Searched for: person:vargah03
in-biosketch:true
Focal Small Bowel FDG Uptake in Cancer Patients Undergoing PET/CT: Prevalence and Etiology
Charbel, Charlotte; Woo, Sungmin; Becker, Anton S; Bruzzese, Adam; Leithner, Doris; Mayerhoefer, Marius E; Dimitrova, Maya; Mehnert, Janice; Polsky, David; Vargas, Hebert A
PURPOSE OF THE REPORT/OBJECTIVE:To determine the prevalence, etiology, and clinical significance of incidental focal small bowel FDG uptake in patients undergoing PET/CT for staging of non-small bowel cancers. MATERIAL AND METHODS/METHODS:Retrospective review of consecutive FDG PET/CT examinations obtained for cancer staging with incidental focal small bowel radiotracer uptake was performed. Exclusion criteria included known small bowel pathology or insufficient reference standard. Imaging findings assessed included lesion location, number, CT correlate, SUVmax, and presence of metastases outside the bowel. Clinical data included age, sex, cancer clinical setting, origin, and stage. Focal small bowel FDG uptake etiology (benign vs. metastatic) was determined by composite reference standard (histopathology, clinical, and imaging follow-up). Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Pearson's χ2 test, Fisher exact test, and ROC curve analyses. RESULTS:In a review of 147,516 PET/CT examinations, incidental focal small bowel FDG uptake was rare, with a prevalence of 0.1% (88/147,516). Most cases were metastatic, 60.2% (53/88), most commonly spread from lymphoma [32.1% (17/53)] and melanoma [30.2% (16/53)]. Metastatic lesions were evenly distributed throughout the ileum [47.2% (25/53)] and jejunum [39.6% (21/53)]. Metastatic focal small bowel FDG uptake was associated with presence of other sites of distant metastases, higher SUVmax, and presence of a CT correlate (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Incidental focal small bowel FDG uptake is rare. Most small bowel hypermetabolic foci are metastatic and are predominantly encountered with melanoma and lymphoma. Multiple imaging and clinical factors helped differentiate between benign and metastatic focal small bowel FDG uptake.
PMID: 42148841
ISSN: 1536-0229
CID: 6037702
Diagnosis and Staging of Patients with Prostate Cancer: Report from the 2025 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) Diagnostics
Fanti, Stefano; Turco, Fabio; Tombal, Bertrand; Walz, Jochen; Hofman, Michael S; Hadaschik, Boris; Emmett, Louise; Tilki, Derya; Pecoraro, Giovanna; Salfi, Giuseppe; Attard, Gerhardt; Beltran, Himisha; Bjartell, Anders; Briganti, Alberto; Burger, Irene A; Castro, Elena; Cerci, Juliano J; Chiti, Arturo; Cooperberg, Matthew; Fizazi, Karim; Fossati, Nicola; Gafita, Andrei; Gallina, Andrea; Goffin, Karolien; Horvath, Lisa G; Hugosson, Jonas; Iagaru, Andrei; James, Nicholas D; Kasivisvanathan, Veeru; Koh, Dow-Mu; Kristiansen, Glen; Kumar, Rakesh; Lecouvet, Frederic; Loeb, Stacy; McKay, Rana R; Morris, Michael J; Murphy, Declan G; Murthy, Vedang; Naoun, Natacha; Oprea-Lager, Daniela E; Ost, Piet; O'Sullivan, Joe; Padhani, Anwar R; Palapattu, Ganesh; Paone, Gaetano; Petralia, Giuseppe; Roobol, Monique J; Sartor, Oliver A; Sathekge, Mike; Schuster, David M; Seibert, Tyler M; Spratt, Daniel E; Tempany, Clare; Tunariu, Nina; Vargas, H Alberto; Vogl, Ursula M; Wyatt, Alexander W; Zilli, Thomas; Lin, Hui-Ming; Omlin, Aurelius; Gillessen, Silke; Herrmann, Ken
BACKGROUND:For over a decade the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) covers a variety of topics that greatly impact daily practice. In 2025, a dedicated event was organised to discuss key questions in clinical management of patients with prostate cancer (PC) related to diagnostic tools (APCCC Diagnostics). Here we present the voting results of the APCCC Diagnostics questions. OBJECTIVE; DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTECIPANTS: APCCC Diagnostics 2025 is a pilot project. The scientific committee for APCCC Diagnostics 2025 developed 88 multiple-choice consensus questions on six different topics. Prior to the conference, the panel members (''panellists'') voted on these questions via a web-based survey. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS/METHODS:Consensus was only reached on 17 of 88 questions (19%), of which six (7%) received a strong consensus. Specifically, consensus was reached for two of 17 questions (14%) in "how to diagnose PC"; seven of 16 (44%) in "how to stage PC"; three of 14 (21%) in "Biochemical Recurrence Scenario"; two of 11 (18%) in "metastatic disease: what to do?"; zero of 18 (0%) in "monitoring metastatic PC"; and three of 12 (25%) in "radioligand therapy and imaging." CONCLUSIONS:The voting results and their discussion may assist physicians in navigating controversial areas of clinical management related to diagnosis, staging, and restaging in the different clinical settings for PC, particularly where high-level evidence is scarce or conflicting. The findings can also help funders and policymakers in prioritising areas for future research.
PMID: 42399196
ISSN: 1873-7560
CID: 6063842
Availability, quality, and understandability of English and Spanish-language YouTube content on PSMA PET imaging for prostate cancer
Paluszek, Olivia; Almengo, Katherine; Saunders, Jasmine; Pitsoulakis, Evangelia; Camacho, Mariana Rangel; Clavo, Carlos Rondon; Rivera, Adrian; Perez-Rosas, Veronica; Loeb, Stacy; Vargas, Hebert Alberto
PMID: 42320390
ISSN: 1873-4499
CID: 6050432
Evaluating indeterminate bone lesions and lymph nodes on PSMA-PET: a multidisciplinary consensus algorithm and 1-year implementation results
Woo, Sungmin; Tong, Angela; Becker, Anton S; Friedman, Kent P; Leithner, Doris; Charbel, Charlotte; Mayerhoefer, Marius E; Kostakoglu Shields, Lale; Wysock, James S; Tan, Wei Phin; Pak, Jamie S; Lepor, Herbert; Aghdam, Nima; Mahadevan, Anand; Economides, Minas P; Deng, Fang-Ming; Taneja, Samir S; Zelefsky, Michael J; Wise, David R; Vargas, Hebert A
OBJECTIVE:Indeterminate lesions on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET are challenging to address. We aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate a multidisciplinary consensus algorithm that integrates existing interpretation systems with multimodality imaging and clinicopathological information for interpreting indeterminate bone and lymph node lesions on PSMA-PET. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:This was a retrospective single-center study on a prospectively implemented algorithm. We included all consecutive prostate cancer patients whose PSMA-PET findings for indeterminate bone lesions or lymph nodes were discussed at a multidisciplinary tumor board (MDT) in 2024-2025. An algorithm determining the level of suspicion for metastasis was developed in a multidisciplinary fashion, incorporating lesion location, conventional imaging features, PSMA-PET characteristics, and clinicopathological information. The application of the algorithm and outcomes were documented, compared against a composite reference standard. Comparisons were made with PSMA-RADS and PROMISE V2 PSMA-expression scores. RESULTS:81 patients (median age 68, interquartile range 64-75) were included. Algorithm results were benign (48.1% [39/81]), equivocal (4.9% [4/81]), metastasis (40.7% [33/81]), and mixed (benign and metastatic lesions, 6.2% [5/81]). The algorithm was correct in 94.1% (64 of 68 patients with a sufficient reference standard). The algorithm was discordant with PSMA-RADS in 54.3% (44/81) and with PROMISE V2 PSMA-expression score in 71.6% (58/81). The frequency of equivocal lesions was lower using the algorithm (4.9% [4/81]) compared with PSMA-RADS (53.1% [43/81]) and PSMA-expression score (64.2% [52/81]). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:A multidisciplinary consensus algorithm for interpreting indeterminate bone lesions and lymph nodes on PSMA-PET was developed and implemented. Integrating clinicopathological information and multimodality imaging in an MDT setting reduced equivocal interpretations. KEY POINTS/CONCLUSIONS:Question While prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET has become essential in the management of prostate cancer, indeterminate bone lesions and lymph nodes remain challenging to address. Findings A multidisciplinary algorithm for interpreting indeterminate bone lesions and lymph nodes on PSMA-PET, incorporating clinicopathological information and multimodality imaging, reduced the frequency of equivocal interpretations. Clinical relevance An algorithm for interpreting indeterminate bone lesions and lymph nodes on PSMA-PET, incorporating clinicopathological information and multimodality imaging in a multidisciplinary tumor board setting, decreases the frequency of equivocal interpretations and can potentially help management decisions.
PMID: 41493546
ISSN: 1432-1084
CID: 5980782
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) for Bladder Cancer Diagnosis and Staging: A Guide for Clinicians from the American College of Radiology VI-RADS Steering Committee
Panebianco, Valeria; Briganti, Alberto; Efstathiou, Jason A; Galgano, Samuel J; Luk, Lyndon; Muglia, Valdair F; Redd, Bernadette; de Rooij, Maarten; Takeuchi, Mitsuru; Woo, Sungmin; Vargas, H Alberto; Witjes, J Alfred
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE/OBJECTIVE:Staging of bladder cancer (BC) remains a cornerstone of treatment planning, especially in distinguishing non-muscle-invasive BC (NMIBC) from muscle-invasive BC (MIBC). Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), together with the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) and its neoadjuvant chemotherapy version (nacVI-RADS), has emerged as a noninvasive, standardised tool for local staging and response assessment. Our aim was to provide urologists with a practical, up-to-date overview of bladder mpMRI and its application in diverse clinical settings. METHODS:We conducted a narrative review of the literature, including original studies, meta-analyses, international guidelines, and expert consensus documents, on the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the BC diagnostic and therapeutic pathway. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: mpMRI with VI-RADS improves the accuracy of preoperative staging, helps in avoiding repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumour in selected NMIBC cases, and supports decision-making in MIBC in MRI-based pathways. nacVI-RADS allows assessment of treatment responses after systemic therapies, and can potentially guide bladder-sparing approaches. Barriers include variability in access, guideline inconsistency, the reproducibility of interpretation, and limited cost-effectiveness data. However, ongoing multicentre validation efforts and standardised reporting are helping to mitigate these issues. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:mpMRI, VI-RADS, and nacVI-RADS represent essential tools for enhancing risk stratification and personalising BC management in clinical urology practice. Their integration into multidisciplinary workflows has the potential to improve outcomes and reduce overtreatment.
PMID: 41176432
ISSN: 1873-7560
CID: 5962022
What's next for VI-RADS? Updates and future perspectives from the ACR VI-RADS steering committee
Woo, Sungmin; Muglia, Valdair F; Luk, Lyndon; Takeuchi, Mitsuru; de Rooij, Maarten; Redd, Bernadette; Galgano, Samuel J; Efstathiou, Jason; Briganti, Alberto; Witjes, J Alfred; Panebianco, Valeria; Vargas, Hebert Alberto
Since the introduction of the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS), MRI has become an important imaging modality in the management of patients with bladder cancer. Its excellent diagnostic performance for determining muscle invasion in bladder cancer has been supported by numerous prospective and retrospective studies. Nevertheless, there needs to be continued improvement of the diagnostic performance of VI-RADS and sustained efforts to address remaining unmet clinical needs within the field of bladder cancer. In this paper, we highlight several such areas, some of which are actively being investigated. These include (1) whether to use intravenous contrast media or not (multiparametric vs. biparametric MRI), (2) quantitative metrics to enhance assessment of muscle invasion, (3) anatomic locations that come with pitfalls in staging, (4) introduction of bladder MRI image quality, (5) neoadjuvant chemotherapy VI-RADS (nacVI-RADS) and other considerations needed in the treatment response assessment after systemic therapies, (6) need for wider adoption, training, and implementation, and (7) application of artificial intelligence.
PMCID:13435428
PMID: 42218494
ISSN: 1470-7330
CID: 6070780
Cancer in Organ Recipients With Metastatic Spread to Transplant Organs: A Systematic Review
Ma, Claire; McIntosh, Fiona; Woo, Sungmin; Vargas, Herbert Alberto; Becker, Anton
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Metastatic spread of cancer to transplanted organs is rare, with no prior systematic review. As both the number of transplant recipients and their long term survival increase, such cases may become more common. This systematic review seeks to synthesize all existing case studies describing metastases in transplanted organs. METHODS:A systematic search of EMBASE and PUBMED was conducted following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251119412). Eligible studies described cancer originating from the graft recipient metastasizing to a transplant organ. Studies were summarized across six key domains: patient characteristics, primary tumor types, transplant history, imaging, metastatic cancer treatment, and complications and mortality. RESULTS:Of the 643 studies identified and screened, 12 met the inclusion criteria. The mean patient age was 58 years (±11 years). Affected organs included the liver (n = 7), kidney (n = 4), and lung (n = 1). The most common primary cancer was colorectal cancer. Immunosuppression regimens most often included tacrolimus or cyclosporine. Most studies used CT (n = 6) as the imaging modality to detect metastases. Due to the high prevalence of colorectal cancers, the most common therapy administered was chemotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and folinic acid. Three studies reported complications and seven reported patients passing away. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Metastatic spread to transplanted organs is extremely rare and/or under-reported. Further research may help reveal more about the process of metastatic spread, guide screening, and standardize reporting.
PMID: 42090237
ISSN: 1399-0012
CID: 6031302
Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System: Overcoming Barriers to Global Implementation-AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review
Dehghanpour, Ailin; Davenport, Matthew S; Muglia, Valdair F; Nicola, Refky; Shen, Luyao; Shinagare, Atul B; Vargas, Hebert A; Panebianco, Valeria
Since its introduction in 2018, VI-RADS has emerged as a standardized and reproducible framework for multiparametric MRI assessment of bladder cancer, with validated diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing muscle-invasive disease from non-muscle-invasive disease. Despite growing international interest, expert consensus, and the system's inclusion in most major guidelines, real-world clinical adoption of VI-RADS remains limited. This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review explores the key barriers that hinder implementation of VI-RADS into everyday workflows across diverse health care settings, including skepticism among referring clinicians, an inability (unlike with cystoscopy-based staging) to perform simultaneous tumor resection, suboptimal posttreatment performance, and variability in image quality and reader experience. Additional logistic and economic factors, including restricted access outside of specialized centers and limited cost-effectiveness data, further impair widespread uptake. This article outlines strategic recommendations to address these challenges, including standardizing bladder MRI quality, incorporating structured educational initiatives, refining VI-RADS protocols for posttreatment settings, and fostering multidisciplinary collaboration. VI-RADS has the potential to become a cornerstone of bladder cancer management, but the validation and implementation of a bladder-MRI pathway will depend on continued refinement, acceptance, and alignment across clinical, technical, and guideline domains.
PMID: 40899674
ISSN: 1546-3141
CID: 6030592
Multiparametric MRI assessment of 6-month Post-Treatment response following Real-Time adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Correlation with Post-Treatment PSA kinetics
Woo, Sungmin; Becker, Anton S; Vargas, Hebert Alberto; Tong, Angela; Charbel, Charlotte; Leithner, Doris; Mayerhoefer, Marius E; Schiff, Peter B; Chen, Ting; Wang, Hesheng; Colangelo, Nicholas; Cooney, Jeffrey D; Walters, Ryan; Long, Matthew; Zelefsky, Michael J
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Focal dose intensification strategies targeting the dominant intra-prostatic lesion (DIL) improve outcomes of patients with prostate cancer. The purpose was to determine whether the 6-month multiparametric (mp)MRI response of the DIL is associated with post-treatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics after MRI linear accelerator (LINAC) guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with focal dose intensification. METHODS:), and PSA ≤ 1.0 ng/mL. RESULTS:(100.0% vs 82.9%, p = 0.010) and PSA ≤ 1.0 ng/mL (45.9% vs 11.4%, p = 0.001) compared to those without mpMRI CR. In 10 patients without 6-month mpMRI CR but had further MRI follow-up (median 13 months), DILs either further decreased in size (30.0%) or resolved (70.0%). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Initial 6-month mpMRI response correlates with PSA kinetics, which is associated with important clinical outcomes. mpMRI can be used for post-SBRT evaluation to gauge local tumor response of the DIL, where most recurrences occur.
PMID: 41802704
ISSN: 1879-0887
CID: 6015352
Turning Up the Volume: Continuous PSMA-PET Metrics Add Value for Outcome Prediction in Patients with mCRPC [Editorial]
Vargas, Hebert Alberto; Woo, Sungmin
PMID: 41914862
ISSN: 1527-1315
CID: 6021382