Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: : Nipple-sparing mastectomy warrants thorough preoperative evaluation to effectively achieve risk reduction, high patient satisfaction, and improved aesthetic outcome. To the authors' knowledge, this review represents the largest series of microsurgical breast reconstructions following nipple-sparing mastectomies. METHODS: : All patients undergoing nipple-sparing mastectomy with microsurgical immediate breast reconstruction treated at New York University Medical Center (2007-2011) were identified. Patient demographics, breast cancer history, intraoperative details, complications, and revision operations were examined. Descriptive statistical analysis, including t test or regression analysis, was performed. RESULTS: : In 51 patients, 85 free flap breast reconstructions (n = 85) were performed. The majority of flaps were performed for prophylactic indications [n = 55 (64.7 percent)], mostly through vertical incisions [n = 40 (47.0 percent)]. Donor sites included abdominally based [n = 66 (77.6 percent)], profunda artery perforator [n = 12 (14.1 percent)], transverse upper gracilis [n = 6 (7.0 percent)], and superior gluteal artery perforator [n = 1 (1.2 percent)] flaps. The most common complications were mastectomy skin flap necrosis [n = 11 (12.7 percent)] and nipple necrosis [n = 11 (12.7 percent)]. There was no correlation between mastectomy skin flap or nipple necrosis and choice of incision, mastectomy specimen weight, body mass index, or age (p > 0.05). However, smoking history was associated with nipple necrosis (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: : This series represents a high-volume experience with nipple-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate microsurgical reconstruction. When appropriately executed, it can deliver low complication rates. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: : Therapeutic, IV.

ABSTRACT: Because of increased risk for nipple necrosis, many surgeons believe large ptotic breasts to be a relative contraindication to nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). A retrospective review was performed on 85 consecutive patients who underwent NSM with 141 immediate perforator free-flap breast reconstructions. We analyzed the subset of patients with large ptotic breasts, defined as cup size C or greater, sternal notch to nipple distance greater than 24 cm and grade 2 or 3 breast ptosis. Of the 85 patients, 19 fit the inclusion criteria. Breast cup size ranged from 34C to 38DDD. There was 1 case of nipple necrosis in the patient with previous breast radiation (5%), 1 hematoma (5%), and no flap losses. Five (26%) patients underwent subsequent mastopexy or breast reduction, a mean of 6.6 months after the primary procedure. We demonstrate that NSM and free-flap breast reconstruction can be safely and reliably performed in selected patients.

Introduction: The profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap is a new addition to our reconstructive armamentarium. In effort to better understand patient candidacy for the PAP flap we characterized the profunda artery perforators on preoperative imaging. Methods: A retrospective review was completed of 40 preoperative posterior thigh computed tomography angiographies and magnetic resonance angiographies by four plastic surgeons. The positioning of the patient, type of study, number of perforators, and size of perforators were documented. The location was documented on an x-y-axis. Perforator course and surrounding musculature was documented. Results: In 98.8% of posterior thighs suitable profunda artery perforators were identified. The average number and size of perforators was 3.3 and 1.9 mm. The most common perforator was medial (present in 85.6% of thighs); found near the adductor magnus at 3.8 cm from midline and 5.0 cm below the gluteal fold. The second most common perforator was lateral (present in 65.4% of thighs); found near the biceps femoris and vastus lateralis at 12.0 cm from midline and 5.0 cm below the gluteal fold. Nearly 48.3% were purely septocutaneous. And 51.7% had an intramuscular course (average length 5.7 cm). Preoperative imaging corresponded to suitable perforators at the time of dissection of all PAP flaps. Thirty five PAP flaps (18 patients) were performed with 100% flap survival. Conclusion: Analysis of preoperative posterior thigh imaging confirms our intraoperative findings that a considerable number of suitable posterior thigh profunda perforators are present, emerge from the fascia in a common pattern, and are of sufficient caliber to provide adequate flap perfusion and recipient vessel size match. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery, 2012.

We propose the profunda femoris artery perforator (PAP) flap for autologous breast reconstruction. We provide an anatomic basis for this flap. Ten cadaveric thighs were dissected. A perforator was dissected to its origin. The lengths of pedicle, vessel diameters, and weights were measured. The average distance inferior to the gluteal crease was 3.5 cm (1 to 5 cm). The average distance from the midline was 6.2 cm (3 to 12 cm). The average pedicle length was 10.6 cm. Diameters of the artery and vein averaged 2.3 mm and 2.8 mm. The flaps averaged 28 x 8 cm. The average weight was 206 g (100 to 260 g). Computed tomography angiograms of 20 thighs were examined. Measurements were taken from the gluteal crease and midline to the perforator. The average distance caudal to the gluteal crease was 4.4 cm (1.1 to 7.2 cm). The average distance lateral to the midline was 5.1 cm (2.5 to 9 cm). The data presented in this article provide an anatomic basis for the PAP flap.

Since obesity impairs wound healing and bone marrow (BM)-derived vasculogenic progenitor cells (PCs) are important for tissue repair, we hypothesize that obesity-impaired wound healing is due, in part, to impaired PC mobilization, trafficking, and function. Peripheral blood was obtained from nondiabetic, obese (BMI > 30, n = 25), and nonobese (BMI < 30, n = 17) subjects. Peripheral blood human (h)PCs were isolated, quantified, and functionally assessed. To corroborate the human experiments, 6-mm stented wounds were created on nondiabetic obese mice (TALLYHO/JngJ, n = 15) and nonobese mice (SWR/J, n = 15). Peripheral blood mouse (m)PCs were quantified and wounds were analyzed. There was no difference in the number of baseline circulating hPCs in nondiabetic, obese (hPC-ob), and nonobese (hPC-nl) subjects, but hPC-ob had impaired adhesion (p < 0.05), migration (p < 0.01), and proliferation (p < 0.001). Nondiabetic obese mice had a significant decrease in the number of circulating PCs (mPC-ob) at 7 (p = 0.008) and 14 days (p = 0.003) after wounding. The impaired circulating mPC-ob response correlated with significantly impaired wound closure at days 14 (p < 0.001) and 21 (p < 0.001) as well as significantly fewer new blood vessels in the wounds (p < 0.001). Our results suggest that obesity impairs the BM-derived vasculogenic PC response to peripheral injury and this, in turn, impairs wound closure.

BACKGROUND: : The use of perforator flaps has allowed for the transfer of large amounts of soft tissue with decreased morbidity. For breast reconstruction, the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, the superior and inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps, and the transverse upper gracilis flap are all options. The authors present an alternative source using posterior thigh soft tissue based on profunda artery perforators, termed the profunda artery perforator flap. METHODS: : Preoperative imaging helps identify posterior thigh perforators from the profunda femoris artery. These are marked, and an elliptical skin paddle, approximately 27 x 7 cm, is designed 1 cm inferior to the gluteal crease. Dissection proceeds in a suprafascial plane until nearing the perforator, at which point subfascial dissection is performed. The flap has a long pedicle (approximately 7 to 13 cm), which allows more options when performing anastomosis at the recipient site. The long elliptical shape of the flap allows coning of the tissue to form a more natural breast shape. RESULTS: : All profunda artery perforator flaps have been successful. The donor site is well tolerated and scars have been hidden within the gluteal crease. Long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate for possible fat necrosis of the transferred tissue. CONCLUSIONS: : The authors present a new technique for breast reconstruction with a series of 27 flaps. This is an excellent option when the abdomen is not available because of the long pedicle, muscle preservation, ability to cone the tissue, and hidden scar. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:: Therapeutic, V

We present the deep femoral artery perforator (DFAP) flap, a new perforator flap for breast reconstruction, with a detailed description of operative technique and four clinical examples. The DFAP flap allows harvest of tissue from the lower buttock and lateral thigh with similar territory to an in-the-crease inferior gluteal artery perforator (IGAP) flap but based on a different perforator. When present, the DFAP is the largest vessel supplying this territory and is often septocutaneous, facilitating dissection when compared with the IGAP flap. We used preoperative imaging with magnetic resonance angiography to assist in accurate flap planning which also permitted precise determination of perforator origin. In patients with either a contraindication to abdominal wall-based perforator flaps or weight distribution below the waist, the DFAP flap provides an alternative to the IGAP flap with an excellent pedicle and a favorable location on the lateral thigh

BACKGROUND: Autogenous fat grafting has been observed to alleviate the sequelae of chronic radiodermatitis. To date, no study has replicated this finding in an animal model. METHODS: The dorsa of adult wild-type FVB mice were shaved and depilitated. The dorsal skin was then distracted away from the body and radiated (45Gy) using a Varian 2300 Linear Accelerator. Four weeks following radiation, 1.5cc fat or sham grafts were placed in the dorsal subcutaneous space. Gross results were analyzed photometrically. The animals were sacrificed at 4 and 8 weeks following fat or sham grafting and their dorsal skin was processed for histologic analysis. Inflammation was assessed by epidermal thickness measurements on H&E stained sections. Vascular density was assessed using CD31 staining. Fibrosis was assessed using Smad-3 and Picrosirius Red staining. RESULTS: Hyperpigmentation and ulceration were grossly improved in fat-grafted mice compared to sham-grafted controls. Epidermal thickness measurements demonstrated decreased thickness in fat-grafted animals at both timepoints (20.6+/-1.5mum vs 55.2+/-5.6mum, p=0.004; 17.6+/-1.1mum vs 36.3+/-6.1mum, p=0.039). Vascular density was decreased in fat-grafted mice compared to sham-grafted at both timepoints (17.5+/-1.3 vessels/hpf vs 29+/-3.5, p=0.055; 13.25+/-1.4 vs 17.0+/-1.6, p=0.003). Intensity of Smad3 staining was significantly decreased in fat-grafted animals at both timepoints (2.77+/-0.3% vs 4.98+/-0.9%, p=0.004; 3.05+/-0.2% vs 5.81+/-0.3%, p=0.011). Picrosirius red staining demonstrated a diminished scar-index in fat-treated animals at both timepoints (.54+/-0.05 vs .74+/-0.07, p=0.034; .55+/-0.06 vs .93+/-.07, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Fat grafting attenuates inflammation in acute radiodermatitis and slows the progression of fibrosis in chronic radiodermatitis