Faculty Bibliography

Bladder cancer is the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer in men and the eighth most common cancer in women in the USA. Efforts to reduce mortality from bladder cancer must focus on three areas: prevention, development of effective therapies for muscle-invasive and metastatic disease, and early detection of potentially invasive lesions while they are still superficial and amenable to less morbid, but still effective, treatments. As more effective therapies for metastatic transitional cell carcinoma are not on the immediate horizon and preventive measures (except for smoking cessation) have been disappointing, if we are to reduce this disease's morbidity and mortality rates significantly, early detection strategies need to be improved and implemented. The goal of screening for any type of cancer is to detect the disease in its early stages in order to increase the chances for cure or prolongation of life (before micro or gross metastases occur). Since all patients who die of bladder cancer do so from metastases and since almost all patients with metastases have muscle-invading cancers appearing as the first bladder cancer event, diagnosing cancers destined to become muscle invading before they actually are should reduce bladder cancer mortality. This special report reviews the current state of bladder cancer screening in the USA.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Erectile function after prostate surgery is an important criterion for patients when they are choosing a treatment modality for prostate cancer. Improved visualization, dexterity, and precision afforded by the da Vinci robot allow a precise dissection of the neurovascular bundles. We objectively assessed erectile function after robot-assisted extraperitoneal prostatectomy by using the SHIM (IIEF-5) validated questionnaire. METHODS: Between July 2003 and September 2004, 150 consecutive men underwent da Vinci robot-assisted extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. The IIEF-5 questionnaire was used to assess postoperative potency in 67 patients who were at least 6 months postsurgery. Erectile function was classified as impotent (<11), moderate dysfunction (11 to 15), mild dysfunction (16 to 21), and potent (22 to 25). All patients used oral pharmacological assistance postprocedure. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were available to complete the IIEF-5 questionnaire 6 months to 1 year postprostatectomy. Twelve patients were excluded from the study who abstained from all sexual activity after surgery for emotional or social reasons. Of the 55 patients evaluated, 22 (40%) were impotent, 3 (5.5%) had moderate ED, 12 (21.8%) had mild ED, and 18 (32.7%) were fully potent. The table compares IIEF-5 scores with nerve-sparing status. Of patients who had bilateral nerve sparing, 28/45 (62.2%) had mild or no ED within 6 to 12 months postsurgery, and all expressed satisfaction with their current sexual function or rate of improvement after robotic prostatectomy. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted extraperitoneal prostatectomy provides comparable outcomes to those of open surgery with regards to erectile function. Assessment of the ultimate maximal erectile function will require continued analysis, as this is likely to further improve beyond 6 to 12 months.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A large prostate can complicate an extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). We report our experience with RARP and evaluate the effects of prostate size on treatment outcomes after extraperitoneal RARP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Information on 355 consecutive patients undergoing extraperitoneal RARP was gathered, and patients with prostate weight <75 g (N = 319) were compared with those having glands >or=75 g (N = 36). The factors considered were age, body mass index, total operating time, estimated blood loss, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) concentration, pathologic stage and Gleason grade, intraoperative and peri-operative complications, margin status, and continence. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) was noted in age (59 v 64 years), PSA concentration (6.07 v 8.9 ng/dL), and blood loss (175 v 226 mL) between patients with smaller v larger prostates. No difference was seen in Gleason score (6 v 6), clinical T stage, operative time (217 v 225 minutes), or total positive-margin rate (13% v 19%). A higher positive-margin rate was seen in patients with stage T(3) disease and larger prostates. The 6-month continence rate in patients with a prostate volume < 75 g was 97% v 84% in patients with larger prostate volumes ( P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although a large prostate volume is associated with a slight increase in short-term urinary complications postoperatively, it should not be considered a contraindication for the experienced surgeon. This higher risk raises the question of a possible need for longer catheterization in this subset of patients.

Several recent studies have suggested that thought leaders in radical prostatectomy have decreased their own positive margin rates by switching from open to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Theoretically, this improvement is largely attributed to enhanced visualization of the deep pelvis and precision of dissection afforded by the instrumentation. To date, it has not been determined if this phenomenon exists amongst non-fellowship-trained urologists in private practice. Herein, we describe the positive margin rates of two non-fellowship-trained private-practice urologists who converted from open radical retropubic prostatectomy to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. The margin positivity data from two non-fellowship-trained private-practice urologists (surgeon 1 and surgeon 2) were reviewed retrospectively. The last 50 cases of open radical retropubic prostatectomy from each surgeon were compared with the first 50 robotic prostatectomy cases of surgeons 1 and 2, respectively. A positive surgical margin was defined as tumor present at the inked margin of the prostate. There was a significant decrease in the overall and pT2 positive margin rates for both surgeons. The overall positive margin rate and pT2 positive margin rate for surgeon 1 dropped from 44 to 20% and from 37 to 5.7%, respectively, after changing from open to robotic prostatectomy. For surgeon 2, the overall positive margin rate changed from 26 to 18% and the pT2 positive margin rate changed from 27.5 to 7% after converting. Changing from open to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy may improve the ability of urologists to obtain negative surgical margins. With proper training this phenomenon does seem to apply to non-fellowship-trained urologists in private practice and can be realized within the first 50 cases performed.

An inummohistochemical and western blot expression analysis of human ureters was performed in order to characterize the alpha-1-adrenergic receptor distribution along the length of the human ureteral wall. Mapping the distribution will assist in understanding the potential role alpha-1-adrenergic receptors and their subtype density might have in the pathophysiology of ureteral colic and stone passage. Patients diagnosed with renal cancer or bladder cancer undergoing nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy, or cystectomy had ureteral specimens taken from the proximal, mid, distal and tunneled ureter. Tissues were processed for fresh frozen examination and fixed in formalin. None of the ureteral specimens were involved with cancer. Serial histologic sections and immunohistochemical studies were performed using antibodies specific for alpha-1-adrenergic receptor subtypes (alpha 1a, alpha 1b, alpha 1d). The sections were examined under a light microscope and scored as positive or negative. In order to validate and quantify the alpha receptor subtypes along the human ureter, Western blotting techniques were applied. Human ureter stained positively for alpha-1-adrenergic receptors. Immunostaining appeared red, with intense reaction in the smooth muscle of the ureter and endothelium of the neighboring blood vessels. There was differential expression between all the receptors with the highest staining for alpha-ID subtype. The highest protein expression for all three subtypes was in the renal pelvis and decreased with advancement along the ureter to the distal ureter. At the distal ureter, there was marked increase in expression as one progressed towards the ureteral orifice. The same pattern of protein expression was exhibited for all three alpha-1-adrenergic receptor subtypes. We provide preliminary evidence for the ability to detect and quantify the alpha-1-receptor subtypes along the human ureter which to the best of our knowledge has never been done with immunohistochemistry and molecular techniques. These findings may lend support to the preliminary studies of the effectiveness of alpha-receptor blockade on ureteral colic and stone passage.