimates in outpatient hand surgery. A better understanding of these findings may help to improve OR efficiency and scheduling. METHODS:All outpatient hand surgical cases from 2018 to 2019 were reviewed. Poorly-estimated cases (i.e., poor scheduling accuracy) were defined as those cases where the actual operative time differed from the predicted time by >50% (either quicker by >50% or slower by >50% than the predicted time). The percentages of poorly-estimated cases were analyzed, categorized, and compared by surgeon, procedure type, and scheduled case length. RESULTS:A total of 6,620 cases were identified. Of 1,107 (16.7%) cases with poorly estimated case durations, 75.2% were underestimated. There was no difference in the likelihood of poor estimation related to start time. Well-estimated cases tended to have longer scheduled case duration, but shorter realized case duration and surgical time. Our systems analysis identified specific surgeons and procedures as predictable outliers. Cases scheduled for 15-30 minutes frequently were inaccurate, whereas cases scheduled for 30-45 and 106-120 minutes had accurate estimates. CONCLUSIONS:The accuracy of case time estimations in a standard outpatient hand surgery practice is highly variable. Nearly one-fifth of outpatient hand surgery case durations are poorly estimated, and inaccurate case time estimation can be predicted based on surgeon, procedure type, and case time. CLINICAL RELEVANCE/CONCLUSIONS:Maximizing OR efficiency should be a priority for surgeons and hospital systems. With multiple surgeries done per day, the efficiency of the OR has an impact on surgeon productivity and patient experience.

BACKGROUND:Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has redefined the frontiers of plastic and reconstructive surgery. At the cutting edge of this evolving paradigm, we present the first successful combined full face and bilateral hand transplant (FT-BHT). METHODS:A 21-year-old man with sequelae of an 80% total body surface area burn injury sustained following a motor vehicle accident presented for evaluation. The injury included full face and bilateral upper extremity composite tissue defects, resulting in reduced quality of life and loss of independence. Multidisciplinary evaluation confirmed eligibility for combined FT-BHT. The operative approach was validated through 11 cadaveric rehearsals utilizing computerized surgical planning. Institutional review board and organ procurement organization approvals were obtained. The recipient, his caregiver, and the donor family consented to the procedure. RESULTS:Combined full face (eyelids, ears, nose, lips, and skeletal subunits) and bilateral hand transplantation (forearm level) was performed over 23 hours on August 12-13th, 2020. Triple induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy and infection prophylaxis were administered. Plasmapheresis was necessary postoperatively. Minor revisions were performed over seven subsequent operations, including five left upper extremity, seven right upper extremity, and seven facial secondary procedures. At eight months, the patient is approaching functional independence and remains free of acute rejection. He has significantly improved range of motion, motor power, and sensation of the face and hand allografts. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Combined FT-BHT is feasible. This is the most comprehensive VCA procedure successfully performed to date, marking a new milestone in plastic and reconstructive surgery for patients with otherwise irremediable injuries.

Nonthumb metacarpal (NTMC) fractures are common in the incarcerated and the underinsured civilian populations. However, certain social challenges contribute to high rates of follow-up noncompliance and complications in these unique populations. We conducted a retrospective review of the treatments, outcomes, and complications in the incarcerated and civilian patient population who were treated at a tertiary public hospital for NTMC fractures. Even though incarcerated patients were more likely than their civilian counterparts to undergo operative interventions, both populations showed similar complication profiles as well as low rates of treatment compliance and follow-up. This article affirms that incarcerated individuals do not receive inferior care compared with civilians, and both the incarcerated and underinsured civilians would benefit from careful consideration of treatment algorithms and additional access to hand therapy.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The purpose of this study was to compare the demographic differences of the most common peripheral nerve compressions in the upper extremity-carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), ulnar nerve compression (UNC) at the elbow, combined CTS and UNC, radial tunnel syndrome (RTS), and posterior interosseous nerve syndrome (PINS)-as a means to better understand the etiologies of each. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:< .05). RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:< .001). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:The demographics of patients with various compressive neuropathies were not homogeneous, suggesting different etiologies.

Background:Patients with psychiatric comorbidities represent a significant subset of those sustaining pilon fractures. The purpose of this study is to examine the association of psychiatric comorbidities (PC) in patients with pilon fractures and clinical outcomes. Methods:A multi-institution, retrospective review was conducted. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were skeletally mature patients with a tibia pilon fracture (OTA Type 43B/C) who underwent definitive fracture fixation utilizing open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with a minimum of 24 weeks of follow-up. Patients were stratified into two groups for comparison: PC group and no PC group. Results:There were 103 patients with pilon fractures that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria of this study. Of these patients, 22 (21.4%) had at least one psychiatric comorbidity (PC) and 81 (78.6%) did not have psychiatric comorbidities (no PC). There was a higher percentage of female patients (PC: 59.1% vs no PC: 25.9%, p=0.0.005), smokers (PC: 40.9% vs no PC: 16.0%, p=0.02), and drug users (PC: 22.7% vs no PC: 8.6%, p=0.08) amongst PC patients. Fracture comminution (PC: 54.5% vs no PC: 32.1%, p=0.05) occurred more frequently in PC patients. The PC group had a higher incidence of weightbearing noncompliance (22.7% vs 7.5%, p=0.04) and reoperation (PC: 54.5% vs no PC: 29.6%, p=0.03). Conclusion:.

Endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR) continues to rise in popularity as a treatment option for carpal tunnel syndrome. Numerous variations in technique and instrumentation currently exist, broadly classified into two-portal and single-portal techniques with antegrade and retrograde designs. ECTR is equally effective as open carpal tunnel release for alleviating symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome with no differences in long-term outcomes. ECTR has an increased risk of transient nerve injury, whereas open carpal tunnel release has an increased risk of wound and scar complications. ECTR has higher direct costs but is associated with earlier return to work. ECTR is a safe and effective approach to carpal tunnel release in the hands of experienced surgeons.

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a procedure in which amputated nerves are transferred to motor branches of functionally expendable muscles, which can then serve as "biological amplifiers" of neurologic information. It is a technique that was developed with the primary intent of improving myoelectric prosthesis control in high level upper extremity amputees. Over time, TMR has been shown to confer significant benefits in terms of both residual and phantom limb pain and as such has become a powerful tool in neuroma management in amputees and non-amputees. This review first discusses general principles of amputation management in the upper extremity, including the different types of prosthetics that are available for these patients. The history, rationale, and evolution of TMR will then be outlined, followed by several relevant surgical principles. Finally, the current evidence for and against TMR will be reviewed. Robust data on the functional benefits are still needed, and future studies will continue to clarify its role in both upper and lower extremity amputees.

The first digital replantation was performed over 50 years ago, and soon after surgeons in countries around the world were finding great success in their outcomes. The initial wave of success, however, has been followed by somewhat disappointing results in the United States in recent years. The steadily declining number of attempts at replantation and diminishing viability rates can be attributed to several factors, many of which can be addressed with centralization of care and the modification of our own indications and contraindications. While other regions of the world still enjoy good outcomes, the United States must make a concerted effort to improve their results for these devastating injuries.