Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Asian American (AA) young adults face a looming diet-related non-communicable disease crisis. Interactions with family members are pivotal in the lives of AA young adults and form the basis of family-based interventions; however, little is known on the role of these interactions in shared family food behaviors. Through an analysis of 2021 nationwide survey data of 18-35-year-old AAs, this study examines how the quality of family member interactions associates with changes in shared food purchasing, preparation, and consumption. METHOD/METHODS:Interaction quality was assessed through 41 emotions experienced while interacting with family, and was categorized as positive (e.g., "I look forward to it"), negative (e.g., "I feel annoyed"), and appreciation-related (e.g., "I feel respected") interactions. Participants were also asked how frequently they ate meals, ate out, grocery shopped, and cooked with their family. RESULTS:Among the 535 AAs surveyed (47.6% East Asian, 21.4% South Asian, 22.6% Southeast Asian), 842 unique family interactions were analyzed; 43.5% of interactions were with mothers, followed by siblings (27.1%), and fathers (18.5%). Participants most frequently ate meals with their family (at least daily for 33.5% of participants), followed by cooking (at least daily for 11.3%). In adjusted analyses, an increase in shared food behaviors was particularly associated with positive interactions, although most strongly with cooking together and least strongly with eating meals together; significant differences between ethnic subgroups were not observed. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Findings revealed the importance of family interaction quality when leveraging family relationships to develop more tailored, impactful AA young adult dietary interventions.

BACKGROUND:Nearly all US adults exceed sodium recommendations, which increases cardiovascular risk. Understanding racial and ethnic differences in sodium sources and behaviors could lead to nuanced public health messaging, dietary interventions, and clinical guidance to achieve population-level sodium reduction more equitably. METHODS AND RESULTS/RESULTS:Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017 to 2020 prepandemic data, racial and ethnic differences in sodium sources and sodium-related behaviors (eg, salt use at the table and in food preparation, doctor advice to reduce sodium, attempts to reduce sodium, and label reading) were assessed using weighted chi-square. Given the nutrient database's assumption that rice is salted may be inappropriate for some ethnic groups, we conducted a secondary analysis altering this assumption. Pizza, soup, and chicken were top sources of sodium across racial and ethnic groups. For Asian American adults, 4 top sources were unique (eg, soy-based condiments). Black adults reported the highest rates of reducing sodium (67% versus 44% among White adults) and receiving physician sodium reduction advice (35% versus 18% among Asian American adults). Asian American adults were the most likely to frequently use salt during food preparation (66% versus Other Race adults 32%) but reported not using salt at the table (39% versus 18% among Mexican American adults). Assuming rice is unsalted reduces Asian American sodium intake estimates by ~325 mg/day. CONCLUSIONS:To equitably address sodium intake, culturally appropriate advice on sources of sodium and salt usage may be needed, particularly for Asian American adults.

Patient race/ethnicity data collection in most U.S. health systems abide by federal standards, determined by the federal Office of Management and Budget. Yet, decades of research show that reliance on these categories alone limits understanding of within-group health disparities, systematically erasing key groups from health data. Because granular race/ethnicity data is complex and patients may be hesitant to disclose this personal information, it is important for health leaders to consider community perspectives when making decisions about race/ethnicity data procedures. As such, this study uses community focus groups to understand: (1) how individuals representing different racial/ethnic identities perceive the collection of race/ethnicity in healthcare settings; (2) differences in opinions between disaggregated race/ethnicity data collection instruments and those using federal standards; and (3) recommended practices for collecting race/ethnicity from patients. Participants self-selected into 13 focus groups and one key informant interview based on the race/ethnicity with which they most closely identified. Audio recordings from these groups were transcribed and evaluated using thematic content analysis. Among the 83 total participants in this study, there was a strong preference for more flexible and specific options for self-identifying race/ethnicity in healthcare settings. Participants also felt comfortable disclosing granular race/ethnicity to health providers but expressed discomfort with disclosing this information for other purposes. Recommendations for healthcare leaders include ensuring patients receive detailed communication about race/ethnicity data use and purpose, allowing multiple category selection, keeping the list of disaggregated response options short so as to not overwhelm patients, and providing a free text option to ensure inclusivity.

BACKGROUND:Online ordering in food pantries may support food security among adults with low socioeconomic status. PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Determine the impact of a transition from in-person ordering to online ordering on the food security status of food pantry clients. METHODS:For this quasi-experimental study, we recruited participants from Met Council's Kosher Food Network in New York City, including one pantry in Staten Island (intervention) and three pantries in the Bronx, Queens, and Brooklyn (comparison). The final sample included 114 and 90 adults in the intervention and comparison groups, respectively, at baseline (April-July 2023); and 77 and 58 adults in those groups during follow-up (October-December 2023). Using a six-item survey, we assessed food security status, where scores range from zero to six points and higher points indicate lower food security. Secondary outcomes included nutrition security status, fruit and vegetable intake, and pantry wait time. We used a difference-in-differences approach to assess differences in outcomes between conditions, including testing for differences by age (18-64 vs. ≥65 years). RESULTS:Food security scores decreased in the intervention and comparison groups over time, with no difference in the decrease between groups (P = .87). Yet, among younger adults in the intervention group, wait time decreased during follow-up, and increased in the comparison group (difference-in-differences = -12.1 minutes (95% CI: -21.9, -2.4); P = .02). We did not observe similar differences among older adults (P = .83), nor significant changes in other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS:The transition to online ordering did not influence food security status among food pantry clients but may help to save time, especially among younger adults. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:NCT05752721.

AIMS/UNASSIGNED:Compare racial/ethnic disparities in the prevalence of non-obese type 2 diabetes (T2D) and the proportion of non-obese individuals among T2D patients. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:for Asian Americans), waist circumference (<102 cm for males, <88 cm for females), and waist-to-hip ratio (<0.9 for males, <0.85 for females). The statistical analysis used marginal standardization of predicted probabilities from multivariable logistic regression to calculate the prevalence. KEY RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among 276,736 participants (mean age 51.7, 61.2% female), non-obese T2D prevalence varied: 6.85% (BMI), 4.17% (waist circumference), 3.63% (waist-to-hip ratio). Asian participants had the highest prevalence of normal-weight T2D (2.70% vs. 1.92% in White, OR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.22-1.69) and non-obese T2D by waist circumference (8.04% vs. 3.36%, OR 2.61, 95% CI: 2.35-2.89). Black participants had the highest prevalence using waist-to-hip ratio (5.37% vs. 2.91%, OR 1.91, 95% CI: 1.80-2.03). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Asian Americans showed higher non-obese T2D prevalence by BMI and waist circumference, while Black adults had higher prevalence by waist-to-hip ratio, suggesting different fat distribution patterns.

Many communities are oftentimes labeled as "hard to reach communities" by health researchers. Instead, what may be a more appropriate framing is that conventional research approaches are a mismatch for recruiting and retaining these understudied communities. This paper describes an inclusive research process with particular attention to engaging multilingual communities in the U.S. that we have developed while implementing a community-level nutrition program. The program, Harvest Share, is an equity-centered, systems-based strategy to improve diet for neighborhood residents in Brooklyn, NY. Our research approach involves three components: participatory mapping, cultural adaptation/transcreation and language justice, and two cross-cutting areas: researcher positionality and research team diversity. The application of these methods in research resulted in our research program being highly accepted by partner organizations and participants. Applying inclusive research practices in addition to centering the community/es of interest will aid in the implementation of solutions that are feasible and culturally and linguistically responsive, ensuring successful recruitment and retention; and in the long run, sustainable, community-engaged solutions that have high acceptability and promote community well-being.

Asian American women are an understudied population facing a substantial mental health burden, largely driven by the increasing rates of gender- and race-based violence and discrimination. Perceived safety, a key factor influencing mental health, has been underexplored. This study aimed to 1) examine the relationship between perceived safety with mental health outcomes (i.e., depression and anxiety); 2) examine the link between safety-related behavioral modifications and mental health outcomes; and 3) explore the moderating effects of loneliness and resilience on these relationships, drawing from a community sample of n = 345 Asian American women. Perceived safety was defined as feeling safe in public spaces, transportation and neighborhoods. In our study, 28.7%, 56.2% and 20.6% of women reported feeling unsafe in public spaces, transportation and neighborhoods, respectively. Feeling unsafe in public spaces was associated with higher odds of depression (aOR=2.37, 95%CI: 1.40, 4.02) and anxiety (aOR=2.61, 95%CI: 1.56, 4.37). Avoiding public spaces, leaving home or transportation were linked to increased odds of depression (aOR=2.05, 95%CI: 1.23, 3.40; aOR=2.26, 95%CI: 1.37, 3.74; aOR=2.03, 95%CI: 1.16, 3.57, respectively) while only avoiding leaving home was associated with anxiety (aOR=2.04, 95%CI: 1.24, 3.36). Loneliness moderated the association between avoiding public spaces and anxiety: avoiding public spaces was significantly associated with greater odds of anxiety among women who were not lonely (aOR = 4.77, 95% CI: 1.24-18.34), but not among those who were lonely (aOR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.53-1.64). Resilience did not moderate these relationships (all p > .050). Our findings highlight the mental health impacts associated with reduced perceptions of safety and safety-related behavioral modifications in this group, highlighting the pervasive fear experienced by Asian American women in their day-to-day lives, and emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to address the unique safety challenges faced by Asian American women.

The COVID-19 pandemic and its related economic challenges exacerbated food insecurity across New York State (NYS). Approximately one third of New York City residents reported use of emergency food services in the pandemic's first year and, in 2021, approximately 1 in 10 NYS residents was food insecure, with rates among Hispanic and Black New Yorkers more than double that of White residents. Although these numbers have decreased following the acute phase of the pandemic, disparities by race and ethnicity persist and use of emergency food services remain elevated for New Yorkers born outside of the United States. Despite this, few policies and interventions that aim to improve the charitable and emergency food systems focus on the cultural relevance and appropriateness of foods provided. In 2022, researchers conducted 12 interviews with key stakeholders from organizations and institutions providing food distribution services to culturally diverse New Yorkers to understand barriers and facilitators related to providing culturally appropriate foods and elicit lessons learned and recommendations to inform future programs and policies. Findings from this study indicate that organizations serving diverse communities recognize the importance of providing culturally appropriate food services and make efforts to tailor these services accordingly. However, they face challenges that limit their capacity to offer foods consistent with the dietary needs and preferences of their clients. Additional funding, policies, and support are needed to improve the availability of culturally inclusive food distribution services within the emergency and charitable food systems.