Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Tracheal intubation is a common yet high risk procedure in the critically ill with as many as half experiencing peri-intubation adverse outcomes. RESEARCH QUESTION/OBJECTIVE:We aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of various sedative agents used for endotracheal intubation of the critically ill patient in the emergency department, intensive care unit, operating room, and pre-hospital setting. STUDY DESIGN & METHODS/METHODS:We conducted a network meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane, and trial registries from inception to December 10, 2025 for Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more sedative agents in critically ill adults or children undergoing endotracheal intubation. Outcomes of interest were hemodynamic instability during intubation, hypoxemia, cardiac arrest, mortality, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, vasopressor use, adrenal insufficiency, and first-pass success. Reviewers screened, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool independently and in duplicate. We performed frequentist random-effects model network meta-analysis and used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to rate certainty in estimates. RESULTS:We included 21 RCTs enrolling 6,031 patients across Intensive Care Unit, Emergency Department, Operating Room, and pre-hospital settings. Compared with etomidate, there is probably more hemodynamic instability during intubation with ketamine (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.15-1.48; moderate certainty). Ketamine-propofol may decrease hemodynamic instability during intubation compared with etomidate (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27-0.72; low certainty) and ketamine (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21-0.56; low certainty). Compared with etomidate, ketamine may decrease the need for the initiation of post-intubation continuous infusion vasopressors (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.50-1.28; low certainty). Etomidate caused increased adrenal suppression compared with other agents. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSIONS:When considering sedation agents for endotracheal intubation of the critically ill, etomidate probably causes less hemodynamic instability during intubation when compared with ketamine. However, etomidate may increase the need for the initiation of post-intubation continuous infusion vasopressors when compared with ketamine and increases adrenal suppression. The clinical importance of these competing effects remains uncertain. Ketamine-propofol may decrease hemodynamic instability during intubation when compared with etomidate and ketamine though the available evidence is too limited and uncertain to support firm conclusions and further randomized trials are needed.

Optimal initial non-invasive management of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), of both coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and non-COVID-19 etiologies, has been the subject of significant discussion. Avoidance of endotracheal intubation reduces related complications, but maintenance of spontaneous breathing with intense respiratory effort may increase risks of patients' self-inflicted lung injury, leading to delayed intubation and worse clinical outcomes. High-flow nasal oxygen is currently recommended as the optimal strategy for AHRF management for its simplicity and beneficial physiological effects. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV), delivered as either pressure support or continuous positive airway pressure via interfaces like face masks and helmets, can improve oxygenation and may be associated with reduced endotracheal intubation rates. However, treatment failure is common and associated with poor outcomes. Expertise and knowledge of the specific features of each interface are necessary to fully exploit their potential benefits and minimize risks. Strict clinical and physiological monitoring is necessary during any treatment to avoid delays in endotracheal intubation and protective ventilation. In this narrative review, we analyze the physiological benefits and risks of spontaneous breathing in AHRF, and the characteristics of tools for delivering NIV. The goal herein is to provide a contemporary, evidence-based overview of this highly relevant topic.

Optimisation of oxygenation strategies in patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure is a top priority for acute care physicians, as hypoxaemic respiratory failure is one of the leading causes of admission. Various oxygenation methods range from non-invasive face masks to high flow nasal cannulae, which have advantages and disadvantages for this heterogeneous patient group. Focus has turned toward examining the benefits of non-invasive ventilation, as this was heavily researched in resource-limited settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. The oxygenation strategy should be determined on an individualised basis for patients, and with new evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic, providers may now consider placing further emphasis on non-invasive approaches. As non-invasive ventilation continues to be used in increasing frequency, new methods of monitoring patient response, including when to escalate ventilation strategy, will need to be validated.

BACKGROUND:In regional systems of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care, patients presenting to hospitals without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are transferred to PCI-capable hospitals for primary PCI. Repatriation, a practice whereby such patients are transferred back to non-PCI referral hospitals after reperfusion is prevalent in many jurisdictions, yet little is known of this practice and its safety. METHODS:We studied 979 consecutive STEMI patients transported from the emergency department and catchment area of two non-PCI hospitals in Ontario, Canada to a regional PCI-hospital for primary PCI between January 2008 and June 2014. Logistic regression modeling was performed to determine factors associated with delayed repatriation beyond 24 hours and to evaluate the association between repatriation and index-admission mortality. RESULTS:Eight hundred and fifteen (83.2%) patients were repatriated with 524 (65.2%) patients repatriated within 24 hours. Factors independently associated with delayed repatriation included systolic blood pressure (OR 1.03 per 5 mmHg decrease, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, P= .04), requirement for mechanical ventilation (OR 24.9, 95% CI 5.4-115.3, P< .0001), ventricular arrhythmia (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.3-6.6, P= .01), infarct-related artery (P= .03), final TIMI flow grade (P= .01) and access-site complications (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.04-5.4, P= .04). After repatriation, 9 (1.3%) patients returned to the PCI-hospital for urgent care, and 16 (2.0%) died during index-admission. After adjustment, repatriation was not associated with increase in index-admission mortality (adjusted OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.16-1.32, P= .15). CONCLUSIONS:In a regional STEMI care system in Ontario, Canada, patients are routinely repatriated to non-PCI hospitals after primary PCI. This practice was associated with very low and acceptable rate of return to the PCI-hospital during index-admission without an adverse impact on short-term outcomes.