Faculty Bibliography

Youth living with chronic medical conditions and their families face several challenges (e.g., adjustment to a new diagnosis, ongoing daily condition management, coping with potential long-term consequences of illness). Traditional CBT approaches emphasize collaborative problem-solving with a core focus on change. At times, these approaches may feel inaccessible or unhelpful for pediatric patients and their families who are facing illness-related challenges that they cannot change or control. Dialectical behavior therapy integrates CBT-based change interventions with acceptance-based strategies to normalize challenging thoughts and emotions and help individuals feel validated. Medical providers working with pediatric patients and families can also benefit from a DBT-based conceptualization and approach to improve patient/family-provider relationships. This article summarizes the current evidence base for and justifies the use of adaptations of DBT for patients with medical illness. Further, through clinical case examples, it illustrates the use of DBT skills and concepts in improving outcomes for pediatric patients and their families.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:We examined data from a large, high acuity, pediatric psychiatric emergency department (ED) to assess both the immediate and longer-term impact of the pandemic on ED visits for suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) among youth. METHODS:Youth ages 5-17 years presenting at a pediatric psychiatric ED in New York, NY from March 2019-November 2021 were included in this study. Visits were categorized as pre-pandemic, pandemic year 1, or pandemic year 2. We examined changes in demographic and clinical characteristics among patients presenting across the three time periods, as well as multivariable associations between these characteristics and STBs. RESULTS:Over 32 months, 2728 patients presented at 4161 visits. The prevalence of a discharge diagnosis of STBs increased from 21.2% pre-pandemic to 26.3% (p < 0.001) during pandemic year 1, and further increased to 30.1% (p = 0.049) during pandemic year 2. Youth were 21% more likely to receive a discharge diagnosis of STBs in pandemic year 1 (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.07, 1.36) and 35% more likely in pandemic year 2 (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.19, 1.52) compared to pre-pandemic baseline. CONCLUSIONS:In a large, high-acuity ED, STBs continued to increase 20 months after the initial COVID-19 lockdown. These findings highlight the persistent detrimental impact of the pandemic on youth mental health.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:This systematic literature review explores the evidence base related to the diagnosis and clinical management of eating disorders among transgender and gender nonbinary (TGNB) youth. Through an exploration of the literature, this review highlights key considerations for providers working with this population, including the complex relationship between body image and gender, the assessment of subthreshold eating disorder symptoms, the impact of gender-affirming care on eating disorder treatment outcomes, and available evidence-based metrics, with attention to factors impacting treatment, including family support, psychiatric comorbidities, and community safety. METHODS:We conducted a search of the databases PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE for articles pertaining to eating disorders and TGNB youth, with forward citation chaining conducted via Google Scholar to provide a review of recent publications. Twenty-six articles published from 2017 to 2022 met the criteria for full-text review. RESULTS:The selected articles primarily explored data from the United States and varied widely in methodology, including a systematic literature review (n = 1), narrative literature reviews (n = 3), case series (n = 4), case studies (n = 2), cross-sectional population surveys (n = 7), cross-sectional patient surveys (n = 3), other cross-sectional studies (n = 3), retrospective chart reviews (n = 2), and a retrospective longitudinal cohort study (n = 1). Most commonly, researchers sampled patients within the setting of gender clinics. Researchers used a range of validated measures in clinical settings, with the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire most frequently reported. The literature highlights several considerations unique to transgender populations, including the complex relationship between gender dysphoria, body dissatisfaction, disordered eating behavior, and gender-affirming care. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:In clinical settings with TGNB youth, providers may consider implementing validated screening measures to assess for eating disorders. Future research should emphasize a nuanced understanding of the heterogeneity among TGNB patient populations and the impact of gender identity on treatment of eating disorders.

OBJECTIVE:To describe a sample of minoritized youth who screened positive for suicide risk within medical subspecialty pediatrics, compared to non-minoritized youth and describe the screening outcomes of these youth. METHODS:This retrospective chart review from October 2018 to April 2021 used electronic medical record data from an academic pediatric medical subspecialty clinic that screens universally for suicide risk for all patients ages 9 and up. Chart reviews were conducted for 237 minoritized youth (operationalized as identifying as non-White or Hispanic/Latinx, identifying as a gender minority, and having a preferred language other than English) who screened positive for suicide risk. Descriptive statistics include need for escalation to an emergency room, connection to mental health care, receival of a mental health referral, and attendance at follow-up visits. RESULTS:Minoritized youth were more likely to screen positive and report a history of suicide attempt when compared to non-minoritized peers. Youth identifying as gender expansive had significant elevation in suicide risk. The majority of youth in this sample were already connected to mental health care, with youth preferring a language other than English being the least likely to be connected. CONCLUSIONS:Findings indicate heightened suicide risk for minoritized youth, with gender expansive youth having particularly elevated suicide risk. A need to support youth with a preferred language other than English in getting connected to mental health care was also revealed.

OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to characterize suicide risk screening results for youth in pediatric ambulatory subspecialty clinics. METHOD/METHODS:The Ask Suicide-Screening Questions was administered to patients ages 9-24 years in 12 subspecialty clinics to assess suicide risk, determined by suicide ideation/behavior. The SAMSHA-HRSA standard framework for integrated health was used to categorize each clinic's level of behavioral health integration. RESULTS:6365 patients completed 7440 suicide risk screens; 6.2% of patients screened positive at their initial screen and 4.1% at subsequent annual screens. There was no dose-response pattern between increasing level of integration and decreasing likelihood of a positive suicide screen. Youth identifying as gender expansive were 3.1 times (95% CI [2.0, 4.9]) more likely to screen positive as compared to cisgender youth, adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, screen type, year, and clinic integration level. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Results surrounding disparities in suicide risk based on gender identity underscore the importance of further investigating how to optimally identify and manage high-risk, often understudied youth at suicide risk.

Objective: This review aims to provide a brief introduction of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) and discuss the role of psychology for the integration of CDSSs for child mental health into pediatric subspecialty care. Methods: A review of literature regarding CDSSs used for physical and mental health services was conducted to lay the foundation for our recommendations. Results: Children with chronic physical illness are twice as likely to suffer from mental illness as compared to healthy controls. These mental health problems are often discovered in pediatric subspecialty care. Yet their mental health needs are often unaddressed when the sections of pediatric subspecialty care and mental health are not well coordinated. CDSSs could help subspecialty providers with evidence-based decision-making regarding mental health screening and referrals. That is, CDSSs could enhance the access to most effective mental health treatment for children. However, the implementation of CDSSs in pediatric subspecialty care is very limited. Conclusions: Psychologists could assist subspecialty providers with advocating CDSSs to administrative and information technology staff, as well as build, customize, evaluate, and update CDSSs.