Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES:Obesity may complicate the peripheral cannulation and delivery of veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (ECLS). With rising global body mass indices (BMI), obesity is becoming increasingly prevalent in severe cardiogenic shock yet its impact on outcomes is not well described. This study sought to examine the relationship between BMI and veno-arterial ECLS outcomes to better inform clinical decision-making. METHODS:All cardiogenic shock patients undergoing peripheral veno-arterial ECLS at our institution from March 2008 to January 2019 were retrospectively analysed (n = 431). Patients were divided into 4 groups, BMI 17.5-24.9, 25-29.9, 30-34.9 and ≥35 kg/m2, and compared on clinical outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify variables associated with survival to discharge, the primary outcome of interest. RESULTS:The median BMI was 28.3 kg/m2 (interquartile range 24.8-32.6) with a range of 17.0-69.1 kg/m2. Obese patients achieved significantly lower percentages of predicted flow rates compared with BMI < 25 kg/m2 patients though did not differ in their lactate clearances. Patients with BMI ≥35 kg/m2 had similar complication rates to the other cohorts but were more likely to require continuous veno-venous haemodialysis (51% vs 25-40% in other cohorts, P = 0.002). Overall survival to discharge was 48% (n = 207/431) with no differences between the cohorts (P = 0.92). Patients with BMI ≥35 kg/m2 had considerably lower survival (10%) in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared with the other groups (P = 0.17). On multivariable logistic regression, BMI was not significantly associated with failure to survive to discharge. CONCLUSIONS:In conclusion, with the rising global prevalence of obesity, the results of our study suggest that clinicians need not treat obesity as a negative prognostic factor in cardiogenic shock requiring ECLS.

We describe 4 cases of spinal cord ischemia resulting in paraplegia after peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock. This is an uncommon, but possibly underreported, complication with significant irreversible long-term morbidity. While causes are likely multifactorial, it is possible that thrombosis may occur at the level of the mixing cloud due to turbulent flow. Additional studies will be needed to elucidate the true incidence of this complication and investigate whether flow dynamics may potentiate clot formation.

OBJECTIVES:The onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced our cardiac surgery programme and hospital to enact drastic measures that has forced us to change how we care for cardiac surgery patients, assist with COVID-19 care and enable support for the hospital in terms of physical resources, providers and resident training. METHODS:In this review, we review the cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 and describe our system-wide adaptations to the pandemic, including the use of telemedicine, how a severe reduction in operative volume affected our programme, the process of redeployment of staff, repurposing of residents into specific task teams, the creation of operation room intensive care units, and the challenges that we faced in this process. RESULTS:We offer a revised set of definitions of surgical priority during this pandemic and how this was applied to our system, followed by specific considerations in coronary/valve, aortic, heart failure and transplant surgery. Finally, we outline a path forward for cardiac surgery for the near future. CONCLUSIONS:We recognize that individual programmes around the world will eventually face COVID-19 with varying levels of infection burden and different resources, and we hope this document can assist programmes to plan for the future.

BACKGROUND:The onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced our cardiac surgery program and hospital to enact drastic measures that has forced us to change how we care for cardiac surgery patients, assist with COVID-19 care, and enable support for the hospital in terms of physical resources, providers, and resident training. METHODS:In this review, we review the cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 and describe our system-wide adaptations to the pandemic, including the use of telemedicine, how a severe reduction in operative volume affected our program, the process of redeployment of staff, repurposing of residents into specific task teams, the creation of operation room intensive care units, and the challenges that we faced in this process. RESULTS:We offer a revised set of definitions of surgical priority during this pandemic and how this was applied to our system, followed by specific considerations in coronary/valve, aortic, heart failure and transplant surgery. Finally, we outline a path forward for cardiac surgery for the near future. CONCLUSIONS:We recognize that individual programs around the world will eventually face COVID-19 with varying levels of infection burden and different resources, and we hope this document can assist programs to plan for the future.

OBJECTIVE:In 2011, a multidisciplinary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) program with a dedicated myectomy surgeon was implemented at our institution. We hypothesized that a dedicated approach allows better identification and management of mitral regurgitation (MR) during septal myectomy (SM) for obstructive HCM with significant mitral regurgitation. METHODS:Between 2006 and 2018, 181 patients had SM at our institution. This study consists of 53 patients with preoperative moderate or greater MR associated with systolic anterior motion who underwent isolated SM with or without mitral intervention. Patients were divided into those who underwent SM by a dedicated myectomy surgeon (group D, n = 31) or by a non-dedicated surgeon (group ND, n = 22). Primary outcome of interest was rate of mitral valve replacement (MVR) at SM. Secondary outcomes include in-hospital mortality, need for permanent pacemaker, mitral valve reoperation, and residual MR and left ventricular outflow tract gradient on postoperative echocardiography. RESULTS:12 patients (55%) had a concomitant MVR during septal myectomy in group ND compared to 2 patients (6%) in group D (p < 0.01). Among patients who did not undergo MVR, patients in group D less commonly had residual MR than patients in ND after SM (p < 0.01). Group D had 100% survival with NYHA class I in 94% patients at follow-up visit (p = 0.01). Reoperation for MVR was required in four patients in group ND vs. none in group D (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:A dedicated surgeon is able to spare the mitral valve in patients undergoing SM. This study emphasizes the importance of surgical expertise in this cohort.

BACKGROUND:The onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced our cardiac surgery program and hospital to enact drastic measures that has forced us to change how we care for cardiac surgery patients, assist with COVID-19 care, and enable support for the hospital in terms of physical resources, providers, and resident training. METHODS:In this review, we review the cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 and describe our system-wide adaptations to the pandemic, including the use of telemedicine, how a severe reduction in operative volume affected our program, the process of redeployment of staff, repurposing of residents into specific task teams, the creation of operation room intensive care units, and the challenges that we faced in this process. RESULTS:We offer a revised set of definitions of surgical priority during this pandemic and how this was applied to our system, followed by specific considerations in coronary/valve, aortic, heart failure and transplant surgery. Finally, we outline a path forward for cardiac surgery for the near future. CONCLUSIONS:We recognize that individual programs around the world will eventually face COVID-19 with varying levels of infection burden and different resources, and we hope this document can assist programs to plan for the future.