Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:In patients with breast cancer, prone radiation therapy (RT) has been shown to reduce heart and lung dose. Though prone positioning is routinely used for whole breast RT, its use when treating the regional lymph nodes is not widespread. METHODS AND MATERIALS/METHODS:In this phase 1/2 trial for stage IB-IIA breast cancer treated with lumpectomy or mastectomy, patients received 40.5 Gy in 15 fractions to the breast or chest wall and regional lymph nodes with an integrated tumor bed boost for lumpectomy patients. Primary endpoints were grade >2 acute toxicity and dosimetric feasibility. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of resimulation to improve dosimetry and late toxicity. Exploratory endpoints were local recurrence, disease-free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS:From 2009 to 2016, 97 patients were enrolled (68% lumpectomy and 32% mastectomy), among which 92 were treated in the prone position. Five patients were resimulated and treated supine. Among the prone-treated patients, there were no acute toxicities greater than grade 2. A total of 92%, 98%, and 89% met a planning target volume tumor V48 Gy ≥98%, breast V40.5 Gy ≥95%, and nodal V38.5 Gy ≥95%, respectively. All met the heart V5 Gy <5%, contralateral lung V5 Gy <15%, spinal cord dose maximum (Dmax) ≤37.5 Gy, esophagus V30 Gy <50%, and Dmax ≤40.5 Gy. Ninety-eight percent met the ipsilateral lung V10 Gy. Brachial plexus Dmax <42 Gy was met in 74% with a mean increase of 1.61 Gy (SD, 1.96 Gy) over the target. At a median follow-up of 8 years, grade 2 to 3 late toxicity was 23% for prone patients. There were 2 local recurrences (2%) and no chest wall or nodal recurrences. The 8-year distant recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 88% (95% CI, 81%-95%), 86% (95% CI, 78%-95%), and 91% (95% CI, 84%-98%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Toxicity was low, and outcomes were excellent in this prospective trial of prone hypofractionated nodal RT.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:The most common definitive treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is radical cystectomy. However, removing the bladder and surrounding organs poses risks of morbidity that can reduce quality of life, and raises the risk of death. Treatment strategies that preserve the organs can manage the local tumor and mitigate the risk of distant metastasis. Recent data have demonstrated promising outcomes in several bladder-preservation strategies. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:Bladder preservation with trimodality therapy (TMT), combining maximal transurethral resection of the bladder tumor, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy (RT), was often reserved for nonsurgical candidates for radical cystectomy. Recent meta-analyses show that outcomes of TMT and radical cystectomy are similar. More recent bladder-preservation approaches include combining targeted RT (MRI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), ICIs and chemotherapy, and selecting patients based on genomic biomarkers and clinical response to systemic therapies. These are all promising strategies that may circumvent the need for radical cystectomy. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS:MIBC is an aggressive disease with a high rate of systemic progression. Current management includes neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radical cystectomy with lymph node dissection. Novel alternative strategies, including TMT approaches, combinations with RT, chemotherapy, and/or ICIs, and genomic biomarkers, are in development to further advance bladder-preservation options for patients with MIBC.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:With transition from supine to prone position, tenting of the pectoralis major occurs, displacing the muscle from the chest wall and shifting the level I and II axillary spaces. For patients for whom we aim to treat the level I and II axillae using the prone technique, accurate delineation of these nodal regions is necessary. Although different consensus guidelines exist for delineation of nodal anatomy in supine position, to our knowledge, there are no contouring guidelines in the prone position that account for this change in nodal anatomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS/METHODS:The level I and II nodal contours from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) breast cancer supine atlas were adapted for prone position by 2 radiation oncologists and a breast radiologist based on anatomic changes observed from supine to prone positioning on preoperative diagnostic imaging. Forty-three patients from a single institution treated with prone high tangents from 2012 to 2018 were identified as representative cases to delineate the revised level I and II axillae on noncontrast computed tomography (CT) scans obtained during radiation simulation. The revised nodal contours were reviewed by an expanded expert multidisciplinary panel including breast radiologists, radiation oncologists, and surgical oncologists for consistency and reproducibility. RESULTS:Consensus was achieved among the panel in order to create modifications from the RTOG breast atlas for CT-based contouring of the level I and II axillae in prone position using bone, muscle, and skin as landmarks. This atlas provides representative examples and accompanying descriptions for the changes described to the caudal and anterior borders of level II and the anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral borders of level I. A step-by-step guide is provided for properly identifying the revised anterior border of the level I axilla. CONCLUSIONS:The adaptations to the RTOG breast cancer atlas for prone positioning will enable radiation oncologists to more accurately target the level I and II axillae when the axillae are targets in addition to the breast.