Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Postoperative dysphagia is a known complication of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with reported incidences ranging from 1 to 79%. No standardized guidelines exist for spine surgeons to evaluate postoperative dysphagia after ACDF. A systematic method may be beneficial in distinguishing transient postoperative dysphagia secondary to intubation from those with postoperative complications. This study evaluates the causes, recognition, and clinical evaluation of postoperative dysphagia following ACDF. METHODS:International classification of disease (ICD) and current procedural terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify ACDF patients and compared to anterior lumbar discectomy and fusion (ALDF), serving as a control group, between the years 2015-2019 and those diagnosed with dysphagia within 1 year. Demographics, operative details, and clinical evaluation were reviewed. Exclusion criteria included history of head and neck procedures, cancer, stroke, radiation, and trauma. RESULTS:One hundred thirty-one ACDF and 93 ALDF patients met inclusion criteria. Twenty-seven (20.6%) ACDF patients were diagnosed with dysphagia within 1 year. Less than half of the dysphagia patients had the word "dysphagia" documented in their 1-month spine surgeon follow up visit. Only 66% of dysphagia patients had specialist evaluation and one third of those patients were referred by their surgeon. Only six patients received diagnostic barium swallow evaluations. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Postoperative dysphagia risk increases in ACDF compared to ALDF, likely due to underlying anatomy. Postoperative dysphagia symptoms are not effectively documented by spine surgeons and as a result underevaluated by dysphagia specialists. Patients may benefit from more extensive pre- and post-operative screening, evaluation, and referral regarding dysphagia symptoms following ACDF.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS:Dysphagia is associated with increased mortality and healthcare costs. The modified barium swallow study (MBS) is the gold standard in assessing oropharyngeal dysphagia, but does not evaluate the esophagus. A barium esophagram can visualize the esophagus but does not evaluate the oropharyngeal swallow, nor does it utilize the expertise of speech and language pathologists. Providers may order one or both studies yet still risk missing critical pathology. STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective cohort study. METHODS:A retrospective chart review was conducted at an academic medical center between January 2016 and June 2019 focused on patients who had both MBS and esophagram as imaging for dysphagia evaluation. Analysis determined whether MBS and esophagram performed concomitantly improved diagnostic clarity. RESULTS:A total of 5,183 patients underwent 6,066 swallow studies for dysphagia in the study period. Of which, 124 of these patients had concurrent MBS and esophagram. 10.5% of concurrent studies demonstrated a congruent negative evaluation. 59.7% of patients had an unremarkable MBS or esophagram paired with abnormal findings within the corresponding esophagram or MBS, respectively. 29.8% had both MBS and esophagrams that demonstrated an abnormality, but with unique pathologies identified by each study. In total, 85.1% of unremarkable MBS or esophagrams were paired with abnormal findings in the corresponding esophagram or MBS, respectively. CONCLUSION:Selection of diagnostic testing is variable among providers and may be influenced by healthcare systems. This analysis revealed that MBS and esophagrams provide unique diagnoses. Concurrent MBS and esophagrams may improve diagnostic accuracy, yet minimize additional studies. National practices around dysphagia diagnostics are inconsistent and would benefit from standardization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:4 Laryngoscope, 131:2666-2670, 2021.

Protective immunity and latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in humans are associated with the formation of mature protective granulomas within the lung. Unfortunately, understanding the importance of such structures has been hindered by the lack of small-animal models that can develop mature granulomas. In this article, we describe for the first time, to our knowledge, the formation of mature, fibrotic M. tuberculosis-containing pulmonary granulomas in a mouse model of IL-10 deficiency (CBA/J IL-10(-/-)). Long-term control of M. tuberculosis infection in the absence of IL-10 was also associated with an early and enhanced capacity for Ag presentation and a significant increase in the generation of multifunctional T cells. Although IL-10 deficiency is known to enhance Th1 immune responses in general, we demonstrate in this study using transient anti-IL-10R treatment that it is the presence of IL-10 in vivo during the first month of M. tuberculosis infection that plays a definitive role in the inhibition of optimum protective immunity that can establish the environment for mature granuloma formation. Although the importance of IL-10 during M. tuberculosis infection has been debated, our data demonstrate that in CBA/J mice, IL-10 plays a significant early inhibitory role in preventing the development of protective immunity associated with containment of M. tuberculosis infection.