Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Early postoperative small bowel obstruction (ESBO) following roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a feared complication, generally estimated to occur in 1-2% of cases. Most surgeons advocate for prompt surgical exploration for ESBO after RYGB. There is currently a paucity of literature regarding conservative management approaches to ESBO after RYGB. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To determine the safety and efficacy of non-operative management of early small bowel obstruction following RYGB. SETTING/METHODS:Academic-affiliated municipal hospital. METHODS:We performed a retrospective review of all patients at a single institution who underwent RYGB between July 1, 2020 and April 30, 2024 and were readmitted within 30 days of the procedure due to a small bowel obstruction. Mesenteric defects were closed with permanent suture in 100% of cases. RESULTS:2430 RYGBs were performed, 54 patients (2.2%) developed ESBO. The average interval from time of surgery to diagnosis of ESBO was 7.3 days [range 2-26 days]. The vast majority of patients (n = 43; 80%) were successfully managed conservatively including nasogastric decompression (n = 20; 47%). Most (73%) of the patients requiring reoperation were found to have kinking at the anastomosis or dense adhesions from the cut end of the staple line. CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrates that non-operative management may be a safe and effective treatment option for the majority of RYGB patients who develop ESBO. Clinical judgement is required to identify those who would benefit from early exploration.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) are increasingly prescribed as an alternative to bariatric surgery for weight loss, and may pose as an alternative to conversion Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (cRYGB) in patients with insufficient weight loss or weight recurrence after sleeve gastrectomy [A C, N C, A I. Postoperative morbidity and weight loss after revisional bariatric surgery for primary failed restrictive procedure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery; 2022;Jensen et al. in Obes Surg 33:1017-1025, 2023; Jamal et al. in Obes Surg 34:1324-1332, 2024; Lautenbach A, Wernecke M, Stoll FD, Meyhöfer SM, Meyhöfer S, Aberel J. 1422-P: The potential of semaglutide once-weekly in patients without Type 2 Diabetes with weight regain or insufficient weight loss after bariatric surgery. Diabetes 2022; 71(Supplement_1);]. METHODS AND PROCEDURES/METHODS:Adult patients ≥ 18 years old, who previously underwent a sleeve gastrectomy and were subsequently treated with weekly injectable Semaglutide or Tirzepatide, or treated with conversion from sleeve gastrectomy were included for analysis. Patients converted for GERD, GLP1-RA use with BMI ≤ 35, or pre operative GLP1-RA use were excluded. Post operative weights and Hgb A1C were assessed from 3 months to 3 years post intervention (start of GLP1-RA or surgery). T-test, ANOVA, and chi-squared analysis were used to compare groups, while multivariable linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the effect of bariatric surgery on %TBWL at 3 years post intervention when adjusting for baseline characteristics. RESULTS:4901 patients were included for analysis (3004 cRYGB, 1897 GLP1-RA). There was no difference in pre-intervention weight (242.8 ± 44.4 GLP1-RA vs 242.3 ± 57.8 cRYGB, p = .993). cRYGB patients had a higher baseline Hgba1c (6.19 ± 1.4 vs 5.85 ± 1.2, p < 0.001). cRYGB was associated with significantly greater weight loss at all post operative time points up to 3 years post intervention, (26.1 vs 13.7%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in Hgba1c control between treatments at all post intervention time points (all p > 0.05). In the multivariate linear regression analysis, when adjusting for sex, baseline BMI, baseline age, and non-white race, cRYGB was associated with an 11% greater %TBWL compared to those who were treated with a GLP1-RA. CONCLUSIONS:For patients who have had insufficient weight loss or weight recurrence following sleeve gastrectomy, conversion to RYGB offers greater, long-term weight loss compared to GLP1-RAs.

Hiatal hernias occur when abdominal contents, typically the stomach, herniate through the esophageal hiatus into the mediastinum, causing symptoms such as reflux, chest pain, and dysphagia. Surgical repair aims to restore anatomy and prevent complications such as obstruction or strangulation. While sliding hernias are more common, paraesophageal hernias more frequently necessitate surgery. A case of small bowel herniation into the right hemithorax through a recurrent hiatal hernia in a 77-year-old male with a history of reflux and stage II esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation, immunotherapy, and esophagectomy. He presented with abdominal pain and dyspnea. Computed tomography imaging revealed small bowel obstruction due to herniation into the thoracic cavity. Emergent intervention included laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and open small bowel resection. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and follow-up imaging at 3 months showed no recurrence. This case underscores the importance of timely surgical intervention in managing complex recurrent paraesophageal hernias.

BACKGROUND:Conversion from sleeve gastrectomy (SG) to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) may be indicated for patients due to insufficient weight loss or weight regain. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To assess weight loss outcomes and factors predictive of improved weight loss in patients undergoing RYGB after SG and create an algorithm to estimate postoperative weight loss in these patients. SETTING/METHODS:University Hospital. METHODS:Retrospective review of patients who underwent conversion from SG to RYGB from 2015 to 2022 was performed, assessing pre-and post-operative weights for each procedure. RESULTS:increase yielded 0.8% greater %TBWL [95% CI 0.5-1%, p < 0.0001]) and peak %EWL ≥ 40% after SG (yielding 5.5% more %TBWL, 95%CI 3.9-7.1%, p < 0.0001). Conversely, those who had ≥ 20% weight regain after SG had 4.1% less %TBWL (95%CI 2.5-5.7%, p < 0.0001) after conversion. These factors were used to create BE-CALM, an algorithm to predict %TBWL one year after conversion to RYGB. CONCLUSIONS:Conversion from SG to RYGB is effective for further weight loss. Patients who have higher starting BMI, ≥ 40% %EWL or ≤ 20% weight regain after SG demonstrate the most effective weight loss post-conversion.

BACKGROUND:Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including Portomesenteric vein thrombosis (PMVT), is a major complication of sleeve gastrectomy (SG). We changed our practice in July 2021 to routinely discharge all SG patients postoperatively with extended chemoprophylaxis for 30 days. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Evaluate the efficacy and safety of routine extended chemoprophylaxis compared to 2 prior timeframes using selective extended chemoprophylaxis. SETTING/METHODS:University Hospital. METHODS:Between 2012-2018, SG patients were discharged on extended chemoprophylaxis for patients deemed "high-risk" for VTE, including patients with body mass index (BMI) >50, and previous VTE. Between 2018-2021, extended chemoprophylaxis was broadened to include patients with positive preoperative thrombophilia panels (including Factor VIII). After 2021, all SG were routinely discharged on extended chemoprophylaxis. The typical regimen was 30 days Lovenox BID (40-mg twice daily for BMI> 40, 60-mg twice daily for BMI >60). Outcomes evaluated were rate of VTE/PMVT and postoperative bleed, including delayed bleed. RESULTS:, respectively. The overall incidence of PMVT was 33/8864 (.37%). Converting from selective extended chemoprophylaxis (Group 1) to routine extended chemoprophylaxis (Group 3) decreased the rate of PMVT from .55% to .21% (P = .13). There was a significantly higher overall bleeding rate (.85%), including delayed bleeds (.34%) in the routine extended chemoprophylaxis patients (P < .05). These bleeds were mainly managed nonoperatively. CONCLUSIONS:Routine extended (30 day) chemoprophylaxis for all SG may reduce PMVT rate but lead to a higher bleeding rate post-operatively. The vast majority of the increased bleeds are delayed and can be managed non-operatively.

BACKGROUND:Portomesenteric vein thrombosis (PMVT) may occur after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Previous studies have shown that PMVT patients may have undiagnosed thrombophilia. We recently changed our practice to check thrombophilia panel in every LSG patient preoperatively. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To estimate the thrombophilia prevalence in patients seeking LSG, and determine if extended chemoprophylaxis post LSG reduces PMVT. SETTINGS/METHODS:University hospital. METHODS:Thrombophilia panels were drawn on every patient seeking LSG after July 2018 at 2 high-volume accredited bariatric surgery centers. A positive panel included factor VIII >150%; protein C <70%; protein S <55%; antithrombin III <83%; and activated protein C resistance <2.13. Patients with a positive panel were discharged on extended chemoprophylaxis. PMVT rates and bleeding occurrences were recorded for LSG patients from August 2018 to March 2019 and were compared with a historic cohort of LSG performed from January 2014 to July 2018. RESULTS:, respectively. Of the cohort, 52.4% (563/1075) had positive thrombophilia panel, including factor VIII elevation (91.5%), antithrombin III deficiency (6.0%), protein S deficiency (1.1%), protein C deficiency (.9%), and activated protein C resistance (.5%). Between January 2014 and July 2018, 13 PMVT were diagnosed among 4228 LSG (.3%) and there were 17 bleeding occurrences (.4%). After August 2018, one PMVT was diagnosed among 745 LSG (.1%) and there were 5 bleeding occurrences (.6%). CONCLUSIONS:The estimated thrombophilia prevalence in patients seeking LSG is 52.4%. The majority (91.5%) of these patients have factor VIII elevation. Extended prophylaxis may decrease PMVT postLSG.

BACKGROUND:. At 3-year follow-up, surgery was very effective in T2D remission; furthermore, in the surgical group, those with a higher baseline soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products had a lower postoperative BMI. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To provide long-term follow-up of this initial patient cohort. SETTING/METHODS:University Hospital. METHODS:Retrospective chart review was performed of the initial patient cohort. Patients lost to follow-up were systematically contacted to return to clinic for a follow-up visit. Data were compared using 2-sample t test, Fisher's exact test, or analysis of variance when applicable. RESULTS:; P = .007), and higher percent weight loss (21.4% versus 10.3%; P = .025). Baseline soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products was not associated with long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS:remains effective long term. Baseline soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products are most likely predictive of early outcomes only.

Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity. Availability of different procedures with low complication rates, performed through a minimally invasive approach, have caused profound positive effect on patient's quality of life and has led to their worldwide, rapid expansion of the field. The laparoscopic revolution has introduced the concept of lowering more and more the treatments' invasiveness, leading to a change in the researchers' mentality. They are now constantly looking for reducing patients' discomfort through new methodologies and devices: aim of this review is to provide an in-depth analysis of the most promising, innovative procedures offering an alternative approach to "classic" laparoscopic procedures. They are described from their original development phases to the most recent experimental and clinical evidence. This review will discuss as well their future perspectives, and includes endoluminal techniques and/or procedures based on alternative concepts, all representing an appealing alternative to surgical approach. We conducted a MEDLINE for articles, clinical trials, and a patent search relating to the minimally invasive management of obesity, excluding intragastric balloons, SILS, and NOTES, and we selected 77 articles. Results are reported for each procedure/device, and discussed both in these paragraphs and in the final, general discussion. The concept of minimally invasive procedures continues to change and evolve over time with novel technologies emerging every year.