Faculty Bibliography

Pediatric renovascular hypertension (RVHTN) results from flow-limiting disease of the renal arterial vasculature and is a potentially treatable cause of pediatric hypertension. Causes of pediatric RVHTN include idiopathic causes, fibromuscular dysplasia, neurofibromatosis, vasculitis, traumatic vascular injury, aneurysms, and aberrant renal arterial supply. Diagnostic imaging allows screening for and confirmation of pediatric RVHTN. Renal sonography with Doppler evaluation is the initial test of choice, followed by CT angiography and MR angiography. However, these modalities may not demonstrate intrarenal segmental or subsegmental branch disease. Therefore, conventional angiography maintains a significant role in diagnosis of pediatric RVHTN. Once diagnosed, pediatric RVHTN is initially treated with antihypertensive medications. Minimally invasive procedures, including angioplasty and embolization, may temporize or cure RVHTN. Surgical intervention-including renal artery reconstruction or reimplantation, aortorenal bypass grafting, or even nephrectomy-may be required for flow-limiting pathologic conditions, which often require endovascular strategies for maintenance. Renal artery stent placement is generally avoided due to limited data and risk of occlusion, although it can be considered in cases of iatrogenic dissection or severe elastic recoil refractory to angioplasty. Having appropriately sized covered stent-grafts nearby as a safety precaution is encouraged when performing these interventions. Radiologists play an invaluable role in the care of patients with pediatric RVHTN through multimodality diagnostic tools, both noninvasive and minimally invasive. The authors review medical management, diagnostic imaging, and endovascular interventions involved in caring for patients with pediatric RVHTN, to optimize diagnostic and interventional radiologist participation in multidisciplinary care with pediatric nephrologists and vascular surgeons. ^©RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.

PURPOSE:To characterize the effectiveness, safety, and length of stay (LOS) associated with pulmonary cryoablation for management of primary lung malignancies in patients aged ≥80 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A retrospective single-center database was compiled of all consecutive patients aged ≥80 years who underwent percutaneous computed tomography-guided cryoablation using modified triple-freeze protocol (1-3 ablation probes) for Stage IA-IIB primary lung malignancies between March 2017 and March 2020 (n = 19; 53% women; mean age, 85 years ± 3.5; range, 80-94 years). Follow-up imaging was assessed for local recurrence. Adverse events and LOS were recorded from chart review. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess both overall and local recurrence-free survival. RESULTS:Mean patient follow-up period was 21.6 months ± 10.8, and mean imaging follow-up period was 19.2 months ± 9.6. Overall survival at 3 years was 94% (95% CI, 81%-100%). Local recurrence-free survival was 100% throughout the imaging follow-up period. Intraprocedural pneumothorax occurred in 37% (7 of 19) of patients; pneumothorax risk was significantly associated with increased tumor distance from pleura (odds ratio, 1.2; P = .018). Sixty-three percent (12 of 19) of patients were discharged on the day of the procedure, with a mean LOS of 7.7 hours ± 1.6, whereas 37% of patients required overnight observation (2 of 19) or admission (5 of 19), with a mean LOS of 48.1 hours ± 19.4. Overall LOS for all patients was 22.6 hours ± 22.9. CONCLUSIONS:Percutaneous cryoablation of primary pulmonary malignancies can be performed in select octogenarians and nonagenarians with high 3-year overall and recurrence-free survival. Despite nonnegligible risk of pneumothorax, most patients are discharged on the day of the procedure.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate ablation zone sizes in patients undergoing pulmonary tumor cryoablation with 14-gauge cryoablation probes. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Single-center retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent cryoablation of pulmonary tumors with one or more 14-gauge probes (August 2017-June 2020) was performed. Intraprocedural and 1-2 month post-procedural chest CTs were evaluated to characterize pulmonary lesions, ice balls, and ablation zones. Single-probe 14-gauge ablation zone volumes were compared to manufacturer reference isotherms, and to single- and two-probe ablation zones from a prior investigation of 17-gauge probes. Overall and local recurrence-free survival were calculated to 3 years. RESULTS:) (all p<0.001). Three-year overall and local recurrence-free survival were 69% (95% CI: 53-89%) and 87% (95% CI: 74-100%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS:14-gauge probes generate larger ablation volumes than 17-gauge probes. Manufacturer-reported isotherms are significantly larger than actual cryoablation zones. Cryoablation can attain low rates of local recurrence.

Bile leaks are rare but potentially devastating iatrogenic or posttraumatic complications. This is being diagnosed more frequently since the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and propensity toward nonsurgical management in select trauma patients. Timely recognition and accurate characterization of a bile leak is crucial for favorable patient outcomes and involves a multimodal imaging approach. Management is driven by the type and extent of the biliary injury and requires multidisciplinary cooperation between interventional radiologists, endoscopists, and hepatobiliary/transplant surgeons. Interventional radiologists have a vital role in both the diagnosis and management of bile leaks. Percutaneous interventional procedures aid in the characterization of a bile leak and in its initial management via drainage of fluid collections. Most bile leaks resolve with decompression of the biliary system which is routinely done via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography. Some bile leaks can be definitively treated percutaneously while others necessitate surgical repair. The primary principle of percutaneous management is flow diversion away from the site of a leak with the placement of transhepatic biliary drainage catheters. While this can be accomplished with relative ease in some cases, others call for more advanced techniques. Bile duct embolization or sclerosis may also be required in cases where a leaking bile duct is isolated from the main biliary tree.