Searched for: person:zelenn01
in-biosketch:true
A Multi-institutional Analysis of Factors Influencing the Rate of Positive MRI Biopsy Among Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Choi, Seraphina; Borowsky, Peter A; Morgan, Orly; Kwon, Deukwoo; Zhao, Wei; Koru-Sengul, Tulay; Gilna, Gareth; Net, Jose; Kesmodel, Susan; Goel, Neha; Patel, Yamini; Griffiths, Alexa; Feinberg, Joshua A; Kangas-Dick, Aeryn; Andaz, Charusheela; Giuliano, Christina; Zelenko, Natalie; Manasseh, Donna-Marie; Borgen, Patrick; Rojas, Kristin E
BACKGROUND:The use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) is increasing, but its utility in detecting additional malignancy is unclear and delays surgical management (Jatoi and Benson in Future Oncol 9:347-353, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon.12.186 , Bleicher et al. J Am Coll Surg 209:180-187, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.04.010 , Borowsky et al. J Surg Res 280:114-122, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.06.066 ). The present study sought to identify ESBC patients most likely to benefit from preoperative MRI by assessing the positive predictive values (PPVs) of ipsilateral and contralateral biopsies. METHODS:). The PPV of MRI biopsies was calculated with respect to age, family history, breast density, and histology. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression determined whether combinations of age younger than 50 years, dense breasts, family history, and pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) histology led to higher biopsy yield. RESULTS:(odds ratio, 0.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.84; p = 0.041). The combinations of age, density, family history, and histology did not lead to a higher biopsy yield. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Historically accepted factors for recommending preoperative MRI did not appear to confer a higher MRI biopsy yield. To prevent delays to surgical management, MRI should be carefully selected for individual patients most likely to benefit from additional imaging.
PMID: 38286883
ISSN: 1534-4681
CID: 5746032
Calcific Peritendinitis in the Gluteus Maximus Tendon [Case Report]
Mathews, Shibin; Rodriguez-Sein, Andres; Pak, Gunnye; Vu, David M; Zelenko, Natalie; Opsha, Oleg
BACKGROUND:Calcific tendinitis is classically a painful condition that most commonly affects the rotator cuff, but may infrequently involve other tendons. CASE REPORT:We discuss a 57-year-old man who presented to the emergency department with a 4-day history of right hip pain, described as the "worst pain in (his) life." The pain was first noticed at night and had progressively worsened. History, physical examination, and initial laboratory workup indicated an inflammatory vs. infectious process. Continued investigations with imaging techniques revealed the source of pain as calcific tendinitis involving the gluteus maximus tendon. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Symptoms of musculoskeletal pain in the emergency department are ubiquitous. In the proper clinical context, the diagnosis of calcific tendinitis, although uncommon, should be considered once emergent conditions are ruled out. Proper imaging techniques will facilitate accurate diagnosis, expedited pain management, and proper outpatient follow-up.
PMID: 38278683
ISSN: 0736-4679
CID: 5746022
The Association of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) With Surgical Management in Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Borowsky, Peter A; Choi, Seraphina; Moore, Jessica F; White, Amy; Morin, Claudya; Net, Jose; Kesmodel, Susan B; Goel, Neha; Kwon, Deukwoo; Griffiths, Alexa; Feinberg, Joshua A; Zelenko, Natalie; Manasseh, Donna-Marie; Borgen, Patrick; Rojas, Kristin E
INTRODUCTION:The rate of mastectomy in lumpectomy-eligible patients with unilateral breast cancer is increasing. We sought to investigate the association between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical management of patients with early-stage breast cancer by comparing the rate of mastectomy as first surgery in patients with and without preoperative MRI. METHODS:A bi-institutional retrospective study included patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2020. Lumpectomy-eligible patients with in situ and invasive cancer were included. Those receiving preoperative therapy, MRI before diagnosis, or with known bilateral cancer were excluded. The risk factors for bilateral and multicentric disease were accounted for. Fisher's exact and chi-square tests compared categorical variables, Wilcoxon two-sample test analyzed continuous variables, and multivariate analyses were performed with Poisson regression. RESULTS:Four hundred twenty-eight participants met inclusion criteria. Patients who received MRI were younger (58 versus 67 y; P < 0.001) and had denser breasts (group 3 or 4; 61% versus 25%; P < 0.001). Mastectomy rate was twice as high in patients undergoing MRI (32% versus 15%, rate ratio 2.16; P < 0.001), which remained significant in multivariate analysis (rate ratio 2.0; P < 0.001). Contralateral mastectomy (12% versus 4%; P = 0.466) and reexcision (13% versus 12%; P = 0.519) rates were similar. Time to surgery was greater in those receiving MRI alone and MRI biopsy (34 [no MRI] versus 45 [MRI] versus 62 [MRI biopsy]; P < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS:MRI receipt is associated with a doubled rate of mastectomy in lumpectomy-eligible patients. Future work is needed to standardize patient selection for MRI to those with the highest likelihood of having additional undiagnosed disease.
PMID: 35964483
ISSN: 1095-8673
CID: 5746012