Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma is a chondrosarcoma subtype associated with high rates of recurrence and a poor prognosis. Others have proposed treatment of dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma using osteosarcoma protocols, including perioperative chemotherapy. However, the rarity of this condition poses difficulties in undertaking single- institution studies of sufficient sample size. QUESTION/PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Is perioperative chemotherapy associated with improved overall survival in patients with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma? METHODS:We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 1973 to 2016 database for patients with a diagnosis of dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (n = 308). As dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma was only classified as a distinct entity in SEER starting in 2000, only patients treated in 2000 and later were included. We excluded from our analyses those patients with distant disease at diagnosis, a primary site of disease other than bone or joints, and those who did not receive cancer-directed surgery. These criteria yielded 185 dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma patients for inclusion. We used Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models to assess the association of clinical, demographic, and treatment characteristics on overall survival (OS). RESULTS:After controlling for confounding variables, including age, sex, tumor size, stage, grade, location, and radiation treatment status, and after adjusting for missing data, no overall survival benefit was associated with receipt of chemotherapy in patients with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (hazard ratio 0.75 [95% confidence interval 0.49 to 1.12]; p = 0.16). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Chemotherapy treatment of dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma was not associated with improved OS. These results must be viewed cautiously, given the limited granularity of information on chemotherapy treatment, the concerns regarding chemotherapy misclassification in SEER data, and the small sample of patients with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma, all of which limit the power to detect a difference. Our findings are nevertheless consistent with those of prior reports in which no benefit of chemotherapy could be detected. Lack of clear benefit from perioperative chemotherapy in dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma argues that it should be used only after careful consideration, and ideally in the context of a clinical trial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III, therapeutic study.

Risk stratification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is based on experience with tumors of the stomach, small bowel, and rectum, which are far more common than GISTs of other sites. In this study from 47 institutions, we analyzed GISTs of the esophagus (n = 102), colon (n = 136), and appendix (n = 27) for their size, mitotic rate, morphology, and outcome to determine which criteria predict their behavior. Esophageal GISTs were small (median: 2.5 cm) with spindle cell morphology and a low mitotic rate (mean: 3.6/5 mm2). Twelve (12%) tumors progressed, including 11 with a mitotic rate >5/5 mm2 and one large (6.8 cm) GIST with a mitotic rate of 2/5 mm2. Colonic GISTs were smaller (median: 1.4 cm) and presented with abdominal pain or bleeding in 29% of cases. Most (92%) were composed of spindle cells with a mean mitotic rate of 4.6/5 mm2. Sixteen (12%) tumors progressed: 14 had mitotic rates >5/5 mm2, and two were >5.0 cm with a mitotic rate <5/5 mm2. All but one appendiceal GIST measured <2.0 cm. These tumors were composed of spindle cells with low mitotic rates (<5/5 mm2), and none progressed. Our results suggest that progression risk among esophageal and colonic GISTs is associated with increased mitotic activity (>5/5 mm2) and size >5.0 cm. These findings support the use of size and mitotic rate for prognostication of GISTs in these locations, similar to tumors of the stomach, small bowel, and rectum.

BACKGROUND:Histologic grading using the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre Le Cancer (FNCLCC) system is not universally accepted as applicable to malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), as its prognostic value is not well established. METHODS:We retrospectively evaluated 99 cases of MPNST to investigate any association between the outcomes overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and predictor variables FNCLCC grade, clinical setting, tumor location, and tumor size at diagnosis using multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis. RESULTS:Univariable and multivariable analysis demonstrate a statistically significant association between FNCLCC grade and both OS and PFS when comparing tumors by histologic grade. Of note, no deaths were observed in patients with grade 1 MPNST. Other variables associated with unfavorable outcomes include fragmented resection and primary site, with tumors in the extremities having favorable OS, but not PFS, when compared with those in truncal locations. Tumors in the head and neck had favorable PFS, but not OS, compared with those in the trunk. No statistically significant differences in OS or PFS were observed when comparing patient age and sex, tumor size at diagnosis, clinical setting (primary vs. type-1 neurofibromatosis vs. radiation associated) or history of neoadjuvant therapy. Interobserver agreement for FNCLCC grading of these tumors was considered good (S*=0.77, 95% confidence interval: 0.71-0.84). CONCLUSIONS:Association between FNCLCC grading and survival outcomes in MPNST suggests potential value to routinely grading these neoplasms. However, the subjectivity of the grading system, particularly when assigning a tumor differentiation score, may pose a challenge, especially in low and intermediate grade lesions.