Faculty Bibliography

Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity as well as non-nodular sclerosis (non-NS) histologic subtypes have demonstrated poorer outcomes compared to EBV-negative and nodular sclerosis cases. We report a prespecified subset analysis of patients enrolled in the phase III SWOG S1826 trial to evaluate outcomes based on EBV status and histologic subtype in patients treated with nivolumab-AVD (N-AVD) or brentuximab vedotin (BV)-AVD. In the phase III SWOG S1826 trial, patients with stage III-IV cHL were randomized to N-AVD or BV-AVD. Of 970 eligible patients, 522 had known EBV status. N-AVD improved 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) in EBV-positive (91% v 70%; HR, 0.30; P = 0.01) and EBV-negative patients (90% v 84%; HR, 0.64; P = 0.09). Among 664 patients with slides available for histology review, 102 (15.4%) had non-NS subtypes. N-AVD prolonged 3-year PFS in patients with non-NS (86% v 63%; HR, 0.33; P = 0.006) and NS histologic subtype (93% v 86%; HR, 0.53; P = 0.01). Non-NS histology independently was associated with inferior outcomes (HR, 2.54; P < 0.0001) after adjusting for treatment in the entire cohort. However, N-AVD treatment still had favorable PFS within this high-risk group. In addition, patients with EBV positivity or non-NS histology cHL treated with BV-AVD had significantly worse PFS (HR, 1.97; P = 0.03 for EBV; and HR, 3.08; P < 0.0001 for histology). N-AVD substantially abrogated the historically poor prognosis associated with EBV positivity and non-NS histology in advanced-stage cHL. These results support N-AVD as frontline standard of care, particularly in high-risk biologic subgroups. (NCT03907488).

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Although patients with FL have high response rates to therapy, most develop increasingly resistant disease. In addition, transformation into an aggressive lymphoma is associated with unfavorable outcomes. Many novel agents are under investigation, and early clinical data are encouraging. Aligning treatment with the underlying tumor biology and sequencing of therapies remain key clinical challenges. At the Lymphoma Research Foundation's biannual 2024 Follicular Lymphoma Scientific Workshop, experts convened to discuss the role of chemotherapy in the context of new therapies, the impact of early progression on treatment sequencing, novel end points in clinical trials, disease biology and the tumor microenvironment, and new treatments on the horizon. This report focuses on updates in FL biology, first-line treatment, the role of progression of disease in 24 months, clinical trial design, and redefining cure in FL.

This phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combining acalabrutinib (A) and lenalidomide (L) with either rituximab (ALR) or obinutuzumab (ALO), with longitudinal minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring in frontline MCL treatment (ClinicalTrials.gov - NCT03863184). The primary objective was molecular CR after 12 cycles of induction, defined by Lugano criteria and undetectable MRD <10-6 (uMRD6) by clonoSEQ. Secondary objectives included safety, responses and survival. Exploratory objectives included tumor mutation profiles and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by CAPP-Seq. Patients in uMRD6 molecular CR were eligible for discontinuation of A+L after 24 cycles; all patients received a minimum of 36 cycles of anti-CD20 antibody treatment. In the ALR cohort, grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (4%) and anemia (4%). Non-hematologic toxicities included rash (42%), fatigue (4%), nausea (4%), and vomiting (4%). The ORR was 100%, CR 83% and molecular CR 67% after 12 cycles of induction, with best molecular CR at 83%. At a median follow-up of 53 months (range 46-60), the 4-yr OS and PFS for ALR were 91% and 76%, respectively. TP53 mutations were adversely associated with PFS (p=0.026). For ALO, ORR, CR and molecular CR were 90% following induction, and 2-yr OS and PFS were both at 100%. Longitudinal cfDNA analysis in ALR revealed clonal evolution during response and progression. This safe and active regimen is feasible as a time-limited initial therapy for MCL patients and warrants further evaluation in response-adapted strategy.

Progress in the therapy of follicular lymphoma (FL), the most common indolent lymphoma subtype, has been achieved in recent years with significant improvement in median overall survival. Most patients diagnosed with FL will now die from other causes. Multiple novel immunotherapy and other targeted therapies are now approved for relapsed and refractory disease. However, early progression and transformation to aggressive lymphoma remain key issues requiring further innovation. We expect that bispecific antibodies will likely move to earlier use and in novel combinations. Future generations of these and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy will be developed in an effort to minimize toxicity and improve efficacy. New technologies, such as circulating tumor DNA assays, may enable more rational selection and guidance of therapy duration or changes in treatment, as well as possibly substituting for follow-up imaging while monitoring patients. We also look forward to more extensive use of quality-of-life tools to select treatment for patients who have a favorable long-term outlook with multiple options. Finally, patients and clinicians now envision a day when FL is no longer referred to as "incurable." Having a definition and possibility of a "cure" and being able to optimize such a mindset in the approach of FL would represent a major advance in our future management strategy.

Older patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) have inferior survival compared with younger patients. We report a subset analysis of older patients (60 years and older) enrolled in the phase three S1826 trial conducted by SWOG that randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage (III-IV) cHL to six cycles of nivolumab (N)-AVD or brentuximab vedotin (BV)-AVD. Of 103 enrolled patients 60 years and older, 99 were eligible. At a median follow-up of 2.1 years, the 2-year progression-free survival was 89% after N-AVD (n = 50) and 64% after BV-AVD (n = 49, HR 0.24, 95%CI 0.09-0.63, 1-sided stratified log-rank P = .001). The 2-year OS was 96% with N-AVD versus 85% with BV-AVD (HR 0.16, 95%CI 0.03-0.75 stratified 1-sided log-rank P = .005). Six cycles were delivered without dose reduction in 69% on N-AVD and 26% on BV-AVD; 55% discontinued BV, and 14% discontinued nivolumab. The nonrelapse mortality was 16% with BV-AVD and 6% with N-AVD. Despite more neutropenia with N-AVD, febrile neutropenia, sepsis, and infections were higher with BV-AVD, as was peripheral neuropathy. Patient-reported outcomes of key adverse events confirmed the improved toxicity profile of N-AVD over BV-AVD. N-AVD was better tolerated and more effective than BV-AVD and is therefore a new standard of care for older patients with advanced-stage cHL fit for anthracycline-based combination therapy.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Prognostic discussions are critical in the care of patients with advanced lymphoma, given the disease's complexity, rapidly evolving treatments, and shifting potential for cure. However, previous research has paid limited attention to how these discussions unfold from both patient and clinician perspectives, particularly in the context of early conversations. The current study sought to identify key experiences that inform improvements in clinician communication and patient understanding of prognosis for patients with advanced lymphoma. METHODS:We conducted a qualitative study from July 2023 to June 2024 with 19 patients diagnosed with advanced lymphoma and 3 oncologists. Semi-structured interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic content analysis, and emergent themes were identified through consensus among a trained coding team. RESULTS:Two primary themes emerged. First, patients recalled early prognostic conversations as highly focused on curative intent. Second, oncologists cited incomplete diagnostic data and concerns about overwhelming patients as reasons for limiting early discussions, often delaying deeper prognostic conversations. Clinicians reported tension between maintaining patient hope and providing comprehensive information about disease trajectory and treatment uncertainty. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS:Findings highlight a need for communication strategies that balance hope with realism in early prognostic discussions for patients with advanced lymphoma. Oncologists may benefit from structured, evidence-based guidance to manage information delivery over time, particularly in the face of diagnostic ambiguity. Future research should prioritize inclusive sampling and explore timing and content of ongoing prognostic discussions to better support informed decision-making and goal-concordant care.

BACKGROUND:Incorporating brentuximab vedotin into the treatment of advanced-stage classic Hodgkin's lymphoma improves outcomes in adult and pediatric patients. However, brentuximab vedotin increases the toxic effects of treatment in adults, more than half of pediatric patients who receive the drug undergo consolidative radiation, and relapse remains a challenge. Programmed death 1 blockade is effective in Hodgkin's lymphoma, including in preliminary studies involving previously untreated patients. METHODS:We conducted a phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial involving patients at least 12 years of age with stage III or IV newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma. Patients were randomly assigned to receive brentuximab vedotin with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (BV+AVD) or nivolumab with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (N+AVD). Prespecified patients could receive radiation therapy directed to residual metabolically active lesions. The primary end point was progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomization to the first observation of progressive disease or death from any cause. RESULTS:Of 994 patients who underwent randomization, 970 were included in the intention-to-treat population for efficacy analyses. At the second planned interim analysis, with a median follow-up of 12.1 months, the threshold for efficacy was crossed, indicating that N+AVD significantly improved progression-free survival as compared with BV+AVD (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.48; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.27 to 0.87; two-sided P = 0.001). Owing to the short follow-up time, we repeated the analysis with longer follow-up; with a median follow-up of 2.1 years (range, 0 to 4.2 years), the 2-year progression-free survival was 92% (95% CI, 89 to 94) with N+AVD, as compared with 83% (95% CI, 79 to 86) with BV+AVD (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.65). Overall, 7 patients received radiation therapy. Immune-related adverse events were infrequent with nivolumab; brentuximab vedotin was associated with more treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS:N+AVD resulted in longer progression-free survival than BV+AVD in adolescents and adults with stage III or IV advanced-stage classic Hodgkin's lymphoma and had a better side-effect profile. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health and others; S1826 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03907488.).

UNLABELLED:Exportin-1 (XPO1), the main soluble nuclear export receptor in eukaryotic cells, is frequently overexpressed in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A selective XPO1 inhibitor, selinexor, received approval as single agent for relapsed or refractory (R/R) DLBCL. Elucidating the mechanisms by which XPO1 overexpression supports cancer cells could facilitate further clinical development of XPO1 inhibitors. We uncovered here that XPO1 overexpression increases tolerance to genotoxic stress, leading to a poor response to chemoimmunotherapy. Upon DNA damage induced by MYC expression or exogenous compounds, XPO1 bound and exported EIF4E and THOC4 carrying DNA damage repair mRNAs, thereby increasing synthesis of DNA damage repair proteins under conditions of increased turnover. Consequently, XPO1 inhibition decreased the capacity of lymphoma cells to repair DNA damage and ultimately resulted in increased cytotoxicity. In a phase I clinical trial conducted in R/R DLBCL, the combination of selinexor with second-line chemoimmunotherapy was tolerated with early indication of efficacy. Overall, this study reveals that XPO1 overexpression plays a critical role in the increased tolerance of cancer cells to DNA damage while providing new insights to optimize the clinical development of XPO1 inhibitors. SIGNIFICANCE/UNASSIGNED:XPO1 regulates the dynamic ribonucleoprotein nuclear export in response to genotoxic stress to support tolerance and can be targeted to enhance the sensitivity of cancer cells to endogenous and exogenous DNA damage. See related commentary by Knittel and Reinhardt, p. 3.

In this real-world evaluation of tafasitamab-lenalidomide (TL) in relapsed or refractory LBCL, patients receiving TL had higher rates of comorbidities and high-risk disease characteristics, and substantially lower progression-free survival and overall survival, compared with the L-MIND registration clinical trial for TL.