Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

person:sulmae01

in-biosketch:true

Total Results:

264


Comparison of pharmacological inhibitors of lysine-specific demethylase 1 in glioblastoma stem cells reveals inhibitor-specific efficacy profiles

Stitzlein, Lea M; Gangadharan, Achintyan; Walsh, Leslie M; Nam, Deokhwa; Espejo, Alexsandra B; Singh, Melissa M; Patel, Kareena H; Lu, Yue; Su, Xiaoping; Ezhilarasan, Ravesanker; Gumin, Joy; Singh, Sanjay; Sulman, Erik; Lang, Frederick F; Chandra, Joya
INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Improved therapies for glioblastoma (GBM) are desperately needed and require preclinical evaluation in models that capture tumor heterogeneity and intrinsic resistance seen in patients. Epigenetic alterations have been well documented in GBM and lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1/KDM1A) is amongst the chromatin modifiers implicated in stem cell maintenance, growth and differentiation. Pharmacological inhibition of LSD1 is clinically relevant, with numerous compounds in various phases of preclinical and clinical development, but an evaluation and comparison of LSD1 inhibitors in patient-derived GBM models is lacking. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:To assess concordance between knockdown of LSD1 and inhibition of LSD1 using a prototype inhibitor in GBM, we performed RNA-seq to identify genes and biological processes associated with inhibition. Efficacy of various LSD1 inhibitors was assessed in nine patient-derived glioblastoma stem cell (GSC) lines and an orthotopic xenograft mouse model. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:LSD1 inhibitors had cytotoxic and selective effects regardless of GSC radiosensitivity or molecular subtype. In vivo, LSD1 inhibition via GSK-LSD1 led to a delayed reduction in tumor burden; however, tumor regrowth occurred. Comparison of GBM lines by RNA-seq was used to identify genes that may predict resistance to LSD1 inhibitors. We identified five genes that correlate with resistance to LSD1 inhibition in treatment resistant GSCs, in GSK-LSD1 treated mice, and in GBM patients with low LSD1 expression. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Collectively, the growth inhibitory effects of LSD1 inhibition across a panel of GSC models and identification of genes that may predict resistance has potential to guide future combination therapies.
PMCID:10111022
PMID: 37082446
ISSN: 1664-2295
CID: 5466332

Clinical utility of whole-genome DNA methylation profiling as a primary molecular diagnostic assay for central nervous system tumors-A prospective study and guidelines for clinical testing

Galbraith, Kristyn; Vasudevaraja, Varshini; Serrano, Jonathan; Shen, Guomiao; Tran, Ivy; Abdallat, Nancy; Wen, Mandisa; Patel, Seema; Movahed-Ezazi, Misha; Faustin, Arline; Spino-Keeton, Marissa; Roberts, Leah Geiser; Maloku, Ekrem; Drexler, Steven A; Liechty, Benjamin L; Pisapia, David; Krasnozhen-Ratush, Olga; Rosenblum, Marc; Shroff, Seema; Boué, Daniel R; Davidson, Christian; Mao, Qinwen; Suchi, Mariko; North, Paula; Hopp, Amanda; Segura, Annette; Jarzembowski, Jason A; Parsons, Lauren; Johnson, Mahlon D; Mobley, Bret; Samore, Wesley; McGuone, Declan; Gopal, Pallavi P; Canoll, Peter D; Horbinski, Craig; Fullmer, Joseph M; Farooqui, Midhat S; Gokden, Murat; Wadhwani, Nitin R; Richardson, Timothy E; Umphlett, Melissa; Tsankova, Nadejda M; DeWitt, John C; Sen, Chandra; Placantonakis, Dimitris G; Pacione, Donato; Wisoff, Jeffrey H; Teresa Hidalgo, Eveline; Harter, David; William, Christopher M; Cordova, Christine; Kurz, Sylvia C; Barbaro, Marissa; Orringer, Daniel A; Karajannis, Matthias A; Sulman, Erik P; Gardner, Sharon L; Zagzag, David; Tsirigos, Aristotelis; Allen, Jeffrey C; Golfinos, John G; Snuderl, Matija
BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Central nervous system (CNS) cancer is the 10th leading cause of cancer-associated deaths for adults, but the leading cause in pediatric patients and young adults. The variety and complexity of histologic subtypes can lead to diagnostic errors. DNA methylation is an epigenetic modification that provides a tumor type-specific signature that can be used for diagnosis. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We performed a prospective study using DNA methylation analysis as a primary diagnostic method for 1921 brain tumors. All tumors received a pathology diagnosis and profiling by whole genome DNA methylation, followed by next-generation DNA and RNA sequencing. Results were stratified by concordance between DNA methylation and histopathology, establishing diagnostic utility. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Of the 1602 cases with a World Health Organization histologic diagnosis, DNA methylation identified a diagnostic mismatch in 225 cases (14%), 78 cases (5%) did not classify with any class, and in an additional 110 (7%) cases DNA methylation confirmed the diagnosis and provided prognostic information. Of 319 cases carrying 195 different descriptive histologic diagnoses, DNA methylation provided a definitive diagnosis in 273 (86%) cases, separated them into 55 methylation classes, and changed the grading in 58 (18%) cases. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:DNA methylation analysis is a robust method to diagnose primary CNS tumors, improving diagnostic accuracy, decreasing diagnostic errors and inconclusive diagnoses, and providing prognostic subclassification. This study provides a framework for inclusion of DNA methylation profiling as a primary molecular diagnostic test into professional guidelines for CNS tumors. The benefits include increased diagnostic accuracy, improved patient management, and refinements in clinical trial design.
PMCID:10355794
PMID: 37476329
ISSN: 2632-2498
CID: 5536102

RADIONUCLIDE THERAPY WITH 177LU-DOTATATE (LUTATHERA) IN ADULTS WITH ADVANCED INTRACRANIAL MENINGIO [Meeting Abstract]

Kurz, S; Zan, E; Cordova, C; Barbaro, M; Troxel, A; Silverman, J; Snuderl, M; Zagzag, D; Golfinos, J; Kondziolka, D; Sulman, E
BACKGROUND: While most meningiomas are considered benign tumors, a subset of these tumors are characterized by a more aggressive clinical course and require multimodal treatment. Beyond surgical and radiotherapeutic options, there are no effective medical treatments available. Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) is expressed by the majority of meningiomas. 177Lu-DOTATATE is a SSTR2-targeting radionuclide that has been successful in neuroendocrine tumors. Here we report the results of the interim analysis of an ongoing clinical trial (NCT03971461) that is evaluating the effect of 177Lu-DOTATATE in treating progressive intracranial meningiomas.
METHOD(S): In this Simon two-stage design phase II study, adults with advanced intracranial meningiomas received 177Lu-DOTATATE 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) every eight weeks for four doses. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-MRI was performed before and at the end of treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS-6). Correlative studies evaluated the association of PFS-6, objective response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival with radiographic tumor measurements, 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake on PET-MRI, SSTR2 expression in tumor, and meningioma methylation subclass.
RESULT(S): Fourteen patients (F = 11, M = 3) with progressive meningiomas (WHO I = 3, II = 10, III = 1) have been enrolled. Median age was 63.1 (range 49-78) years. All patients previously underwent tumor resection and at least one course of radiation. Treatment with 177Lu-DOTATATE was well tolerated, no treatment-limiting toxicities were observed. Six of 14 patients (42%) achieved PFS-6. Radiographically, all six patients had achieved Stable Disease. A functional alteration of tumoral SSTR2 expression by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-MR imaging was observed in three patients.
CONCLUSION(S): Treatment with SSTR2- targeting 177Lu-DOTATATE is well tolerated. In this interim analysis, six of 14 patients achieved PFS-6. This exceeds the predefined threshold to continue to stage two of this study. This clinical trial is now open to patient enrollment at two study sites in the US
EMBASE:639939893
ISSN: 1523-5866
CID: 5513302

Lineage-coupled clonal capture identifies clonal evolution mechanisms and vulnerabilities of BRAFV600E inhibition resistance in melanoma

Zhang, Ze-Yan; Ding, Yingwen; Ezhilarasan, Ravesanker; Lhakhang, Tenzin; Wang, Qianghu; Yang, Jie; Modrek, Aram S; Zhang, Hua; Tsirigos, Aristotelis; Futreal, Andrew; Draetta, Giulio F; Verhaak, Roel G W; Sulman, Erik P
Targeted cancer therapies have revolutionized treatment but their efficacies are limited by the development of resistance driven by clonal evolution within tumors. We developed "CAPTURE", a single-cell barcoding approach to comprehensively trace clonal dynamics and capture live lineage-coupled resistant cells for in-depth multi-omics analysis and functional exploration. We demonstrate that heterogeneous clones, either preexisting or emerging from drug-tolerant persister cells, dominated resistance to vemurafenib in BRAFV600E melanoma. Further integrative studies uncovered diverse resistance mechanisms. This includes a previously unrecognized and clinically relevant mechanism, chromosome 18q21 gain, which leads to vulnerability of the cells to BCL2 inhibitor. We also identified targetable common dependencies of captured resistant clones, such as oxidative phosphorylation and E2F pathways. Our study provides new therapeutic insights into overcoming therapy resistance in BRAFV600E melanoma and presents a platform for exploring clonal evolution dynamics and vulnerabilities that can be applied to study treatment resistance in other cancers.
PMCID:9537441
PMID: 36202798
ISSN: 2056-5968
CID: 5361762

Modern Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Vestibular Schwannoma Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Berger, Assaf; Alzate, Juan Diego; Bernstein, Kenneth; Mullen, Reed; McMenomey, Sean; Jethanemest, Daniel; Friedmann, David R; Smouha, Eric; Sulman, Erik P; Silverman, Joshua S; Roland, J Thomas; Golfinos, John G; Kondziolka, Douglas
BACKGROUND:For patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has proven effective in controlling tumor growth while hearing preservation remains a key goal. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate hearing outcomes in the modern era of cochlear dose restriction. METHODS:During the years 2013 to 2018, 353 patients underwent Gamma knife surgery for VS at our institution. We followed 175 patients with pre-SRS serviceable hearing (Gardner-Robertson Score, GR 1 and 2). Volumetric and dosimetry data were collected, including biological effective dose, integral doses of total and intracanalicular tumor components, and hearing outcomes. RESULTS:The mean age was 56 years, 74 patients (42%) had a baseline GR of 2, and the mean cochlear dose was 3.5 Gy. The time to serviceable hearing loss (GR 3-4) was 38 months (95% CI 26-46), with 77% and 62% hearing preservation in the first and second years, respectively. Patients optimal for best hearing outcomes were younger than 58 years with a baseline GR of 1, free canal space ≥0.041 cc (diameter of 4.5 mm), and mean cochlear dose <3.1 Gy. For such patients, hearing preservation rates were 92% by 12 months and 81% by 2 years, staying stable for >5 years post-SRS, significantly higher than the rest of the population. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Hearing preservation after SRS for patients with VS with serviceable hearing is correlated to the specific baseline GR score (1 or 2), age, cochlear dose, and biological effective dose. Increased tumor-free canal space correlates with better outcomes. The most durable hearing preservation correlates with factors commonly associated with smaller tumors away from the cochlea.
PMID: 35973088
ISSN: 1524-4040
CID: 5299902

DNA methylation-based epigenetic signatures predict somatic genomic alterations in gliomas

Yang, Jie; Wang, Qianghu; Zhang, Ze-Yan; Long, Lihong; Ezhilarasan, Ravesanker; Karp, Jerome M; Tsirigos, Aristotelis; Snuderl, Matija; Wiestler, Benedikt; Wick, Wolfgang; Miao, Yinsen; Huse, Jason T; Sulman, Erik P
Molecular classification has improved diagnosis and treatment for patients with malignant gliomas. However, classification has relied on individual assays that are both costly and slow, leading to frequent delays in treatment. Here, we propose the use of DNA methylation, as an emerging clinical diagnostic platform, to classify gliomas based on major genomic alterations and provide insight into subtype characteristics. We show that using machine learning models, DNA methylation signatures can accurately predict somatic alterations and show improvement over existing classifiers. The established Unified Diagnostic Pipeline (UniD) we develop is rapid and cost-effective for genomic alterations and gene expression subtypes diagnostic at early clinical phase and improves over individual assays currently in clinical use. The significant relationship between genetic alteration and epigenetic signature indicates broad applicability of our approach to other malignancies.
PMCID:9338285
PMID: 35906213
ISSN: 2041-1723
CID: 5277052

Significant survival improvements for patients with melanoma brain metastases: can we reach cure in the current era?

Berger, Assaf; Bernstein, Kenneth; Alzate, Juan Diego; Mullen, Reed; Silverman, Joshua S; Sulman, Erik P; Donahue, Bernadine R; Pavlick, Anna C; Gurewitz, Jason; Mureb, Monica; Mehnert, Janice; Madden, Kathleen; Palermo, Amy; Weber, Jeffrey S; Golfinos, John G; Kondziolka, Douglas
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:New therapies for melanoma have been associated with increasing survival expectations, as opposed to the dismal outcomes of only a decade ago. Using a prospective registry, we aimed to define current survival goals for melanoma patients with brain metastases (BM), based on state-of-the-art multimodality care. METHODS:We reviewed 171 melanoma patients with BM receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) who were followed with point-of-care data collection between 2012 and 2020. Clinical, molecular and imaging data were collected, including systemic treatment and radiosurgical parameters. RESULTS:SRS were predictors of long-term survival ([Formula: see text] 5 years) from initial SRS (p = 0.023 and p = 0.018, respectively). Five patients (16%) of the long-term survivors required no active treatment for [Formula: see text] 5 years. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Long-term survival in patients with melanoma BM is achievable in the current era of SRS combined with immunotherapies. For those alive [Formula: see text] 5 years after first SRS, 16% had been also off systemic or local brain therapy for over 5 years. Given late recurrences of melanoma, caution is warranted, however prolonged survival off active treatment in a subset of our patients raises the potential for cure.
PMID: 35665462
ISSN: 1573-7373
CID: 5248172

Risk of Second Primary Neoplasms of the Central Nervous System

Liu, Elisa K; Oh, Cheongeun; Kondziolka, Douglas; Sulman, Erik P
Purpose/UNASSIGNED:Second primary (SP) neoplasms of the central nervous system (CNS) among cancer survivors are devastating but poorly understood processes. The absolute risk, or true incidence, of developing an SP CNS tumor among cancer survivors is not well characterized. Methods and Materials/UNASSIGNED:Patients diagnosed with cancer between 1975 and 2016 were queried using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Cumulative incidence rates (CIRs) were estimated using competitive risk analysis. The effects of covariates were assessed using multivariate competitive risk regression. Results/UNASSIGNED: = 7e-5). Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:The risk of developing a second primary CNS neoplasm is elevated in patients with a prior CNS cancer independent of treatment history. The association between cranial radiation therapy and risk for subsequent cancers may be limited to the pediatric population.
PMCID:9260125
PMID: 35814854
ISSN: 2452-1094
CID: 5279782

Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: ASCO Guideline Endorsement of ASTRO Guideline

Schiff, David; Messersmith, Hans; Brastianos, Priscilla K; Brown, Paul D; Burri, Stuart; Dunn, Ian F; Gaspar, Laurie E; Gondi, Vinai; Jordan, Justin T; Maues, Julia; Mohile, Nimish; Redjal, Navid; Stevens, Glen H J; Sulman, Erik P; van den Bent, Martin; Wallace, H James; Zadeh, Gelareh; Vogelbaum, Michael A
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) has developed a guideline on appropriate radiation therapy for brain metastases. ASCO has a policy and set of procedures for endorsing clinical practice guidelines that have been developed by other professional organizations. METHODS:was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists. An ASCO Endorsement Panel subsequently reviewed the content and the recommendations. RESULTS:. RECOMMENDATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:is conditionally recommended.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.
PMID: 35561283
ISSN: 1527-7755
CID: 5214992

Treatment for Brain Metastases: ASCO-SNO-ASTRO Guideline

Vogelbaum, Michael A.; Brown, Paul D.; Messersmith, Hans; Brastianos, Priscilla K.; Burri, Stuart; Cahill, Dan; Dunn, Ian F.; Gaspar, Laurie E.; Gatson, Na Tosha N.; Gondi, Vinai; Jordan, Justin T.; Lassman, Andrew B.; Maues, Julia; Mohile, Nimish; Redjal, Navid; Stevens, Glen; Sulman, Erik; Van Den Bent, Martin; Wallace, H. James; Weinberg, Jeffrey S.; Zadeh, Gelareh; Schiff, David
Purpose: To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for patients with brain metastases from solid tumors. Methods: ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. Results: Thirty-two randomized trials published in 2008 or later met eligibility criteria and form the primary evidentiary base. Recommendations: Surgery is a reasonable option for patients with brain metastases. Patients with large tumors with mass effect are more likely to benefit than those with multiple brain metastases and/or uncontrolled systemic disease. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases should receive local therapy regardless of the systemic therapy used. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, local therapy should not be deferred unless deferral is specifically recommended in this guideline. The decision to defer local therapy should be based on a multidisciplinary discussion of the potential benefits and harms that the patient may experience. Several regimens were recommended for non-small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases and no systemic therapy options, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone should be offered to patients with one to four unresected brain metastases, excluding small-cell lung carcinoma. SRS alone to the surgical cavity should be offered to patients with one to two resected brain metastases. SRS, whole brain radiation therapy, or their combination are reasonable options for other patients. Memantine and hippocampal avoidance should be offered to patients who receive whole brain radiation therapy and have no hippocampal lesions and 4 months or more expected survival. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with either Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 50 or Karnofsky Performance Status < 70 with no systemic therapy options do not derive benefit from radiation therapy.
SCOPUS:85127314985
ISSN: 1522-8517
CID: 5198312