Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:These studies were undertaken to determine if fexapotide triflutate 2.5 mg transrectal injectable (FT) has significant long-term (LT) safety and efficacy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS:Two placebo controlled double-blind randomized parallel group trials with 995 BPH patients at 72 sites treated 3:2 FT:placebo, with open-label FT crossover (CO) re-injection in 2 trials n = 344 and long-term follow-up (LF) 2-6.75 years (mean 3.58 years, median 3.67 years; FT re-injection CO mean 4.27 years, median 4.42 years) were evaluated. 12 months post-treatment patients elected no further treatment, approved oral medications, FT, or interventional treatment. Primary endpoint variable was change in Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 months and at LF. CO primary co-endpoints were 3-year incidence of (1) surgery for BPH in FT treated CO patients versus patients crossed over to oral BPH medications and (2) surgery or acute urinary retention in FT-treated CO placebo patients versus placebo patients crossed over to oral BPH medications. 28 CO secondary endpoints assessed surgical and symptomatic outcomes in FT reinjected patients versus conventional BPH medication CO and control subgroups at 2 and 3 years. RESULTS:FT injection had no significant safety differences from placebo. LF IPSS change from baseline was higher in FT treated patients compared to placebo (median FT group improvement - 5.2 versus placebo - 3.0, p < 0.0001). LF incidence of AUR (1.08% p = 0.0058) and prostate cancer (PCa) (1.1% p = 0.0116) were both reduced in FT treated patients. LF incidence of intervention for BPH was reduced in the FT group versus oral BPH medications (8.08% versus 27.85% at 3 years, p < 0.0001). LF incidence of intervention or AUR in placebo CO group with FT versus placebo CO group with oral medications was reduced (6.07% versus 33.3% at 3 years, p < 0.0001). 28/28 secondary efficacy endpoints were reached in LF CO re-injection studies. CONCLUSIONS:FT 2.5 mg is a safe and effective transrectal injectable for LT treatment of BPH. FT treated patients also had reduced need for BPH intervention, and reduced incidence of PCa and AUR.

AIMS/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to assess erection quality with sildenafil vs placebo and adverse events (AEs) according to age (≤45, 46-55 and ≥56 years) in 997 men with erectile dysfunction (ED) using pooled data from four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose trials. METHODS:The trials included 6- to 10-week treatment periods. The starting sildenafil dose was 50 mg, taken ~1 hour before sexual activity but not more than once daily, with subsequent adjustment to 100 or 25 mg based on efficacy and safety. Exclusion criteria included blood pressure <90/50 or >170/110 mmHg, taking nitrate therapy or nitric oxide donors, severe cardiac failure/unstable angina or recent stroke or myocardial infarction. Changes from baseline in Quality of Erection Questionnaire (QEQ), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) scores were analysed. RESULTS:Improvements in QEQ scores with sildenafil vs placebo were significant (P<.0001) for the overall sample (33.7 sildenafil; 8.1 placebo) and each age group (≤45 years: 38.5 sildenafil, 13.9 placebo; 46-55 years: 34.9 sildenafil, 5.8 placebo; ≥56 years: 26.9 sildenafil, 4.9 placebo). IIEF Erectile Function domain (P<.0001), question 3 (achieving erection; P<.003), and question 4 (maintaining erection; P<.001) scores also improved significantly for the overall sample and each age group. Treatment satisfaction was significantly greater (P<.0001) with sildenafil vs placebo for the overall sample and each age group. The most common AEs with sildenafil were headache, flushing and nasal congestion in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS:Sildenafil significantly improved erection quality across all age groups of men with ED. Efficacy improvements with sildenafil were consistent with the QEQ, IIEF, and EDITS. AEs were comparable across age groups. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00159900, NCT00147628, NCT00301262, NCT00343200.

AIM: Evaluate efficacy/safety of bremelanotide (BMT), a melanocortin-receptor-4 agonist, to treat female sexual dysfunctions in premenopausal women. METHODS: Patients randomized to receive placebo or BMT 0.75, 1.25 or 1.75 mg self-administered subcutaneously, as desired, over 12 weeks. Primary end point was change in satisfying sexual events/month. Secondary end points included total score changes on female sexual function index and female sexual distress scale-desire/arousal/orgasm. RESULTS: Efficacy data, n = 327. For 1.25/1.75-mg pooled versus placebo, mean changes from baseline to study end were +0.7 versus +0.2 satisfying sexual events/month (p = 0.0180), +3.6 versus +1.9 female sexual function index total score (p = 0.0017), -11.1 versus -6.8 female sexual distress scale-desire/arousal/orgasm total score (p = 0.0014). Adverse events: nausea, flushing, headache. CONCLUSION: In premenopausal women with female sexual dysfunctions, self-administered, as desired, subcutaneous BMT was safe, effective, and well tolerated (NCT01382719).

OBJECTIVE:To assess effects of tadalafil vs placebo on prostatic blood flow measured by transrectal ultrasonography in men aged ≥45 years with moderate-to-severe benign prostatic hyperplasia-lower urinary tract symptoms. METHODS:After screening and washout, patients were randomized to placebo (n = 50) or tadalafil 5 mg (n = 47) once daily for 8 weeks. Transrectal ultrasonography was performed at baseline, 4, and 8 weeks. The primary efficacy measure was the prostate transition zone (TZ) resistive index (RI). Secondary efficacy measures were RI in the peripheral zone and bladder neck, color pixel intensity (CPI), and color pixel density (CPD) in all 3 regions. Outcomes were assessed using mixed-model repeated-measures analyses. RESULTS:The overall treatment effect (tadalafil vs placebo) for the change from baseline through week 8 in prostate TZ RI was not statistically significant (least squares mean change: placebo, -0.01; tadalafil, 0.00; P = .118), nor was the change from baseline in prostate TZ CPI (P = .564) or CPD (P = .592). Results were similar for all flow measures in prostate peripheral zone and bladder neck. The adverse event profile was consistent with previous studies with no new safety findings. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Tadalafil for 8 weeks in men with BPH-LUTS did not result in detectable decreases in arterial RI or increases in CPI or CPD in the prostate or bladder neck. Detection of changes may not be possible because of already low baseline RI, insufficient sensitivity of techniques used, or may have been confounded by methodologic variability across sites. Alternatively, other possible mechanisms not assessed in this study may be more prominently involved.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to examine the effects of a green and black tea extract blend [AssuriTEA Men's Health (AMH)] in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). METHODS:In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 46 men aged 30-70 with an American Urologic Association symptom score (AUAss) of at least 8 and up to 24 were randomized to 500 mg AMH, 1000 mg AMH, or placebo daily for 12 weeks. Measurements were taken at baseline (BL), week 6 and week 12 for AUAss, simple uroflowmetry, postvoid residual volume (PVR), C-reactive protein (CRP), Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). RESULTS:A total of 40 subjects completed the study. AUAss decreased 34.5% from BL to week 12 in the 1000 mg AMH group (p = 0.008). At week 12, CRP increased in the 500 mg AMH (p = 0.003) and placebo (p = 0.012) groups from their BL levels but not in the 1000 mg group. Average urine flow (Qmean) increased in the 500 mg (p = 0.033) and 1000 mg AMH (p = 0.002) groups versus placebo. PVR decreased in the 1000 mg AMH group (p = 0.034) from BL at week 6. Treatment group effects were observed for the physical functioning and sexual desire domains of the SF-36 and IIEF (p = 0.051 and p = 0.005 respectively). AMH was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS:Oral administration of AMH improved LUTS and quality of life in as little as 6 weeks.

PURPOSE: The detection of prostate cancer relies primarily on abnormal digital rectal examination or increased serum prostate specific antigen concentration. However, low positive predictive values result in many men with increased prostate specific antigen and/or suspicious digital rectal examination having a negative biopsy. We investigated the value of the PCA3 (prostate cancer gene 3) urine test in predicting the likelihood of diagnosis of cancer before biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective, community based clinical trial to evaluate PCA3 score before any biopsy. This trial was conducted at 50 urology practices in the United States. Samples were obtained from 1,962 men with increased serum prostate specific antigen (greater than 2.5 ng/ml) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination before transrectal prostate needle biopsy. Study samples (urinary PCA3 and biopsies) were processed and analyzed by a central laboratory. Sensitivity-specificity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 1,913 urine samples (97.5%) were adequate for PCA3 testing. Of 802 cases diagnosed with prostate cancer 222 had high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical small acinar proliferation and were suspicious for cancer, whereas 889 cases were benign. The traditional PCA3 cutoff of 35 reduced the number of false-positives from 1,089 to 249, a 77.1% reduction. However, false-negatives (missed cancers) increased significantly from 17 to 413, an increase of more than 2,300%. Lowering the PCA3 cutoff to 10 reduced the number of false-positives 35.4% and false-negatives only increased 5.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary PCA3 testing in conjunction with prostate specific antigen has the potential to significantly decrease the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies.

Introduction. Men with hypogonadism exhibit decreased serum testosterone levels and may experience a constellation of clinical symptoms, including decrease in muscle mass, loss of sexual desire, impotence, and infertility. While previous studies have shown that implantation of extended release testosterone pellets can provide therapeutic levels of testosterone over several months, additional data are needed to establish this approach as the standard of care for male hypogonadism. Aim. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of testosterone pellets over 6 months as a treatment for male hypogonadism in a clinical practice setting. Methods. A phase IV, single center, open-label study designed to assess the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous insertion of 8 to 12 testosterone 75 mg pellets (450 mg to 900 mg), during a single implantation procedure in hypogonadal men. Subjects who successfully completed the protocol were allowed to enroll in an extension study that included another implantation and 6 months of follow-up. Main Outcome Measures. Safety was determined by investigator-reported adverse events, changes in vital signs, physical exam findings, and laboratory tests. Efficacy was based on serum laboratory tests, physical exams, implantation site evaluations, and vital signs. Secondary objectives were to assess patient preference for testosterone pellets and to maintain optimal total testosterone. Results. Mean testosterone significantly increased and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels significantly decreased from pre-implantation values at weeks 1, 4, and 12, and had returned to pre-implantation levels by week 24. Prostate-specific antigen levels remained unchanged for the duration of the study. Improvements in several symptoms of hypogonadism were determined with multiple questionnaires. Implanted testosterone pellets were generally well tolerated. Conclusion. Implanted testosterone pellets can normalize testosterone and LH levels and improve symptoms for at least 3 months and up to 6 months in men with hypogonadism, and should be considered as a therapeutic option for hypogonadal men. Kaminetsky JC, Moclair B, Hemani M, and Sand M. A phase IV prospective evaluation of the safety and efficacy of extended release testosterone pellets for the treatment of male hypogonadism. J Sex Med **;**:**-**